Wow. I wasn't expecting such a voluminous reply -- some I agree with and
some I don't.
My apologies for an equally voluminous reply.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Tony Plack wrote:
We're not discussing code or the inner workings of Asterisk or even
changing the functionality of Asterisk, just what
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed to the alternative. The alternative
(verb-noun) works fine for the above referenced applications and many more.
Do you want to tally the number of users of applications that use
noun-verb
On Wednesday December 19 2007 6:09 pm, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed to the alternative. The
alternative (verb-noun) works fine for the above referenced applications
and many more. Do you want to
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed to the alternative. The alternative
(verb-noun) works fine for the above referenced applications and many more.
Do you want to tally the number of
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed to the alternative. The alternative
(verb-noun) works fine for the above referenced applications and many more.
Do you want to tally the number of users of
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, John Millican wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed to the alternative. The
alternative (verb-noun) works fine for the above referenced applications
and many more. Do you want to tally the number of
10:46 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] noun-verb vs verb-noun aka dogs black vs black
dogs
On Wednesday December 19 2007 6:09 pm, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:47:39PM -0800, Steve Edwards wrote:
This only works because you are closed
