Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Andrew Latham
Turn on fax detection so that echo training will not attempt to run on the fax handshake... Andrew lathama Latham TuxTone Inc. http://TuxTone.com andrew.lat...@tuxtone.com On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Michael as...@nettrust.co.nz wrote: Sending works but on receive it keeps failing -

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Michael
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 01:36:25 you wrote: Turn on fax detection so that echo training will not attempt to run on the fax handshake... Andrew lathama Latham TuxTone Inc. http://TuxTone.com andrew.lat...@tuxtone.com Thanks. How is this done on a T38 fax channel please? PS: I see no mention

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Michael
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:02:12 you wrote: When configured with echo training (default) Asterisk attempts to train its self on all calls. You have to tell it to either not train on all calls or turn on fax detection. Andrew lathama Latham How do I turn this on please? I can't find any mention

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Michael
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 02:33:31 you wrote: have a look at the dahdi or zaptel configs and search for echo In the last 9+ years of working with * I have never had a manual, whats it look like..? Andrew lathama Latham TuxTone Inc. http://TuxTone.com andrew.lat...@tuxtone.com And I also

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Cary Fitch
Slightly off topic, but M$ is worth billions because they started in 1976 or so, became the de facto standard, and were pretty cutthroat in the way they do business. They have a profit motive and have always taken the path that makes them bigger with bigger profits, even to the point of fighting

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Michael
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:40:12 you wrote: Slightly off topic, but M$ is worth billions because they started in 1976 or so, became the de facto standard, and were pretty cutthroat in the way they do business. They have a profit motive and have always taken the path that makes them bigger with

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Lee Howard
Michael wrote: Anyway this is a great example of why MICROSOFT is worth billions, and Linux has to be given away. Not because Microsoft is L33T but because the majority of the stuff sold for Windows works out of the box. For what it's worth, their fax software doesn't work very well out of

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Lee Howard
Michael wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:40:12 you wrote: Slightly off topic, but M$ is worth billions because they started in 1976 or so, became the de facto standard, and were pretty cutthroat in the way they do business. They have a profit motive and have always taken the path that makes

Re: [asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-26 Thread Steve Underwood
Michael wrote: On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 03:40:12 you wrote: Slightly off topic, but M$ is worth billions because they started in 1976 or so, became the de facto standard, and were pretty cutthroat in the way they do business. They have a profit motive and have always taken the path that makes

[asterisk-users] Digium fax failing

2009-04-25 Thread Michael
Sending works but on receive it keeps failing - reporting back 'training' failure. I am using Asterisk 1.6 with T38. What should I post to the list to assist diagnoses? Michael ___ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com