Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Matt Riddell
Sent: Friday, 6 November 2009 7:20 p.m.
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] OT - mISDN and B410P questions
On 25/10/09 11:52 AM, Paul
On 25/10/09 11:52 AM, Paul Hales wrote:
I have used both misdn and dahdi_bri over the last year, and would happy
take dahdi if for no other reason that it's much easier to install.
A patch is available to allow dahdi_bri to work with Asterisk 1.4, and I
have used that successfully.
Ooh
On 25/10/09 11:52 AM, Paul Hales wrote:
I have used both misdn and dahdi_bri over the last year, and would happy
take dahdi if for no other reason that it's much easier to install.
A patch is available to allow dahdi_bri to work with Asterisk 1.4, and I
have used that successfully.
Which
2009/10/24 Darrick Hartman dhart...@djhsolutions.com
Oliver,
I have some comments, but am looking for a good answer to this as well.
1). 2.6.27 kernels to include a version of mISDN v2.0. It's not as up
to date as the full version on the mISDN.org site.
that would be great if someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier a écrit :
|
|
| 2009/10/24 Jean-Denis Girard jd.gir...@sysnux.pf
| mailto:jd.gir...@sysnux.pf
|
| Olivier a écrit :
| | Hello,
| |
| | I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term
| | workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not
2009/10/24 Jean-Denis Girard jd.gir...@sysnux.pf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier a écrit :
| Hello,
|
| I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term
| workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are
| planning to do (we wish
Hello,
I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term workaround,
in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are planning to do (we
wish to use Junghanns and Digium BRI hardware with Asterisk 1.6) .
I've read www.mISDN.org but still have a couple of questions :
1. Is
Oliver,
I have some comments, but am looking for a good answer to this as well.
1). 2.6.27 kernels to include a version of mISDN v2.0. It's not as up
to date as the full version on the mISDN.org site.
2). From my understanding chan_lcr is the preferred way to connect
Asterisk to mISDN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier a écrit :
| Hello,
|
| I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term
| workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are
| planning to do (we wish to use Junghanns and Digium BRI hardware with
| Asterisk
I have used both misdn and dahdi_bri over the last year, and would happy
take dahdi if for no other reason that it's much easier to install.
A patch is available to allow dahdi_bri to work with Asterisk 1.4, and I
have used that successfully.
PaulH
On 25/10/09 03:26, Olivier wrote:
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:13:49AM -1000, Jean-Denis Girard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Olivier a écrit :
| Hello,
|
| I'm evaluating to possibility to use chan_misdn as a short term
| workaround, in case latest Dahdi is not stable enough for what we are
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tzafrir Cohen a écrit :
| In dahdi-linux trunk those cards should be supported by the wcbrxxp
| driver. Though I'd welcome more testing regarding those cards, as I
| specifically suspect that LED handling there is incorrect.
I think you mean wcb4xxp:
12 matches
Mail list logo
