Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-13 Thread Leif Madsen
On 12/09/11 09:48 PM, Joseph wrote: Was NAT problem fixed in 1.8.7 ? I'm using 1.4 but I've tried 1.6 and 1.8.5 and in both cases connection is not working with my provider with SIP + NAT. The connection is showing up as registered but the call is not coming IN (congestion). Can you define NAT

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Tarek Sawah
Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4 server that i managed to test it with 500+ concurrent calls and hit 800 concurrent calls with no problem CPU USAGE 90% i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread David Backeberg
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Tarek Sawah tareksa...@hotmail.com wrote: i wanted to upgrade to 1.6 .. i did and when tested it .. the server crashed at 100 concurrent calls. please advise? Nobody will know why your asterisk crashed unless you follow the instructions here:

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Danny Nicholas
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tarek Sawah Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:19 AM To: Asterisk Users Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Hello i am not sure if this has been discussed before.. i have an asterisk 1.4

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Tarek Sawah
9993 From: da...@debsinc.com To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:54:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 I personally would not bother with 1.6 unless you needed some feature in that branch

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Danny Nicholas
: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8 Actually i had to upgrade to 1.6 due to a provider problem with session-timers and RTP data .. then i downgraded again to 1.4. do you suggest that i test 1.8 instead of 1.6? Tarek Sawah Information Technology Adviser Integrated Digital

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Paul Belanger
On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul Belanger Digium, Inc. | Software Developer

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Vs 1.6 Vs 1.8

2011-09-12 Thread Joseph
On 09/12/11 14:08, Paul Belanger wrote: On 11-09-12 12:07 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote: I think that is your best bet. 1.8.6 unless somebody has a good reason not to. You actually might want to test with 1.8.7.0-rc1, this will fix 2 big issue. A performance regressions and timerfd. -- Paul

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2009-10-14 Thread Dan Journo
Hi, I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I should avoid it. What are the advantages of upgrading? And finally, why both versions are available? Why not just scrap 1.4? Many thanks Dan Journo ___ -- Bandwidth

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2009-10-14 Thread David Backeberg
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Dan Journo d...@keshercommunications.com wrote: I was wondering whether there are any problems with v1.6 which means I should avoid it. Try searching the list for the many times this has been answered. Since this is your choice, you need to set up a parallel

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-19 Thread Peter Nabbefeld
Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. Where? And is

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-19 Thread Doug
At 06:49 2/19/2008, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-19 Thread Michiel van Baak
On 13:49, Tue 19 Feb 08, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ?

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-19 Thread Ulexus
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 01:49:58PM +0100, Peter Nabbefeld wrote: Alex Balashov [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate

[asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-18 Thread Seysan
Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? thanks ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 vs 1.6

2008-02-18 Thread Alex Balashov
Seysan wrote: Hello, What is the Differences between Asterisk 1.4 and Asterisk 1.6 ? Also I mean what has made it to be in a separate Branch ? There are release notes that speak to this. -- Alex Balashov Evariste Systems Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel: (+1) (678) 954-0670