Just as a follow up on this thread, I decided to go for the Digium 412P
quad port card.
Thanks to everyone who commented, positively and negatively - it helped
provide a balanced view in the end.
Julian.
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I know this is probably going to ignite the flames again ..
I have
On 10/5/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have looked at the recent threads regarding these two manufacturers,
but there didn't seem to be much *technical* differences between the 2,
it was rather more subjective - some people say Sangoma is better, some
say Digium. And quite
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I
On 10/6/07, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not use Dell. I have had issues with both Sangoma and Digium cards
on multiple brand-new Dell servers. This is the only vendor that has
consistently given me problems with telco-interface cards.
I'll have to refute this. Every single
Thanks Matt,
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below
On 10/6/07, Erik Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/6/07, Matt Florell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not use Dell. I have had issues with both Sangoma and Digium cards
on multiple brand-new Dell servers. This is the only vendor that has
consistently given me problems with
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matt,
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would
Matt Florell wrote:
On 10/6/07, Julian Lyndon-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to install the new card in a dell 2850 or 2950 or possibly even a
HP DL360. Anyone have some comments on this ?
Do not use Dell. I have had issues with both Sangoma and Digium cards
on multiple brand-new
Brian West wrote:
open market and an open platform. Rhino makes hardware that plugs into
zaptel but yet I don't see their drivers in the zaptel repo... I don't
see many of the third party hardware drivers in the zaptel repo.
Those drivers would be there (as are the Xorcom XPP drivers) if
Kevin,
Thats good to know. I'll keep that in mind.
Thanks,
Brian
PS: did you ever talk to mark about zaptel.h ?
On Oct 5, 2007, at 8:12 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Those drivers would be there (as are the Xorcom XPP drivers) if they
were properly submitted and met our coding
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
They also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
software that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of
Digium vs Sangoma is very emotional for some. I see it as
competition is good and drives
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 13:06 +0100, Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Julian Lyndon-Smith wrote:
Nothing from me is posting to the list either.
heh. Thought that this trick would work: it did for Doug.
I've been trying to send the email below for 3 days now !
I know this is probably going
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the purchase money to support Asterisk. And
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do. They
also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other software
that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of Digium vs
Sangoma is very emotional for some. I see it as competition
This is really a silly debate.
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
I read all the success and praises of Sangoma on this list and thought I
would give them a try. Guess
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate a couple of years ago, but that is the only thing I
can think of that has come through since I have been
I think Lee Howard nailed it.
/b
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
Not to ignite any fires, but I don't think I've *ever* knowingly
received a patch to libpri or chan_zap from them. And I've fixed a few
protocol related bugs in libpri for people with Sangoma cards. It'd be
nice if they at the very least supported the protocol
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the purchase money to
Lee Howard wrote:
Any Digium competitor is immediately on unequal footing with respect to
Asterisk due to the dual-license and requisite disclaiming of
contributions. You're asking those competitors to contribute not only
to the open-source Asterisk, but also to contribute to Digium's ABE
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 08:05 -0500, Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
They also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
software that is capable of using their hardware. This argument of
Digium vs Sangoma is very emotional for
Lee Howard wrote:
The report appears to have been reaped from Mantis, but I was involved
with a contribution from OpenVOX for zaptel, and from my perspective it
looked like the Digium staff involved killed it and never gave any
indication that the contribution would be accepted.
I assume
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
(Let me take off my Digium hat for a minute and speak as a community
member,
, 2007 8:09 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do. They
also have contributed to Yate, FreeSWITCH and various other
Hi, all:
I think everybody is entitled to their biases, and I have to say that --
far from seeing this as a flame-war or otherwise tedious -- I think it's
great that we're having this discussion and getting open and honest
input from Digium staffers. We want to hear your thoughts and feelings
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate a couple
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Brian West wrote:
Sangoma has contributed to Asterisk in the past and they still do.
Which contributions are you talking about, exactly? I know that they paid
someone to write app_dictate
Jared Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky behavior with regards to echo, clicks, incompatible
motherboards and IRQ issues.
(Let me take off my Digium hat for a minute and speak as
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of Asterisk
as much as I do for or against Sangoma or Rhino or one of the Chinese knock
offs in support of Asterisk. Digium uses the open source community to
create better
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:26:58PM -0500, Lacy Moore wrote:
I was completely against the dual licensing in the beginning. But now, I'm
leaning more towards understanding it and the importance of it, especially
as it related to US Patent laws. We're going to find that everything is
patented
The distinction doesn't matter because in the end they can do what
ever they want with the code you disclaim to them. The whole thing
is very political and pointless to hash over and over again.
