On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Rizha Yuherdianto wrote:
3) im root
Glad to meet you.
:D
If you meant the user running Asterisk is root, this is a less than
optimal
situation that can lead to really big problems.
Why? Steve please explain.
Well, if an attacker
If you meant the user running Asterisk is root, this is a less than
optimal
situation that can lead to really big problems.
Why? Steve please explain.
Well, if an attacker manages to inject some code and Asterisk is running
as root, poof goes your system or you get an
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Rizha Yuherdianto wrote:
any link for me so i can learn more about security practices with
asterisk? i'm using a public ip.
I think John Todd did a doc that is included with Asterisk.
http://nerdvittles.com/ has had a couple of recent articles on security.
There was a
Dear All,
I've got this Warning message on my log:
WARNING[3741]: res_phoneprov.c:923 set_config: Unable to load users.conf
what is this mean? thank you.
--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Rizha Yuherdianto wrote:
I've got this Warning message on my log:
WARNING[3741]: res_phoneprov.c:923 set_config: Unable to load users.conf
what is this mean? thank you.
I'm just a 1.2 Luddite, but I'd guess:
0) It's just a warning so it may not be a big deal.
1) The
Thank you Steve,
I'm using AsteriskNow latest version 2.0.2.
my answer is:
0) if its just a warning, how to get it fixed?
1) checked, it is not exist. is it exist by default?
2) what directory it should be?
3) im root
4) the file doesn't exist
Thanks
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:18 AM,
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012, Rizha Yuherdianto wrote:
0) if its just a warning, how to get it fixed?
It doesn't really need to. A 'warning' is like saying here's something
you should be aware of.
Personally, I prefer to resolve all warnings so there is less cruft to
sift through when something
0) if its just a warning, how to get it fixed?
It doesn't really need to. A 'warning' is like saying here's something
you should be aware of.
Personally, I prefer to resolve all warnings so there is less cruft to
sift through when something actually does go wrong.
I see
1)
