2016-04-06 17:02 GMT+02:00 Dovid Bender :
> KVM on RH has been good for us.
>
Are you using something like PCI-passthrough to pass PCI cards to guest
machine ?
Has someone tried this ?
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Ryan, Travis
> wrote:
>
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 08:13:29PM +0700, Ikka Tirtawidjaja wrote:
> https://sysadminman.net/blog/2011/asterisk-virtualization-openvz-or-vmware-3004
>
>
> OpenVZ provides operating system-level virtualization where the underlying
> hardware runs a kernel that is shared by all of the virtual
Hello there Travis,
You can check the FREE VMware ESXi with Zero $$ Cost if you will not use
the enterprise frature google it. or the open source KVM both works great
to use in your asterisk production environment and easy of operation
management.
On Saturday, 9 April 2016, Ikka Tirtawidjaja
https://sysadminman.net/blog/2011/asterisk-virtualization-openvz-or-vmware-3004
OpenVZ provides operating system-level virtualization where the underlying
hardware runs a kernel that is shared by all of the virtual machines.
Where OpenVZ gets a bad name is that it’s very easy to provision many
Please dont use OpenVZ with asterisk.
My office once told me to make asterisk PBX with OpenVZ on Proxmox (I
forget about the version).
It run well when just < 20 SIP user register. It supposed to registered
about 400 sip user
But, when arround 50-60 SIP user registered to that server, the
If you want to use dahdi dummy driver inside asterisk for timer then this
is possible with openvz based container virtualization.
We have tested vicidial in this mode for 5-10 agents and it worked well.
Mitul Limbani
On Apr 8, 2016 8:52 AM, "Pete Mundy" wrote:
> List,
>
List,
Might as well throw my hat in the ring!
I can't say it's the 'best' way to do it, but I've been running Asterisk VMs
inside the free 'VirtualBox' software for many years with nill issues (well,
nill related to the hypervisor environment itself anyway!).
https://www.virtualbox.org
Pete
I have tried with xen and kvm both are working fine.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Loic Chabert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Work well with kvm and centos 7.
> Some ajustements has to be made with systemd.
>
> I'm using it in production since 1.5 year now, no issue to report.
>
Hello,
Work well with kvm and centos 7.
Some ajustements has to be made with systemd.
I'm using it in production since 1.5 year now, no issue to report.
Regards.
Le 6 avr. 2016 21:13, "Yves" a écrit :
Le 06/04/2016 18:12, Markos Vakondios a écrit :
Good evening,
My
Le 06/04/2016 18:12, Markos Vakondios a écrit :
Good evening,
My English is limited but if I can help.
We install Asterisk Version 13.1 on VmWare with Debian 8.2, no
problem since June 2015, currently I have tested on Unbutu 14.04 but
problem with network-manager (problem of stability with
Personally I am about to try asterisk on proxmox using containers since they
run code "native". I've had timing issues on conference calls (stutter) with
VMware esxi . Not sure about KVM I hope it's also better than esxi too.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 9:13 AM, Markos Vakondios
Proxmox and KVM on Ubuntu
On Wednesday, 6 April 2016, Ryan, Travis wrote:
> What is the best virtual server tech (and most stable, etc) to use for a
> asterisk virtual hosting environment?
>
>
>
> I have a client that wants to do virtual hosting of Asterisk (only SIP or
>
KVM on RH has been good for us.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Ryan, Travis wrote:
> What is the best virtual server tech (and most stable, etc) to use for a
> asterisk virtual hosting environment?
>
>
>
> I have a client that wants to do virtual hosting of Asterisk
What is the best virtual server tech (and most stable, etc) to use for a
asterisk virtual hosting environment?
I have a client that wants to do virtual hosting of Asterisk (only SIP or IAX,
no PRI, etc) and I'm wondering if Xen or something else would be best? We'd
like to stay away from the
...@lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Olivier
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2015 12:53 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations for IMAP Voicemail
Hello,
I'm currently studying what is needed to implement IMAP Voicemail
On Wednesday 13 May 2015, Olivier wrote:
2015-05-06 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tech Support aster...@voipbusiness.us:
I believe that when you choose to store voicemails using IMAP, it applies
to all of your users which may not be what you want to do.
Yes.
These days, voicemail storage type is still
Of A J Stiles
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:15 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for IMAP Voicemail
On Wednesday 13 May 2015, Olivier wrote:
2015-05-06 17:51 GMT+02:00 Tech Support aster...@voipbusiness.us:
I believe that when you choose
On 05/05/15 17:52, Olivier wrote:
2. From personal experience, would you rate an IMAP migration as an
easy or as a difficult task ?