/b
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
When you contribute code to Asterisk,
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:52:24PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of Asterisk
as much as I do for or against Sangoma or Rhino or one of the Chinese knock
offs in support of
, 2007 11:35 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Sangoma vs Digium: (was Re: ping too)
Jared Smith wrote:
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
I used to buy Digium products until they let me down with all kinds of
quirky
On Friday 05 October 2007 15:08:56 Brian West wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 2:52 PM, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
When you contribute code to Asterisk, you retain ownership of your
code. You
are NOT disclaiming the contribution; you are LICENSING the
contribution.
This is an important legal
On Friday 05 October 2007 15:20:19 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:52:24PM -0500, Tilghman Lesher wrote:
On Friday 05 October 2007 12:52:41 shadowym wrote:
I disagree with any argument for or against Digium in support of
Asterisk as much as I do for or against Sangoma or
Brian West wrote:
I think the horse has been long dead!
/b
Yeah, and while we're on such things, I think that vi beats the pants
off of emacs :-)
--
Matthew Fredrickson
Software/Firmware Engineer
Digium, Inc.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation
I think the horse has been long dead!
/b
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
Yeah, and while we're on such things, I think that vi beats the pants
off of emacs :-)
vim to be precise. but on the other hand
emacs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EMac)
can run asterisk - vim can't. :-P
Cheers,
Philipp Kempgen
--
amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 -
Steve Totaro wrote:
Thomas Kenyon wrote:
Steve Murphy wrote:
Oh, Julian, I'd imagine what I'm about to say will fuel some flames!
Here's a fairly powerful argument for all you asterisk users, as to why
you
should purchase a Digium product vs. a Sangoma: Because Digium uses a
chunk
of the
-
From: Max W Blackmer Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 5:46 AM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
spending over $A10,000 in the process. The cards are more expensive
Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 04/01/05 00:00 Matthew Boehm said the following:
Steve Underwood wrote:
And your EU bias is clearly demonstrated by this. I've never seen a
BRI product outside he EU. :-)
Come to Houston, TX. We were running a BRI for quite some time before
upgrading to a T1.
ahem, ISDN
Depends what you mean by in use. You will find BRI listed as a service
option in most countries. including China and the US. Installed lines
is different matter. They are so rare in most places that if you order
one it will be the technician's first install, and they will have enough
problems
spending over $A10,000 in the process. The cards are more expensive than
the server they're going into (Dell poweredge 750's). When a GPL'd hardware
It is obvious that you have never experienced high end servers. We have
had a single server cost as much as $20,000 and that is nothing but
high
Technically speaking not. But Sangoma's support seems to be pretty
much
better.
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're
putting the dagger to Digium. They're glad to use Asterisk as a
selling point for their hardware, but unwilling to donate anything
back to the
What about pricing of the Sangoma compared to Digium, is it comparable?
about the same. last i checked the digium te410 was $1599 and the
4-port e1/t1 card from sangom was $1699.
Can Sangoma card handle modem data incoming calls at all?
iirc, modem data is just voice/noise :P.
roy
cpu load on te4xxp cards is very low, and now that they have echo
cancellers as add-ons cards, it will be even lower.
I can't speak on hardware compatibility as i never tried a sangoma
card.
(But i can say that in the last year i've never had an issue with
digium
cards and we have 8 in use.) The
-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
Technically speaking not. But Sangoma's support seems to be pretty
much better.
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're
putting the dagger to Digium. They're glad to use Asterisk as a
selling
Hi,
Digium, the service is problematic. Well, I believe that Digium should
services it's channels, the channels should support the resellers and the
resellers should support
The customers. I don't think that any company, no matter what its size or
function is, could support the end users.
Matteo,
I don't know much about DIgium, but I am comparing the distribution policy with
what exists elsewhere in the market and other sectors.
Digium do sell online and so many other of their resellers do. The important
point is that they don't sell lower cost than their resellers, which is the
Hi,
Il giorno gio, 07-04-2005 alle 13:02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Digium do sell online and so many other of their resellers do. The important
point is that they don't sell lower cost than their resellers, which is the
case.
Please find an hardware producer that sells directly to
Yes,
Most hardware manufacturers I know sell directly at retail price.
In voip Business and from my experience, you can order Quintum gateways from
Quintum Technologies right away at retail price. You can always get them
cheaper from reseller. GSM devices manufacturers sell direct as well
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
I hate to say that, but the problem is that Digium doesn't do this.
They allow resellers to do market dumping, by not imposing fixed
list prices to resellers, they also compete with they're own
distributors/resellers by offering the cards online
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 13:26 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,
Most hardware manufacturers I know sell directly at retail price.
Most I know/dealt with don't (but hey, I don't really deal with
'hardware manufacturers'... I'm probably more of a retail customer
In voip Business and from
Lol - Cisco for one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matteo
Brancaleoni
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS
On Apr 7, 2005 6:20 AM, Matteo Brancaleoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sangoma doesn't do that. they don't sell directly, thus allowing
resellers to have a money gain and pay the time to support the end
user.
Actually, they do sell directly. I emailed them a short time ago, and
they gave me
Peter Svensson wrote:
Resellers are almost universally a useless money-sink. Most add no value
at all, they are simply another logistics point. Distributors, on the
other hand, are usually very knowlegable and are able to support their
customers (the resellers) quite well.
My advice: always
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matteo,
I don't know much about DIgium, but I am comparing the distribution policy with
what exists elsewhere in the market and other sectors.
Digium do sell online and so many other of their resellers do. The important
point is that they don't sell lower cost than their
On Apr 7, 2005, at 4:11, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
Please find an hardware producer that sells directly to endusers, when
they have also distributors/resellers.
Apple.
The way is: if you have resellers, sell through them. if not directly
to
end user.
Ever been to an Apple store?
Thorsten
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
I hate to say that, but the problem is that Digium doesn't do this.
They allow resellers to do market dumping, by not imposing fixed
list prices
On April 7, 2005 01:53 pm, Craig Guy wrote:
the server they're going into (Dell poweredge 750's). When a GPL'd
hardware design costs more than an entire proprietary server (including
chassis, motherboard, dual hard disks and remote access card) then there is
something very wrong in the
On April 7, 2005 01:53 pm, Craig Guy wrote:
the server they're going into (Dell poweredge 750's). When a GPL'd
hardware design costs more than an entire proprietary server (including
chassis, motherboard, dual hard disks and remote access card) then there is
something very wrong in the
- Original Message -
From: Peter Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
I hate to say
Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
I hate to say that, but the problem is that Digium doesn't do this.
Ahh I beg to differ.
I resell both Digium and Sangoma gear and provide full installation
support for both.
--
Cheers,
Matt Riddell
___
Hi
Il giorno ven, 08-04-2005 alle 10:24 +1200, Matt Riddell ha scritto:
Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:
I hate to say that, but the problem is that Digium doesn't do this.
Ahh I beg to differ.
I resell both Digium and Sangoma gear and provide full installation
support for both.
after a lot
On 04/01/05 00:00 Matthew Boehm said the following:
Steve Underwood wrote:
And your EU bias is clearly demonstrated by this. I've never seen a
BRI product outside he EU. :-)
Come to Houston, TX. We were running a BRI for quite some time before
upgrading to a T1.
ahem, ISDN BRIs are fairly
BRI's are in use in roughly 2/3 of the world with the US and I think
China being the main exceptions.
On Apr 4, 2005 9:37 AM, Dinesh Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/01/05 00:00 Matthew Boehm said the following:
Steve Underwood wrote:
And your EU bias is clearly demonstrated by
On Mar 31, 2005 1:44 PM, Dana Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:37:19 -0600, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium it'll be
Eric Wrote:
Digium has a hardware echo can?
Not shipping, according to their online store.
Crap!, I spend all my time reading emails from this list, now I have to
check Digium's online store twice a day so I can get my hands on one of
those cards!!
Chris.
I have been told the Digium echo cancellation product will be shipping
soon, as well as a new version of the IAXy, which looks to have a new
form factor, I'm guessing to help with heat dissipation on the units.
Cory Andrews
Senior Partner
+++
VOIPSupply.com
A Subsidiary of b2
-Original Message-
From: Scott Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps you have an earlier hardware revision than I do; I also have
never rebooted the system. I have two TDM04Bs.
If so, they must have sold me old stock. I bought the cards less than two
months ago.
David Brodbeck wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Scott Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps you have an earlier hardware revision than I do; I also have
never rebooted the system. I have two TDM04Bs.
If so, they must have sold me old stock. I bought the cards less than two
months
Isamar Maia wrote:
Technically speaking not. But Sangoma's support seems to be pretty much
better.
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're putting
the dagger to Digium. They're glad to use Asterisk as a selling point
for their hardware, but unwilling to donate
Isamar Maia wrote:
I don't understand this *love* for Digium. Digium is a commercial
institution, period.
Yes, but. They are a commercial institution which took an enormous risk
by giving away for free what is undeniably their most valuable product.
It was a gamble, as it were, of the family
Isamar Maia wrote:
I don't understand this *love* for Digium. Digium is a commercial
institution, period.
Yes, but. They are a commercial institution which took an enormous risk
by giving away for free what is undeniably their most valuable product.
So, if Linus Torvalds had a
True. I think Digium's USA bias is clearly demonstrated by their lack
of a BRI ISDN product. Most of the rest of the world use it in
abudnace yet Digium do not see fit to service this market because it
is not big in the US. very poor...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:32:40 +0900 (JST), Isamar Maia
2:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
Isamar Maia wrote:
Technically speaking not. But Sangoma's support seems to be pretty much
better.
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're putting
can feel a little less-bad about
buying those Sangoma cards now.
MATT---
-Original Message-
From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 2:43 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
On Thursday 31 March 2005 02:43, Brian Capouch wrote:
Isamar Maia wrote:
Technically speaking not. But Sangoma's support seems to be pretty much
better.
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're putting
the dagger to Digium. They're glad to use Asterisk as a selling
On March 30, 2005 10:26 pm, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:
It is obvious that Asterisk/TDM support from Sangoma is (and has been)
secondary. Their cards support data like no other. Excellent. Voice,
on the other hand, appears to be immature.
I respectfully disagree. Sangoma's voice
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Eric Bishop wrote:
True. I think Digium's USA bias is clearly demonstrated by their lack
of a BRI ISDN product. Most of the rest of the world use it in
abudnace yet Digium do not see fit to service this market because it
is not big in the US. very poor...
Why on earth
cpu load on te4xxp cards is very low, and now that they have echo
cancellers as add-ons cards, it will be even lower.
I can't speak on hardware compatibility as i never tried a sangoma card.
(But i can say that in the last year i've never had an issue with digium
cards and we have 8 in use.) The
-Original Message-
From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium it'll be their own inability to
engineer reliable hardware.
I appreciate what Digium
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium it'll be their own inability to
engineer reliable hardware.
I appreciate what Digium has done for Asterisk, but reliability expectations
for phone
Eric Bishop wrote:
True. I think Digium's USA bias is clearly demonstrated by their lack
of a BRI ISDN product. Most of the rest of the world use it in
abudnace yet Digium do not see fit to service this market because it
is not big in the US. very poor...
And your EU bias is clearly
Brian Capouch wrote:
I'll be glad to stand corrected, but if that assertion is in fact
true, we should be careful to do things that actually damage Digium's
ability to leverage their development of Asterisk with their hardware
sales.
It sucks that its such a fine line. On the one had, it is
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
Brian Capouch wrote:
I'll be glad to stand corrected, but if that assertion is in fact
true, we should be careful to do things
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Eric Bishop wrote:
True. I think Digium's USA bias is clearly demonstrated by their lack
of a BRI ISDN product. Most of the rest of the world use it in
abudnace yet Digium do not see fit to service this market because it
is not big in the
On March 31, 2005 10:17 am, Rich Adamson wrote:
I'll second that one for sure. Maybe someone can talk Sangoma into
developing a competing TDM04b card? ;)
Actually I've found the TDM4XXP very good lately -- FXS and FXO.
-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing
I didnt have to do a single restart in about 2 million calls on te4xpp
so far.
David Brodbeck wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the
Steve Underwood wrote:
And your EU bias is clearly demonstrated by this. I've never seen a
BRI product outside he EU. :-)
Come to Houston, TX. We were running a BRI for quite some time before
upgrading to a T1.
-Matthew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing
I think the telecom market is so huge that it can easily support several
hardware suppliers - and all of them can be successful if they make a
good product. It can be good for Digium (and ultimately for us) that
Sangoma is providing some competition, as it will drive Digium to new
levels of
On Mar 31, 2005, at 8:01 AM, Zoa wrote:
cpu load on te4xxp cards is very low, and now that they have echo
cancellers as add-ons cards, it will be even lower.
I can't speak on hardware compatibility as i never tried a sangoma
card.
(But i can say that in the last year i've never had an issue with
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sangoma VS. Digium
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Eric Bishop wrote:
True. I think Digium's USA bias is clearly demonstrated by their lack
of a BRI ISDN product. Most of the rest of the world use it in
abudnace yet Digium do not see fit
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:00:12 -0500, David Brodbeck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium
-Original Message-
From: Zoa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didnt have to do a single restart in about 2 million calls on te4xpp
so far.
I'm happy for you. But my TDM04B will stop responding after about two
weeks, even if there are zero calls during that time. I found that out when
I
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 02:43 -0500, Brian Capouch wrote:
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma we're putting
the dagger to Digium.
Come on! If Digium started manufacturing tires, would i need to put 'em
on my car to keep on the favorable side of karma? Digium makes
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 10:00 -0500, David Brodbeck wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Capouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium it'll be their own
Remco Barende wrote:
It would be nice if Digium would accept the bristuff patch at some
stage and include it in asterisk.
GPL code cannot go into the Asterisk distribution.
Regards,
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
My understanding is that to an extent when we buy Sangoma
we're putting the dagger to Digium.
If anything puts the dagger to Digium it'll be their own inability to
engineer reliable hardware.
I appreciate what Digium has done for Asterisk, but reliability expectations
for phone
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
