Hi Jeff,
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:18:53PM -0500, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Hoping for some clarification. I would like to setup a NORMAL (not
T.38) fax machine on an ATA, and have the ATA be a T.38 gateway to a
remote asterisk (1.8) server, which is doing T.38 relay (passthru)
to a
] T.38 gateway ATA
Hoping for some clarification. I would like to setup a NORMAL (not
T.38) fax machine on an ATA, and have the ATA be a T.38 gateway to a
remote asterisk (1.8) server, which is doing T.38 relay (passthru) to a
provider.
Some amount of googling today seems to imply that most
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
*Subject*: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway ATA
Hoping for some clarification. I would like to setup a NORMAL (not
T.38) fax machine on an ATA, and have the ATA be a T.38 gateway to a
remote asterisk (1.8) server, which is doing T.38
From: Jeff LaCoursiere j...@sunfone.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:05 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway ATA
On 09/25/2012 09:26 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Jeff
Can you please clarify your
On 09/25/2012 10:34 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:11:27AM -0500, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Aha! That is what I am looking for. What firmware rev are you
using on the 3102?
5.1.12 on SPA8000, 5.1.10(GW) on SPA3102, there is probably new releases
from Cisco, at
I would recommend the OBI110.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
http://www.asterisk.org/hello
From: Jeff LaCoursiere j...@sunfone.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:35 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway ATA
On 09/25/2012 10:29 AM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote
From: Jeff LaCoursiere j...@sunfone.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:40 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway ATA
On 09/25/2012 10:34 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10
On 09/25/2012 10:44 AM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
I would recommend the OBI110.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
LaCoursiere
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:49 PM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway ATA
On 09/25/2012 10:44
Jeff
The grandstream units support both Relay and passthru depending on how you
set them up.
Thanks
Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)
616-855-1030 Ext. 2003
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
On 09/25/2012 03:02 PM, Bryant Zimmerman wrote:
Jeff
The grandstream units support both Relay and passthru depending on how
you set them up.
Thanks
Bryant Zimmerman (ZK Tech Inc.)
616-855-1030 Ext. 2003
--
_
-- Bandwidth
Hoping for some clarification. I would like to setup a NORMAL (not
T.38) fax machine on an ATA, and have the ATA be a T.38 gateway to a
remote asterisk (1.8) server, which is doing T.38 relay (passthru) to a
provider.
Some amount of googling today seems to imply that most ATAs are just
Hi everyone,
we're trying to setup a fax gateway from PRI to SIP. Our test setup
consists of two asterisk 10 machines connected over PRI and a third one
which is acting as a fax endpoint over SIP.
On the machine which is receiving over PRI, we see the following message:
[Jul 23 12:54:23]
On 07/23/2012 06:30 AM, Paul Goldbaum wrote:
Hi everyone,
we're trying to setup a fax gateway from PRI to SIP. Our test setup
consists of two asterisk 10 machines connected over PRI and a third one
which is acting as a fax endpoint over SIP.
This 'third' system is the one responsible for
http://www.linuxsystems.it/2012/03/new-t-38-gateway-patch-against-asterisk-1-8-11-0/
I made a new patch from irroot's branch and I ported it to 1.8.11.
Unfortunately latest one is still against 1.8.8 and porting from
subversion is quite time consuming, hopefully my work will be useful to
What does this patch fix? Why is it not in Jarr?
Thanks
Bryant
From: Niccolò Belli darkba...@linuxsystems.it
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:19 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] T.38 gateway patch against Asterisk 1.8.11.0
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Bryant Zimmerman brya...@zktech.comwrote:
What does this patch fix? Why is it not in Jarr?
Thanks
Bryant
It looks like the patch is a backport of the t.38 gateway functionality in
Asterisk 1.10.
Ryan
--
Il 30/03/2012 19:29, Ryan Wagoner ha scritto:
It looks like the patch is a backport of the t.38 gateway functionality
in Asterisk 1.10.
Yes it's a backport from asterisk 10, asterisk 1.8 does not have the t38
gateway functionality and there is no chance to get t38 gw in 1.8 at
this point.
Il 30/03/2012 19:16, Bryant Zimmerman ha scritto:
Why is it not in Jarr?
Ok I linked it in jira, anyway I don't know how many peoples still
follow the old bug report considering it has been closed.
Niccolò
--
_
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