By IMAP migration, I mean changing from one IMAP software to another,
on the same or on an other box.
There is software called 'imapsync' which will sync mail
imapsync seems a very interesting tool.
Thanks for sharing this.
Now I'm still curious to learn if moving from local file storage to cloud
IMAP storage is still resilient to short network outages (without IMAP
replication).
Regards
2015-05-06 10:18 GMT+02:00 Gareth Blades
With regard to your question about the imap store I highly suspect that
if it is unavailable when the message is saved then the message will be
lost. There are configuration options for the timeout and it might retry
a couple of times but Asterisk has no scheduling so I cannot see a way
for it
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Olivier
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 12:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for IMAP Voicemail
Hello,
I'm currently
Hello,
I'm currently studying what is needed to implement IMAP Voicemail with
Asterisk 11 and up.
More precisely, I would like to let users check voicemail with their
smartphone from outside (ie not connected to LAN).
My first questions are:
1. What happens if Asterisk cannot reach its
I'd like to protect my expensive Digium FXO cards from spikes on my
three incoming PSTN lines. Does anyone have any recommendations?
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On Thursday 27 June 2013, Eric Cooper wrote:
I'd like to protect my expensive Digium FXO cards from spikes on my
three incoming PSTN lines. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Does your telco not fit surge suppressors to the NTE as a matter of standard
practice? Perhaps we are spoiled in
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
On Thursday 27 June 2013, Eric Cooper wrote:
I'd like to protect my expensive Digium FXO cards from spikes on my
three incoming PSTN lines. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Does your telco not fit surge
On 06/27/2013 10:37 AM, Andrew Latham wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:34 AM, A J Stiles
asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote:
On Thursday 27 June 2013, Eric Cooper wrote:
I'd like to protect my expensive Digium FXO cards from spikes on my
three incoming PSTN lines. Does anyone have any
A J Stiles wrote:
On Thursday 27 June 2013, Eric Cooper wrote:
I'd like to protect my expensive Digium FXO cards from spikes on my
three incoming PSTN lines. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Does your telco not fit surge suppressors to the NTE as a matter of standard
practice? Perhaps
2013-02-15 22:32, Mc GRATH Ricardo skrev:
Hi John
How about Digium G100 G200 voip gateways?
You can try with a test drive at Digium web site
http://www1.digium.com/en/products/voip-gateways
Best regards.
Thank you!
Did you use them yourself? I've looked at the Digium gateways, and they
Hi,
Anyone who has experience with ISDN PRI voice gateways?
My customer wants to connect some E1 equipment to a gateway that
converts from ISDN PRI E1 to SIP/RTP. The data will be transmitted over
a WAN, and into an Asterisk-1.8 server.
It's one E1 on each site at 8 sites, and they are
Hi John
How about Digium G100 G200 voip gateways?
You can try with a test drive at Digium web site
http://www1.digium.com/en/products/voip-gateways
Best regards.
Mc GRATH Ricardo
E-Mail mcgra...@mail2web.com
--
_
-- Bandwidth
Hi All,
Can someone please recommend a FXS bank that support a minimum of 12 ports. I
would prefer an IP connection to Asterisk rather than a USB or physical card.
If an IP style is not available I'll consider a USB type. A card is not an
option.
Your recommendations would be greatly
Gradstream has a 24 port solution: GXW4024
Sangoma has a new solution for up to 50 ports: Vega5000
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 06:04 +, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
Hi All,
Can someone please recommend a FXS bank that support a minimum of 12
ports. I would prefer an IP connection to
, 2012 11:54 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations on FXS Bank
Gradstream has a 24 port solution: GXW4024
Sangoma has a new solution for up to 50 ports: Vega5000
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 06:04 +, Klaverstyn, David C wrote:
Hi
conversion so that might cause you some joy.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Todd Routhier
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
I am
@lists.digium.com
*Subject:* [asterisk-users] Recommendations
I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and have been for quite a while,
it has served me well.
Getting ready to build a new box to replace the existing installation
of Asterisk.
My primary use of the Asterisk box is run queues. I am sure
Millican
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:11 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either
1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes
@lists.digium.com
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
** **
On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either
1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a “feature” that was killing me
in 1.4, but if you
@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
If you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5 and either
1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a feature that was killing me in
1.4, but if you aren't doing IVR stuff
:* Monday, November 28, 2011 4:49 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
** **
Hmmm, so then nothing really major in regards to Queues has changed since
the version I am using 1.4.8?
