Thanks a lot all,
Now my view is clear ...
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Gordon Henderson
gordon+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011, virendra bhati wrote:
Hi List,
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number
On 05/29/2011 04:57 AM, virendra bhati wrote:
And why SIP is used for making calls rather then IAX? Even we know
IAX takes 1 channel for making calls?
IAX is an Asterisk-centered phenomenon and has no currency outside of
it. In the broader VoIP world, interoperability with a wide range of
On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 13:57 +0530, virendra bhati wrote:
Thanks a lot all,
Now my view is clear ...
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Gordon Henderson gordon
+aster...@drogon.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011, virendra bhati wrote:
Hi List,
Hi List,
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
And why SIP is used for making calls rather then IAX? Even we know IAX takes
1 channel for making calls?
-
Thanks and regards
Virendra Bhati
Sunday, May 29, 2011, 10:57:00 AM, virendra wrote:
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
Yes, because of much more channels. But if you need only 2 or 4
channels BRI is cheaper. From 10-12
On Sun, 29 May 2011, virendra bhati wrote:
Hi List,
I have stupid question but I want to know it. Why we use the PRI insted of
BRI ? Just for the sake of number of lines or any thing else ?
It probably depends on your country.
In mainland europe (or maybe just Germany), ISDN2e (BRI) is very
