[asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Hello Everyone, I have a new problem where when placing the call, asterisk will automatically go into music on hold until the call is connected (ie, no ringing). It was kind of confusing because sometimes `SESSION PROGRESS` takes longer than others, during this time we are in MOH. The call does

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Joshua Colp
Nick Cameo wrote: There is two way audio, it's just during ringing that this happens. If you can put the SIP signaling and Asterisk console output up somewhere then we can have a better idea of what Asterisk is being told, and what it is doing. -- Joshua Colp Digium, Inc. | Senior Software

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread jg
Does your Dial() command include the m option? jg -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
There is two way audio, it's just during ringing that this happens. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Hello Jg, Thank your for your response. No m option on dial. I think it's a RTP relay issue however, do not know how to diagnose the SDP payload. Any help would be appreciated. N. -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Joshua Colp
Nick Cameo wrote: I ran a test call with trace can be found here: http://pastebin.com/f8MuxaFV I also wanted to mention that yes we have * setup with disallow=all and allow=g729 for testing, maybe permanently if we can successfully setup G729 pass through. That being said, the same problem is

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread jg
Maybe the ringtone from downstream is not reaching asterisk, and thus a2billing is appending the `m` to the dial command? With digital systems (starting with ISDN, or so), ringing is signaled, or indicated. The ringtone is produced locally, either by the PBX or by the SIP phone itself. Since

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Yeah of course. Still digging into it :). Will post the solution if I find it. a2billing forum takes for ever to answer... -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
I have no idea where the `m` is coming from. I even looked into the A2Billing script. Still digging -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Yes of course, I just did not want to overwhelm you guys with SIP trace. Before that though, I realized something: [Sep 10 12:03:30] WARNING[8178]: res_musiconhold.c:802 set_moh_exec: SetMusicOnHold application is deprecated and will be removed. Use Set(CHANNEL(musicclass)=...) instead -- AGI

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Hope this helps someone save a day of running around. So my issue was with a2billing. The warning `No remote address on RTP instance '0xb6d16a28' so dropping frame` was not related to the music on hold coming on during ringing. The Problem: We have a script that loads rates into

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread isrlgb
Did you the a2billing settings for a music on hold setting I remember seeing some setting -Original Message- From: Nick Cameo sym...@gmail.com Sender: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:46:54 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Joshua Colp
Nick Cameo wrote: Yeah!!! The Dial command setting: http://forum.asterisk2billing.org/viewtopic.php?f=2t=1704 I know this is not an a2billing mailing list, and I am sorry however, I do think that the No remote address on RTP instance may have something to do with it. Maybe the ringtone from

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Oh scandalous Instead of playing the MOH, I would like to play the ringtone that is on the machine. Ummm, where is it? :) -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
I ran a test call with trace can be found here: http://pastebin.com/f8MuxaFV I also wanted to mention that yes we have * setup with disallow=all and allow=g729 for testing, maybe permanently if we can successfully setup G729 pass through. That being said, the same problem is still there using

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Asghar Mohammad
i have used a2billing some time ago maybe there is somthing new . you can try shoot up loglevel to 4 and see the verbose of agi that may give you some hint. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:34 PM, jg webaccou...@jgoettgens.de wrote: Maybe the ringtone from downstream is not reaching asterisk,

Re: [asterisk-users] No remote address on RTP instance - On Ringing

2013-09-10 Thread Nick Cameo
Yeah!!! The Dial command setting: http://forum.asterisk2billing.org/viewtopic.php?f=2t=1704 I know this is not an a2billing mailing list, and I am sorry however, I do think that the No remote address on RTP instance may have something to do with it. Maybe the ringtone from downstream is not