You are actually recommending an older
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Todd Routhier wrote:
In regards to CentOS 5 then say 5.3 should be fine?
When you 'sudo yum -y upgrade' you will discover that you are then
magically running 5.7.
--
Thanks in advance,
-
Steve
8 comes before 42.
-
Doug Mortensen
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
.
From: Todd Routhier [mailto:fonema...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 3:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
Danny
Network Consultant
Impala Networks
P: 505.327.7300
.
** **
*From:* Todd Routhier [mailto:fonema...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, November 28, 2011 3:55 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Recommendations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I'm investigating the possibility of using Asterisk as much for internal
communication in an office as between offices and I would like to know
what considerations you could comment to me being based on the
experience that you have had.
A
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 06:30 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all!
I'm investigating the possibility of using Asterisk as much for internal
communication in an office as between offices and I would like to know
what considerations you could
audio code MP124
- Original Message -
From: Arturo Ochoa
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for Motel Instalation.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:42:28 -0600
Dear List,
I have a customer who owns a little Motel, and he wants to upgrade
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 01:47:47PM -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
I agree with using used chan banks off of Ebay, but I would not touch a
Zhone. I had one and sold it as soon as I could. They are a real PITA to
program and don't pass caller id.
Yeah, I gather they're a bit touchy to
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 03:42:28PM -0600, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
I have a customer who owns a little Motel, and he wants to upgrade to a
Asterisk PBX. There is one analog phone per room (aprox 80), and the cable
is CAT 3.
You might want to consider snagging an FXS channelbank off of eBay
Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 03:42:28PM -0600, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
I have a customer who owns a little Motel, and he wants to upgrade to a
Asterisk PBX. There is one analog phone per room (aprox 80), and the cable
is CAT 3.
You might want to consider
Dear List,
I have a customer who owns a little Motel, and he wants to upgrade to a
Asterisk PBX. There is one analog phone per room (aprox 80), and the cable
is CAT 3.
Any recommendations on what card to use?
TDM24XXP vs Channel Bank?
Regards,
Ing. Arturo Ochoa N
Electrosystems
80 rooms? I guess you and I have slightly differing opinions as to what
a small motel is. :)
If you have 80 analogue channels, then you'd need 4 TDM2400P cards.
Unless your server is powered by a small nuclear reactor, you'll be
better off with either 3 E1 or 4 T1 channels banks or 2 32
Am Montag, den 26.11.2007, 22:39 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 26, 2007 9:52 AM, Alberto Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also found the Pirelli DP-L10 dual phone to be an excellent sip client
with good roaming support and discrete battery saving capability.
(Used in a 14-cell
O == Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O 2. From this list, the WiFi hardphones which got only positive
O answers where Siemens Gigaset SL75 and Nokia EXX Series.
The Nokia SIP client isn't particularly impressive.
However, most of its problems can be solved by telling the phone to
use
Olivier wrote:
Hi,
1. Is your WiFi network dedicated to VoIP or shared with data applications ?
How was it designed ?
For people using WiFi with a laptop, you propably don't need to have dense
WiFi cells as moving from one cell should be scarce.
With hand phones, those cells should overlap
Benny Amorsen ha scritto:
O == Olivier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O 2. From this list, the WiFi hardphones which got only positive
O answers where Siemens Gigaset SL75 and Nokia EXX Series.
The Nokia SIP client isn't particularly impressive.
However, most of its problems can be solved
I would like to share some facts about wifi and wifi security vis-a-vis
wifi phones.
First off, it takes REAL time to negotiate the 4-way-handshake. Not
even thinking about the 802.1X authentication. Thus a person walking at
a normal rate, going through a door will find themselves
On Nov 26, 2007 9:52 AM, Alberto Pastore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also found the Pirelli DP-L10 dual phone to be an excellent sip client
with good roaming support and discrete battery saving capability.
(Used in a 14-cell wifi network with 40 cellphones).
I don't know what to say I have not
Hi all,
Im preparing a quote for a 5 Star hotel, planning to have around 100
SIP Wifi phones for PBX operations running on 100 AccessPoints.
Network is running in ARUBA Networks - AP70 access points.
The initial recommendation is to go for Hitachi Wifiphones, but i
would like to know from the
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:26:54 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Im preparing a quote for a 5 Star hotel, planning to have around 100
SIP Wifi phones for PBX operations running on 100 AccessPoints.
