Just as a follow up on this thread, I decided to go for the Digium 412P
quad port card.
Thanks to everyone who commented, positively and negatively - it helped
provide a balanced view in the end.
Julian.
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I know this is probably going to ignite the flames again ..
I have
On 10/5/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have looked at the recent threads regarding these two manufacturers,
but there didn't seem to be much *technical* differences between the 2,
it was rather more subjective - some people say Sangoma is better, some
say Digium. And quite
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I
On 10/6/07, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not use Dell. I have had issues with both Sangoma and Digium cards
on multiple brand-new Dell servers. This is the only vendor that has
consistently given me problems with telco-interface cards.
I'll have to refute this. Every single
Thanks Matt,
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below
On 10/6/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/07, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not use Dell. I have had issues with both Sangoma and Digium cards
on multiple brand-new Dell servers. This is the only vendor that has
consistently given me problems with
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matt,
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I know this is probably going to ignite the flames again ..
I have looked at the recent threads
Brian West wrote:
open market and an open platform. Rhino makes hardware that plugs into
zaptel but yet I don't see their drivers in the zaptel repo... I don't
see many of the third party hardware drivers in the zaptel repo.
Those drivers would be there (as are the Xorcom XPP drivers) if
Kevin,
Thats good to know. I'll keep that in mind.
Thanks,
Brian
PS: did you ever talk to mark about zaptel.h ?
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Those drivers would be there (as are the Xorcom XPP drivers) if they
were properly submitted and met our coding
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
They also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
software that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of
Digium vs Sangoma is very emotional for some. I see it as
competition is good and drives
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 13:06 +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I know this is probably going
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the purchase money to support Asterisk. And
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do. They
also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other software
that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of Digium vs
Sangoma is very emotional for some. I see it as competition
This is really a silly debate.
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
I read all the success and praises of Sangoma on this list and thought I
would give them a try. Guess
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate a couple of years ago, but that is the only thing I
can think of that has come through since I have been
I think Lee Howard nailed it.
/b
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
Not to ignite any fires, but I don't think I've *ever* knowingly
received a patch to libpri or chan_zap from them. And I've fixed a few
protocol related bugs in libpri for people with Sangoma cards. It'd be
nice if they at the very least supported the protocol
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the purchase money to
Lee Howard wrote:
Any Digium competitor is immediately on unequal footing with respect to
Asterisk due to the dual-license and requisite disclaiming of
contributions. You're asking those competitors to contribute not only
to the open-source Asterisk, but also to contribute to Digium's ABE
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:05 -0500, Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
They also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
software that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of
Digium vs Sangoma is very emotional for
Lee Howard wrote:
The report appears to have been reaped from Mantis, but I was involved
with a contribution from OpenVOX for zaptel, and from my perspective it
looked like the Digium staff involved killed it and never gave any
indication that the contribution would be accepted.
I assume
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
(Let me take off my Digium hat for a minute and speak as a community
member,
, 2007 8:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do. They
also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
Hi, all:
I think everybody is entitled to their biases, and I have to say that --
far from seeing this as a flame-war or otherwise tedious -- I think it's
great that we're having this discussion and getting open and honest
input from Digium staffers. We want to hear your thoughts and feelings
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate a couple
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate
Jared Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
(Let me take off my Digium hat for a minute and speak as
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of Asterisk
as much as I do for or against Sangoma or Rhino or one of the Chinese knock
offs in support of Asterisk. Digium uses the open source community to
create better
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:26:58PM -0500, Lacy Moore wrote:
I was completely against the dual licensing in the beginning. But now, I'm
leaning more towards understanding it and the importance of it, especially
as it related to US Patent laws. We're going to find that everything is
patented
The distinction doesn't matter because in the end they can do what
ever they want with the code you disclaim to them. The whole thing
is very political and pointless to hash over and over again.
/b
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
When you contribute code to Asterisk,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:52:24PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of Asterisk
as much as I do for or against Sangoma or Rhino or one of the Chinese knock
offs in support of
, 2007 11:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Jared Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky
On Friday 05 October 2007 15:08:56 Brian West wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
When you contribute code to Asterisk, you retain ownership of your
code. You
are NOT disclaiming the contribution; you are LICENSING the
contribution.
This is an important legal
On Friday 05 October 2007 15:20:19 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:52:24PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of
Asterisk as much as I do for or against Sangoma or
Brian West wrote:
I think the horse has been long dead!
/b
Yeah, and while we're on such things, I think that vi beats the pants
off of emacs :-)
--
Matthew Fredrickson
Software/Firmware Engineer
Digium, Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
I think the horse has been long dead!
/b
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
Yeah, and while we're on such things, I think that vi beats the pants
off of emacs :-)
vim to be precise. but on the other hand
emacs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMac)
can run asterisk - vim can't. :-P
Cheers,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 -
Steve Totaro wrote:
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the
40 matches
Mail list logo
