On 8/29/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Chavez wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
- Original Message -
From: Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:36 AM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Problems with SpanDSP
Alan Lord wrote:
Steve Davies
On 8/29/07, Christian Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 20:13 +0800 schrieb Steve Underwood:
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat
On 10/30/07, Steve Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Did any progress occur on this? I too am using 0.0.4 spandsp snapshots
to receive faxes with quite a significant degree of success on a
1.2.24 asterisk box. I also get the only 8-bytes in a TIFF file
problem occasionally. Generally this
Steve Davies wrote:
On 8/29/07, Christian Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 20:13 +0800 schrieb Steve Underwood:
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with
On 10/30/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was fixed a few weeks ago. There was an error in the FAX decoder,
but only a very few encoders create images that hit the issue. If you
try 0.0.4pre11 you will find it fixes several other quirky compatibility
issues. I have cleaned up
Steve Davies wrote:
On 10/30/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was fixed a few weeks ago. There was an error in the FAX decoder,
but only a very few encoders create images that hit the issue. If you
try 0.0.4pre11 you will find it fixes several other quirky compatibility
Alan Lord wrote:
Steve Davies wrote:
On 10/30/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was fixed a few weeks ago. There was an error in the FAX decoder,
but only a very few encoders create images that hit the issue. If you
try 0.0.4pre11 you will find it fixes several other
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 16:23 -0500, Carlos Chavez wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
Carlos Chavez wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully.
Most Fax machines do work but I have problems with people having
Tobit FaxWare and Shamrock CapiFax.
Steve,
Are there any plans to get a newer version of spandsp working with Asterisk?
On 8/29/07, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22
Am Mittwoch, den 29.08.2007, 20:13 +0800 schrieb Steve Underwood:
Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully.
Most Fax machines do work but I have problems
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully.
Most Fax machines do work but I have problems with people having
Tobit FaxWare and Shamrock CapiFax.
Christian Peter wrote:
Can anybody help me with this issue. Please no switch to Hylafax
mails, because I'm very happy with SpanDSP, it integrates nicely and
works most time.
*chuckle*
Lee.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
Christian Peter wrote:
Can anybody help me with this issue. Please no switch to Hylafax
mails, because I'm very happy with SpanDSP, it integrates nicely and
It just show you how many people on this list are pleased with HylaFAX+
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Christian Peter wrote:
Can anybody help me with this issue. Please no switch to Hylafax
mails, because I'm very happy with SpanDSP, it integrates nicely and
It just show you how many people on this list are pleased with
HylaFAX+
Doug
--
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully.
Shouldn't you have used spandsp 0.0.3 with asterisk 1.2 ?
--
On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 00:03 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Christian Peter wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running current SpanDSP
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/spandsp/spandsp-0.0.4pre6.tgz
with Asterisk 1.2.22 somewhat successfully.
Shouldn't you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian West wrote:
On Aug 28, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Doug Lytle wrote:
Christian Peter wrote:
Can anybody help me with this issue. Please no switch to Hylafax
mails, because I'm very happy with SpanDSP, it integrates nicely and
It just show you how
On Aug 28, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Matt Riddell wrote:
Sorry to hijack the thread, but its great to see you here again Brian!
- --
Kind Regards,
Matt Riddell
Director
Thanks...
/b
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
21 matches
Mail list logo