Network is running in ARUBA Networks - AP70 access points.
The initial recommendation is to
: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for 100 Wifi SIP phone setup
Hi all,
Im preparing a quote for a 5 Star hotel, planning to have around 100 SIP
Wifi phones for PBX operations running on 100 AccessPoints.
Network is running in ARUBA Networks - AP70 access points.
The initial recommendation
PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 3:26 PM
Subject: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for 100 Wifi SIP phone setup
Hi all,
Im preparing a quote for a 5 Star hotel, planning to have around 100
SIP
Hi,
1. Is your WiFi network dedicated to VoIP or shared with data applications ?
How was it designed ?
For people using WiFi with a laptop, you propably don't need to have dense
WiFi cells as moving from one cell should be scarce.
With hand phones, those cells should overlap as it becomes very
Hi,
I'm building a test asterisk server and building the latest kernel I got
to wonder if there are any specific recommendations about schedulers and
so forth for optimum performance.
There are a few areas that raise questions in my mind and I wonder if
anyone has any opinions/comments on
Alan Lord wrote:
I'm building a test asterisk server and building the latest kernel I got
to wonder if there are any specific recommendations about schedulers and
so forth for optimum performance.
There are a few areas that raise questions in my mind and I wonder if
anyone has any
The settings I use are as follows (with explanations):
SLAB Allocator (SLAB or SLUB?)
SLAB (the default).
I don't know enough about the differences between them to say whether one is
better than the other.
Tickless System (?)
Enabled.
Seems to be the default setting. Disabling it doesn't
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 12:26 -0400, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
Alan Lord wrote:
I'm building a test asterisk server and building the latest kernel I got
to wonder if there are any specific recommendations about schedulers and
so forth for optimum performance.
There are a few areas that
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:26:37PM -0400, Matthew J. Roth wrote:
(
1. The kernel version must be at least 2.6.13
3. The kernel must be configured to provide RTC interrupts
4. The kernel must be configured with enhanced real time clock support
)
Or:
2. The kernel must be configured
I wonder:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 05:33:07PM +0100, Chris Bagnall wrote:
The settings I use are as follows (with explanations):
Tickless System (?)
Enabled.
Seems to be the default setting. Disabling it doesn't seem to have any
noticeable effect on system performance.
Preemption
(sorry about the repost. I accidently had an unrelated subject in the
original)
Can anyone recommend a VoIP provider who supports LNP? I need to move to a
new provider for inbound calling and I want to keep my current numbers. My
current provider is a gaggle of retards.
Any recommendation?
On 4/17/07, Salvatore Giudice wrote:
(sorry about the repost. I accidently had an unrelated
subject in the original)
Can anyone recommend a VoIP provider who supports LNP?
I need to move to a new provider for inbound calling and I
want to keep my current numbers. My current provider is a
. Rainbow Blvd. #1676
Las Vegas, NV 89107
Phone: (702) 979-2906
Fax: (212) 279-2906
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baji
Panchumarti
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 6:15 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
PROTECTED]
To: Baji Panchumarti [EMAIL PROTECTED], Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:35:12 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for a voip provider who supports
LNP?
I need
From: Cory Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 10:35:13 PM
Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Recommendations for QoS, PoE Switches
Zeeshan - I really like the Adtran Netvanta
Hi David
Care to share how you approached using Diffserv and VLANs with the FSM7326P
We are considering the same switch. But I'm unsure about the configurations
required.
Thanks in advance
Barry
David Coulson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Typically we deploy the
Thanks for everybody's help.
Cory, thanks for the links. I once studied OSI model, many years ago, when I
was doing MCSE for Win NT. I'll go through these Cisco documents to
improve/update my knowledge about OSI layers and see how it can help me in
VoIP networking.
Hello List.I am looking to build an Asterisk Voicemail application to serve approx. 100 users.I will be building the Voicemail system using a standard Asterisk install on a stable Debian system.The system will house 100x20mb/each voicemail boxes.
On to my question:The Voicemail system will most
Once you've finished drooling over the UTStarcom you can start drooling
over the Linksys WIP330
http://ces.engadget.com/2006/01/07/linksys-wip330-in-da-house-but-you-cant-have-one/
VERY nice phone in my opinion.
Regards,
Rupert G
Philip Edelbrock wrote:
We're getting our feet more and
Has anyone tried out Hitachi IPC-5000 ?
It looks nice and it's a bit exensive, but I would still like to hear
how does it behave around Asterisk.
