Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:50:18 -0800
From: bilmar...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Credit Card processing machines
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
CC: listas_quij...@hotmail.com
And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
The user was able to dial his card number
Why not Asterisk?
And if need to use RS232, then ethernet is not possible? So how u will use AGI
with RS232?
Regards
Bilal
--- On Thu, 2/19/09, Edwin Quijada listas_quij...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Edwin Quijada listas_quij...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Credit Card processing machines
To:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, bilal ghayyad wrote:
So how u will use AGI with RS232?
While an AGI can talk to /dev/ttySx, it would make more sense to write a
daemon to manage the conversations and then your AGIs could talk to the
daemon over TCP, shared memory, pipes, two cans and some string...
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:25:50 -0800
From: bilmar...@yahoo.com
Subject: RE: Credit Card processing machines
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; listas_quij...@hotmail.com
Why not Asterisk?
And if need to use RS232, then ethernet is not possible? So how u will use
AGI with RS232?
Really once I read credit card, I got to become interested to know whatis
exactly happenning.
I am looking to have the possibility to pay to the bank using the VoIP adaptor
or IP Telephony, by entering the credit card digits and the password and the
amound.
I do not know if u can help me in
On 17 Feb 2009, at 19:20, David Gibbons wrote:
snip
We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our
tests will
tell!
/snip
We do *fax*
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:02:28AM +, Tim Panton wrote:
Our creditcard company's small print _insists_ on a direct analog
exchange line with no other devices in between.
Wow. You have a direct copper wire to their credit card processing
system? :-)
--
Tzafrir Cohen
You shoudl start with your bank. They can probably provide the equipment.
j
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, bilal ghayyad wrote:
Really once I read credit card, I got to become interested to know whatis
exactly happenning.
I am looking to have the possibility to pay to the bank using the VoIP
Our creditcard company's small print _insists_ on a direct analog
exchange line
with no other devices in between.
Tim.
Tim Panton - Web/VoIP consultant and implementor
www.westhawk.co.uk
You can do it an interface using AGI to comunicate with equipment or verifone.
I did it
And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
The user was able to dial his card number and the amount from his phone (or IP
Phone registered with Asterisk), and Asterisk communicate with the bank or
company credit card provider?
How the user will enter $50.25?
What about
Ideally the person needs to enter the credit card number, expiration date in
mmyy format (which is the format in which the expiration date is shown on
the card), and the ccv number. The amount would probably be calculated on
the basis of the outstanding amounts, or the products selected. Think
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50, bilal ghayyad bilmar...@yahoo.com wrote:
And is there a bank accept to give such kind of communication?
The user was able to dial his card number and the amount from his phone (or
IP Phone registered with Asterisk), and Asterisk communicate with the bank or
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
machines to Linksys 2102s and
The ADT alarm going thru VoIP will create a life safety issue. Hope you
planned for that..
--Don
On 2/17/09 6:31 AM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Anyone have much
Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
trunk that was already in place.
j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Don E. Wisdom
snip
Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
trunk that was already in place.
/snip
Yes -- our alarm monitoring company
David Gibbons wrote:
snip
Certainly a sobering thought. Have others had to deal with this in PBX
replacement scenarios? Its a giant cost savings in this case - they are
dropping about 12 POTS lines in favor of utilizing (an underutilized) T1
trunk that was already in place.
/snip
Yes --
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jon Pounder wrote:
Yes -- our alarm monitoring company considers T1 - * - ATA - Alarm
to be so unreliable that they require you to sign a waiver
(indemnifying them in the event of basically anything) if you hook it
up this way. Because of that we kept a POTS line
snip
We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our tests will
tell!
/snip
We do *fax* in this way and it works like a charm. We can hit much
On Feb 17, 2009, at 1:20 PM, David Gibbons wrote:
snip
We will be testing the ADT connection heavily this week. The modem
connections to my understanding are 2400 baud. Over G.711U and a T1 I
don't see why this wouldn't be as solid as a POTS line, but our
tests will
tell!
/snip
We
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
modem to communicate with alarm central.
Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems like that could be made
solid
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 15:09, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
modem to communicate with alarm central.
Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
You mean
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jerry Jones wrote:
Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
modem to communicate with alarm central.
Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Andrew Joakimsen wrote:
Most alarm systems around here use bursts of dtmf - not an actual
modem to communicate with alarm central.
Yes I have seen these have many issues with voip in the path.
You mean they communicate with an IVR? Seems like that could be made
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is NOT ok to use for this. It is in the
NFPA.
What is the NFPA? Do analog extensions in traditional PBXes count?
j
National fire protection association
They write the fire codes.
http://www.nfpa.org
On 2/17/09 1:28 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is
Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jonn Taylor wrote:
If you are in the US, ANY life safety system has to be connected to a
dedicated copper POTS line. VOIP is NOT ok to use for this. It is in the
NFPA.
What is the NFPA? Do analog extensions in traditional PBXes
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 17:11, Jeff LaCoursiere j...@jeff.net wrote:
Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
machines to Linksys 2102s and they are very flaky. Using u-law on a 100Mb
On 7/02/2009 11:54 a.m., Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
A bit of hopefully happy news - the Linksys 2102 has a feature called
modem pass through mode which can be accessed by prepending *99 to the
call. Anyone ever used this? Sounds like that might help with faxing as
well...
Not tried, but I
Anyone have much luck with these on ATA's? I have a few sites that use
them succesfully with multi-port Audiocodes boxes, but just connected ten
machines to Linksys 2102s and they are very flaky. Using u-law on a 100Mb
switched network that is barely utilized, then out a T1 on a Sangoma
A bit of hopefully happy news - the Linksys 2102 has a feature called
modem pass through mode which can be accessed by prepending *99 to the
call. Anyone ever used this? Sounds like that might help with faxing as
well...
j
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
Anyone have much
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Ruddy Gbaguidi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
We have a service that can be use by our customer via a website and also
via telephone.
[...]
Do you know any company that do this ??
I recently completed implementing such an application - integrated
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Ruddy Gbaguidi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Guys
On the website, we already accept credit card by sending users to paypal
website where we have an account.
PayPal does have a service that is more like a traditional merchant
service. I don't know if they have a
Hi Guys
We have a service that can be use by our customer via a website and also
via telephone.
On the website, we already accept credit card by sending users to paypal
website where we have an account.
Now, we want to do the same with an IVR where people can call a number,
enter their credit
I might want something like this to, hmm.
On Sep 27, 2008, at 2:52 PM, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
Hi Guys
We have a service that can be use by our customer via a website and
also
via telephone.
On the website, we already accept credit card by sending users to
paypal
website where we have
Most credit card processing gateways require you to have the user's name and
address for AVS verification when you perform customer not present
transactions. Easy enough to do over a website, but a bit more tricky on the
phone.
If these are for repeat orders, how about getting the user to
that would work for what i might use it for but not required right
now...
On Sep 27, 2008, at 3:16 PM, Chris Bagnall wrote:
Most credit card processing gateways require you to have the user's
name and address for AVS verification when you perform customer not
present transactions. Easy
Yes, we can do that. But :
1. we are not too confortabe about keeping users credit card
informations in our databases
2. we are now targeting the 50, 60+ people and their are not confortable
about a website. So, we want to
be able to register people by phone, and they can make payments by phone.
or what about if you took credit card, and billing zip code would
there be any processors that would let you do that, maybe the 3-4
digit security code on the back of the card?
mike with just some ideas.
On Sep 27, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Ruddy Gbaguidi wrote:
Yes, we can do that. But :
1. we
39 matches
Mail list logo
