On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:51 AM, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk
wrote:
On Wednesday 24 Jun 2015, Ivan Demkovitch wrote:
Hello team!
I’m planning to add fax functionality to my PBX. From research it seems
that there is 2 options: spandsp and Digium. I lean towards Digium app,
On Wednesday 24 Jun 2015, Ivan Demkovitch wrote:
Hello team!
I’m planning to add fax functionality to my PBX. From research it seems
that there is 2 options: spandsp and Digium. I lean towards Digium app,
licensing is fine. However, they don’t have download for v13 Should I just
download
On Thursday 21 Apr 2011, Khaled W. Chehab wrote:
Dears,
I configured an account on my asterisk pbx to record the outgoing calls.
When the asterisk pbx user make a call and send a fax the call recorded to
wave file format.
I searched the internet and found a software that can play the
On 21 Apr 2011, at 13:46, A J Stiles wrote:
You *might* be able to recover the document, *if and only if* the recording
quality is high enough. Easiest way to try it is to call up a fax machine
(either an actual real one, or a copy of Hylafax) from Asterisk and play the
wav file down
On 04/21/2011 08:12 PM, Khaled W. Chehab wrote:
Dears,
I configured an account on my asterisk pbx to record the outgoing calls.
When the asterisk pbx user make a call and send a fax the call
recorded to wave file format.
I searched the internet and found a software that can play the
On 11/13/2010 4:36 AM, Jeremy Kister wrote:
When a caller connects, asterisk switches to the fax context and hangs
up the call.
I was wrong, asterisk does not even switch to the fax extension-
i added a noop, and it's not making it:
exten = fax,1,NoOp( in fax extension )
exten =
This does sound like something that should stay on Asterisk-users.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Jeremy Kister asterisk...@jeremykister.com
wrote:
I upgraded from a perfectly working 1.6.2 asterisk installation
(including fax via app_fax_digium) to 1.8.0 this evening.
So you made sure to
Hi!
Is it possible to decouple the internal Fax communication from ISDN
using t38modem or as an alternative Fax For Asterisk, perhaps in
conjunction with HylaFAX?
Look at HylaFax first, and I guess that you will be happier with leaving
T.38 out of the picture.
Do note that hardware can
On 02/18/2010 03:40 PM, dle...@lstelcom.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to fix a Asterisk setup with buggy (POTS) Fax machines. The
setup consists of the following components:
- A Digium TE121 for connectiong to E1 ISDN
- Debian box with Asterisk 1.4
- Grandstream GXW-4008 SIP ATA to which the
Dialing DAHDI/21 will open DAHDI/21 as a line expecting further DTMF to dial
You need DAHDI/21/1234567
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Peter
Gelencser
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 10:11
Steve Underwood wrote:
Something is wrong if Asterisk is sending:
a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval
a=T38FaxTranscodingMMR
a=T38FaxTranscodingJBIG
Spandsp supports T38FaxFillBitRemoval, but neither spandsp or Commetrex
support the other two options. The Commetrex guys have said so in the FoIP
Cyprus VoIP wrote:
We're trying to receive faxes on the Asterisk server, but for the time
being T.38 negotiation fails.
The SDP that the Asterisk reINVITE sends contains these lines:
--
m=image 4968 udptl t38
a=T38FaxVersion:0
a=T38MaxBitRate:9600
We're trying to receive faxes on the Asterisk server, but for the time
being T.38 negotiation fails.
The SDP that the Asterisk reINVITE sends contains these lines:
--
m=image 4968 udptl t38
a=T38FaxVersion:0
a=T38MaxBitRate:9600
a=T38FaxFillBitRemoval
Cyprus VoIP wrote:
Before posting my question, I analyzed the entire SIP negotiation and it
was fine. The problem began in the T.38 negotiation itself, after the
Asterisk's reINVITE. I don't have the old calls traces anymore, but I'll
make new ones tomorrow and post them here.
The T.38
On 12/11/2009 03:33 AM, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
Cyprus VoIP wrote:
Before posting my question, I analyzed the entire SIP negotiation and it
was fine. The problem began in the T.38 negotiation itself, after the
Asterisk's reINVITE. I don't have the old calls traces anymore, but I'll
make
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Khaled W. Chehab kche...@xplorium.com wrote:
Dears I installed digium fax and followed the instruction at
http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/fax/README,And as you can see
above that t38 is loaded
Step 1: This is an asterisk-users question.
Step 2: This
Hi VoIPCrazy,
why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or similar?
Giorgio Incantalupo
voip crazy wrote:
Dear list,
I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one
I want to receibe the fax via mail and send faxes via web interface and a
digital send and receibe fax list.
Voipcrazy
2008/2/13, Giorgio Incantalupo [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi VoIPCrazy,
why don't you use an ATA device such as Grandstream 486 or similar?
Giorgio Incantalupo
voip crazy wrote:
I'm at this moment implementing the same as you do...
Take a look at the following links:
http://blog.evaristesys.com/?p=24
http://blogtech.oc9.com/index.php?option=com_contentview=articlecatid=4:asteriskid=77:20071121astItemid=6
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+fax
Regards,
Ricardo
I would recommend you use Iaxmodem / Hylafax / Avantfax for your needs.
We use this with several customers and it works very well. This way you
do not have to patch Asterisk with spanDSP. You can set up as many
virtual fax machines as your machine will handle.
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at
I need to setup asterisk to send and receibe fax. I just looking about
SpanDSP, Hylafax/Iaxmodem, AsterFax,...etc.
The asterisk box has Digium hardware, one TE420B and one TDM2402 (8 FXO
ports).
We use (at multiple sites, mostly BRI) iaxmodem and hylafax. Extra
bonus: you get all the cool
Hello,
2008/1/1, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Rob,
Rob Hillis wrote:
Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232
modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact
that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.)
Steve
On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The most recent versions of t38modem can apparently provide both a SIP
and H.323 T.38 to class 1 FAX modem interface for HylaFAX. What it
cannot provide is an audio FAX interface. The sipmodem code I am
working
on will integrate audio
Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232
modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact
that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.)
Steve Underwood wrote:
Rob Hillis wrote:
Last time I heard IAXModem didn't support T.38
Hi Rob,
Rob Hillis wrote:
Well that answers that question. I see that t38modem provides an H232
modem - is this unsuitable for HylaFAX's purpose? (ignoring the fact
that it requires a kernel recompile on most newer distros.)
Steve Underwood wrote:
Rob Hillis wrote:
Last time I heard
I'm not looking at T.38 , at this time its terminating a SIP trunk with
multiple DID's for fax.
I'm using this configuration with linksys PAP ATA and satisfied with
results.
I'm looking at removing these ATA 's and using Asterisk ( or giving it a try
) for terminating fax.
Last time I heard
Then I suggest you prepare yourself for a lot of pain. Fax over the
'net without T.38 is almost guaranteed to not work.
Al lists wrote:
I'm not looking at T.38 , at this time its terminating a SIP trunk
with multiple DID's for fax.
I'm using this configuration with linksys PAP ATA and
up connection.
Jonn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:51 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Then I suggest you prepare
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive over
400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP provider. And this
connection is used for ALL office traffic, mail, VPN, webmail, and DNS. NO
echo and no voice quality issues. Now we
Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive over
400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP provider. And this
connection is used for ALL office
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
I have it setup to email me any failed fax connections. Most of the faxes
come from remote offices, distributors and customers.
Same here, but HylaFAX won't send you any logs of attempts that haven't
at least negotiated a fax transmission. Call comes in, tries to
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 13:48 -0600, Jonn R Taylor wrote:
REALY?? Humm I have been doing this for over a year and we receive
over 400 faxes a month! 8 iaxmodems with DID's from a real SIP
provider. And this connection is used for ALL office traffic, mail,
VPN, webmail, and DNS. NO echo and
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
I have it setup to email me any failed fax connections. Most of the faxes
come from remote offices, distributors and customers.
Same here, but HylaFAX won't send you any logs of attempts
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
If I had ANY failed faxes I would here about it. Iaxmodem creates a log of
its own, so when I get a connection that fails hylafax sends the failure to
me. One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the
iaxmodem config file,
Really? I'll have
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the
iaxmodem config file
The reason that you need the nojitterbuffer in the iaxmodem config file
is because you're actually getting at least some jitter.
IAXmodem's jitterbuffer simply fills-in gaps due
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Lytle
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 3:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
If I had ANY failed faxes I would here about it. Iaxmodem creates
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
One of the things that I found is you need to add nojitterbuffer to the
iaxmodem config file
The reason that you need the nojitterbuffer in the iaxmodem config file
is because
I'd say consider yourself very lucky. I know I did some testing here
some time ago with faxing over VoIP.
* One extension to another over G711a with both extensions on the
same LAN - worked 95% of the time
* One extension on my Asterisk server to an Extension on a friend's
NOT true and I have proven that for the last year.
Jonn
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hillis
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:13 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
I'd
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
FYI... I love this.
Ben Franklin quote:
I truly believe it. But, it being a Franklin quote is in some dispute.
I like it all the same.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
I have always said that if some one said it can't be done, they did not try
hard enough.
FYI... I love this.
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
As the person
Guys!
what i was looking here was a simple hint/recommendation for installing
IaxModem and Hylafax.
Let me try it myself and see how feasible this solutions is.
On Jan 1, 2008 5:02 PM, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
I have always said that if some one said it
and I know how to
make networks work the way they need to.
Jonn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Underwood
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 6:02 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Rob Hillis
*Sent:* Tuesday, January 01, 2008 4:13 PM
*To:* Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
I'd say consider yourself very
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Al lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what method is preferred:
haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing.
What are you trying to do and do you have a T1 or ISDN line?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
at this time is terminating a SIP trunk,
each DID will get its own fax box.
I guess at this time i'm looking to find a tutorial for installing iaxmodem
and hylafax as it seems to be the answer.
On Dec 31, 2007 9:11 PM, Andrew Joakimsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Al lists
Unless your provider provides a T.38 gateway, fax over SIP is pretty
much guaranteed to be unusable. Often you can get away with it over a
LAN using G711a or G711u, but any of the lower bandwidth codecs /won't/
be able to properly handle fax calls.
Whilst I haven't used it myself, I believe
If by fax box you mean an ATA with a fax machine attached them
Asterisk 1.4 with T38 passthrough should work if the SIP provider has
T.38 capabilites.
If by fax box you mean a 'faxmail inbox' then no Asterisk cannot
help you terminate that from SIP. Get a Cisco gateway, make sure your
provider
Rob Hillis wrote:
Last time I heard IAXModem didn't support T.38 because the IAX2
protocol didn't support T.38 - whether that's still the case or not, I
don't know.
There are actually two reasons. One is that T.38 over IAX is not
defined. The other is the current T.38 termination support in
Al lists wrote:
So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ?
any reason?
HylaFAX+ has built-in support for handling transmission errors. It used
to be (Not sure now) that when rx/txfax encountered an error, it just
quit. HylaFAX+ also has many features available for
Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ?
On Dec 29, 2007 6:49 AM, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al lists wrote:
So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ?
any reason?
HylaFAX+ has built-in support for handling transmission errors. It used
to
Of Al lists
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 9:44 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ?
On Dec 29, 2007 6:49 AM, Doug Lytle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al lists wrote
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Al lists wrote:
Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and hylafax+ ?
Just a note: the interface of iaxmodem to Asterisk hasn't changed since
1.2 . Chances are older documentation will be relevant.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755
thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which one is
more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres?
On Dec 29, 2007 12:10 PM, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:43:30AM -0700, Al lists wrote:
Any recommended how to for 1.4 iaxmodem and
Al lists wrote:
thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which
one is more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres?
I believe I answered that question. HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem.
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a
- Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.4 Fax
Al lists wrote:
thank you all, still i'm seeking answer to original question, which
one is more preferred in fax servers with 100 usres?
I believe I answered that question. HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem.
Doug
--
Ben
Al lists wrote:
what method is preferred:
haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing.
I think that you mean to say HylaFAX and IAXmodem or txfax/rxfax ...
because spandsp is but a DSP/DCE library, and it cannot work alone, and
iaxmodem uses spandsp.
Thanks,
Lee.
Al lists wrote:
what method is preferred:
haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing.
HylaFAX+ and iaxmodem (That includes SpanDSP).
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
So HylaFax and IaxModem is more preferred than using rxfax/txfax ?
any reason?
On Dec 28, 2007 6:40 PM, Lee Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Al lists wrote:
what method is preferred:
haylafax and Iaxmodem or spnadsp for faxing.
I think that you mean to say HylaFAX and IAXmodem or
Hi Marco,
could you try again with different quality settings on your hardware fax?
I see 1728 x 540 in your spandsp log.
I think spandsp is only compatible with :
standard: width=1728 x length=1128
fine: width=1728 x length=2252
super-fine: width=1728 x length=4491
which are the 3 resolution you
On 9/27/07, Jonn R Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
marco britannio wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup an asterisk based fax receiving machine.
i'm using asterisk 1.2.18 and app_rxfax with spandsp 0.0.4pre9
I have no problems with a modem-fax, but with the fax machines i have
tried
marco britannio wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup an asterisk based fax receiving machine.
i'm using asterisk 1.2.18 and app_rxfax with spandsp 0.0.4pre9
I have no problems with a modem-fax, but with the fax machines i have
tried almost every fax fails, both in sending and receive.
the
Jonn R Taylor wrote:
marco britannio wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup an asterisk based fax receiving machine.
i'm using asterisk 1.2.18 and app_rxfax with spandsp 0.0.4pre9
I have no problems with a modem-fax, but with the fax machines i have
tried almost every fax fails, both in sending
Hi!
Either the fax machine or the asterisk box has to pick up the call to
know whether it is a fax or not.
My solution is that I let asterisk pick up every call, and if it is a
fax, then the call is forwarded to a fax-machine.
If its a voice call, the call is forwarded to the phones.
Hi,
Thank you very much. I will test your method
ASLAY
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Artner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk
]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] asterisk and fax machine
Hi!
Either the fax machine or the asterisk box has to pick up the call to
know whether it is a fax or not.
My solution
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 12:49 +0200, Thomas Artner wrote:
My solution is that I let asterisk pick up every call, and if it is a
fax, then the call is forwarded to a fax-machine.
If its a voice call, the call is forwarded to the phones.
That is what I do as well. Use the fax extension to forward
For an all electronic solution, use fax2mail and mail2fax (from
www.generationd.com). For a fancier all VOIP solution consider hylafax.
For analog only you can plug your fax machine in as you suggest. For a step
up, buy an ATA with T.38 capability and plug your fax machine into that.
MD
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:34:19PM +, --[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement for sending and receiving faxes and was
wondering the best way to achieve it with Asterisk as I only have one
phone line.
I currently have a TDM11B in my server (1 x FXO, 1 x FXS), so I was
I would just put the phone line into the fax machine and the phone jack
from it into the fxs card. It is a simple solution.
Bob
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement for sending and receiving faxes and was wondering the best
way to achieve it with Asterisk as I only have one phone
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement for sending and receiving faxes and was wondering the best
way to achieve it with Asterisk as I only have one phone line.
I currently have a TDM11B in my server (1 x FXO, 1 x FXS), so I was thinking
that I would need to get a additional FXS
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:59:25 -0500
Robert A. Rawlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just put the phone line into the fax machine and the phone jack
from it into the fxs card. It is a simple solution.
Bob
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Hi,
I have a requirement for sending and receiving
No. Asterisk does not have fax support and there are no plans to add it.
You can however send the faxes as voice calls, however there is no
assurance as to its reliability. Maybe most will work but some will
without a doubt be predestine to fail.
On 3/2/07, --[ UxBoD ]-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noc Phibee wrote:
Hi
i have a asterisk server with a Digium 4xE1 card connected to my local
operator.
I am search a How to for :
- Add a Mail to Fax server
- Add a Fax to Mail Server
http://iaxmode.sourceforge.net
http://hylafax.sourceforge.net
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Noc Phibee wrote:
I am search a How to for :
- Add a Mail to Fax server
- Add a Fax to Mail Server
Oooops, that should have been http://iaxmodem.sourceforge.net
Doug
--
Ben Franklin quote:
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety,
Check out www.generationd.com for a couple of useful scripts (fax2mail and
mail2fax). If I interpret your question properly, you looking for scripts.
If in fact you are looking for sendmail/libtiff help, have a search through
the archives.
MD
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get a regular POTS line and put a 50.00 fax on it.
There are too many variables,
1. Does your provider really give you a clean g.711 connection or are they
routing you from a VoIP based Trunk.
2. The internet may not provide the bandwidth or the relability you need
to have a fax
Just a quick note, make sure /var/spool/asterisk-fax/ exists and is
writable by whatever asterisk runs as. Assuming your connection is
good enough, I had LINE ERRORs because app_rxfax aborted right after
the handshake as it would not write the output file. I think there is
a debug mode in
ubject: Re:
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk to Fax ServerWhat Fax server
are you using?
On 11/21/05, Arcady
Litmanovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for following
solution:
Asterisk is connected to PSTN by Digium
or some another card which has Fax
What Fax server are you using?
On 11/21/05, Arcady Litmanovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for following solution:
Asterisk is connected to PSTN by Digium or some another card which has Fax Detection
If incoming call is a fax I woud like to transfer it to External Fax server by SIP
On May 18, 2005 08:04 am, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
You can get the info and stamp it into the image yourself with some
third
party TIFF manipulation tools, I bet.
I wouldn't mind doing so if I knew where this Fax ID information is
stored or how to retrieve it, or if it's even possible.
HelloOn 20/05/2005, at 6:41 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:That would be the ${REMOTESTATIONID} extension variable. RxFax sets it, among other variables, upon fax reception completion. "Show Application RxFax" for more information. Great.. Exactly what I was looking for... Thank you for
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
The header is always in the received image. The TIFF file contains
exactly the same image that a receiving FAX machine would print out.
I think he is refering to the remote fax id to be presented, not the
header. I.e. the 20 digit user selectable
HelloOn 18/05/2005, at 4:09 PM, Peter Svensson wrote:I think he is refering to the remote fax id to be presented, not the header. I.e. the 20 digit user selectable number on the remote fax. The one often seen on the lcd of the receiving fax and so on. Yes that's exactly what I'm referring
On May 18, 2005 07:22 am, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Yes that's exactly what I'm referring to.
Most fax machines I've used print this information on the top left
corner or top right corner on any fax received.
Is it possible to do this with SpanDSP?
You can get the info and stamp it into the
HiOn 18/05/2005, at 9:35 PM, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:You can get the info and stamp it into the image yourself with some third party TIFF manipulation tools, I bet. I wouldn't mind doing so if I knew where this Fax ID information is stored or how to retrieve it, or if it's even possible.JY ---
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello
On 18/05/2005, at 4:09 PM, Peter Svensson wrote:
I think he is refering to the remote fax id to be presented, not the
header. I.e. the 20 digit user selectable number on the remote fax. The
one often seen on the lcd of the receiving fax and so on.
Yes that's
Hi PeterOn 18/05/2005, at 10:05 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:It is only there because the sending machine put it there in the image. Spandsp is not different from how any FAX machine I have ever used behaves. As well as sending the 20 digit number as text, the sending machine puts in the header. This
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hi Peter
On 18/05/2005, at 10:05 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
It is only there because the sending machine put it there in the
image. Spandsp is not different from how any FAX machine I have ever
used behaves. As well as sending the 20 digit number as text, the
sending
HiOn 19/05/2005, at 1:41 AM, Steve Underwood wrote:So you get the calling machine's number shown twice at the top of each page? Once in this extra header, and once in the normal header sent as part of the image? Weird. FAX machines don't normally do that. Does this extra header overlay a part of
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
On my Brother's fax machine (MFC-8820D) today, I've received 3 faxes:
all of them at the top showed the caller Fax identity.
I received 2 faxes on Asterisk with spandsp, one from the same sender
as earlier on the
Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
Hello Steve.
On 17/05/2005, at 10:54 PM, Steve Underwood wrote:
When a fax is received the header you see is part of the image. As
such, it ends up in the TIFF file as part of the image. It is not
available as text anywhere. The only way to make it available as text
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Peer Oliver
schmidt
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 9:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk and fax over ip - concept
Would the following be a doable solution:
1. An Asterisk-box on site with FXS
2
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:28:02PM +0100, Dawid Mielnik wrote:
Would the t.38 transmission be properly handled by the t.38 supporting end
points whith mediastrem passing through Asterisk ? (dont have much
experience with t.38) Has anyone ever tried anything similar / different /
wierder to
Hi!
What I would do i this situation is work out a fax -- email gateway.
Best case this could be done entirely with software on the asterisk
box, worst case a faxmodem hairpinned into an fxs card using hylafax.
Why exactly would hylafax be a worst case solution only, why would you
tink that
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:31:30PM +0100, Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
Why exactly would hylafax be a worst case solution only, why would you
tink that that the Asterisk solution is better at all?
The worst case would be the modem hairpinned into an FXS
port, not hylafax per se.
Instead
Would the following be a doable solution:
1. An Asterisk-box on site with FXS
2. Plug Fax into FXS
3. User uses facsimile machine to call a number - Asterisk answers
4. Stores called number into variable ${FAXDESTINATION}
5. Use RcfFax of * to store fax within asterisk
6. mail stored fax together
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:51:51PM -0500, William Waites said:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 09:31:30PM +0100, Philipp von Klitzing wrote:
Why exactly would hylafax be a worst case solution only, why would you
tink that that the Asterisk solution is better at all?
The worst case would be the
Hi,
-Original Message-
What I would do i this situation is work out a fax --
email gateway.
Best case this could be done entirely with software on the asterisk
box, worst case a faxmodem hairpinned into an fxs card
using hylafax.
Why exactly would hylafax be a worst case
99 matches
Mail list logo