Ivan
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To
I have tried Zyxel P2000W , it works very fine.
- Original Message -
From: Asterisk-User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 3:23 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations
Philip Edelbrock wrote:
We're getting our feet more and more wet with VOIP at work. We want to
experiment with a good wireless (as in WiFi) phone. What would be a
good phone to impress my boss with?
depending on the needs, Kirk phones are very nice. They are DECT, but
they've got an own
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
Has anyone tried out Hitachi IPC-5000 ?
It looks nice and it's a bit exensive, but I would still like to hear
how does it behave around Asterisk.
Ivan
Rupert Gregory a écrit :
Once you've finished drooling over the UTStarcom you can start
drooling over the Linksys WIP330
http://ces.engadget.com/2006/01/07/linksys-wip330-in-da-house-but-you-cant-have-one/
VERY nice phone in my opinion.
I dunno... it looks like a cell phone, except it's
Another, much cheaper option is to get DECT phones and connect them to
IAXy's:
DECT-PHONE ((( * ))) DECT-BASEIAXy[=IAX2=]Asterisk- TheWorld(tm)
That's pretty much what I do at the moment, except that I connect the
phone to a Fritz!FonBox integrated 2 FXS SIP / DSL modem router.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
CC:
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
Sent: mar., 10 janv. 2006 13:17:02 GMT
Received: mar., 10 janv. 2006 13:18:11 GMT
Read: mar., 10 janv. 2006
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 05:17:02PM +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
[snippage]
I dunno... it looks like a cell phone, except it's not one. It would be
nice if it was a dual GSM / wifi phones which transparently switch to
VoIP when you have a strong enough signal. This way, it would provide
Original Message
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
From: Asterisk-User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, January 10, 2006 5:23 am
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Has anyone tried
Original Message
From: Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:17
PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
Rupert Gregory a écrit
?---
Guillaume de Lafontaine___ D W A M ___ -Original Message- From: Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com CC: Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *? Sent
http://www.paesys.com/en/GSM_Wi-Fi_phone_for_SIP_voice_and_data_GTEK_PWG500.htm
Yeah I've seen that one... to bad it looks like such a brick :(
Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
http://www.paesys.com/en/GSM_Wi-Fi_phone_for_SIP_voice_and_data_GTEK_P
WG500.htm
Yeah I've seen that one... to bad it looks like such a brick :(
Cheers,
Jean-Michel.
___
--Bandwidth
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Benjamin Lawetz
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:03 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
Actually got my hands
On 13:35, Tue 10 Jan 06, O'Connor, Jonathan wrote:
I've been looking around to see where I could get one, would solve a
problem we have quite nicely.
Where did you get yours if I may ask?
And how much are they if I may ask ?
--
Michiel van Baak
http://michiel.vanbaak.info
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, 2006 11:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
The zyxel p2000W
Works fine, good batt. Live.
Decent sound quality.
All in all a good product for about 150 euro's
-Original Message
2:45 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
We're getting our feet more and more wet with VOIP at work. We want to
experiment with a good wireless (as in WiFi) phone. What would be a
good phone to impress my boss with?
I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joash Herbrink
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 11:53 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
The zyxel p2000W
Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
I would be MUCH more tempted to use an IAXy or SIP adaptor
and a cordless phone. It will be less expensive and it will
likely work better.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
, January 11, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
Lots of great comments. Got me doing a lot of researching and thinking.
What I love is the ability to mix and match IAX and SIP devices on the
same system. A breath of fresh air compared to our
Has anyone tried out Hitachi IPC-5000 ?
It looks nice and it's a bit exensive, but I would still like to hear
how does it behave around Asterisk.
I used one for about 6 months. In general its well behaved with
Asterisk. It is a little tedious to get setup, but then you only need
to doit once.
We're getting our feet more and more wet with VOIP at work. We want to
experiment with a good wireless (as in WiFi) phone. What would be a
good phone to impress my boss with?
I'm personally drooling over the UTStarcom F3000, but compatibility and
shipping ETA info is a bit sketchy.
Edelbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:44 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Recommendations on a WiFi phone for *?
We're getting our feet more and more wet with VOIP at work. We want to
experiment with a good wireless (as in WiFi) phone. What
At 05:44 PM 01/09/2006, you wrote:
We're getting our feet more and more wet with VOIP at work. We want
to experiment with a good wireless (as in WiFi) phone. What would
be a good phone to impress my boss with?
I have the Zyxel P2000W V2 and while it has it's user interface
annoyances, it's
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo