Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
Thanks again Russ, I did as you described: [ 1777.393179] dahdi: Version: 2.7.0.1 [ 1777.393995] dahdi: Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 [ 1789.943167] dahdi: Warning: Span DAHDI_DUMMY/1 didn't specify a spantype. Please fix driver! [ 1789.943865] dahdi_dummy: Trying to load High

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: --- Results after 72 passes --- Best: 99.401% -- Worst: 69.357% -- Average: 90.260025% Cummulative Accuracy (not per pass): 92.402 I suspect it may not be good enough yet for production but a step in the right direction :-)

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
Hi Russ, I rebooted the machine loading dahdi_dummy in /etc/modules before the /etc/init.d/dahdi. Now dahdi_test shows a nearly perfect score: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 99.998% 99.990% 99.998% 99.996% 99.998% 99.998% 99.997% 99.997% 99.998% 99.997%

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
Hi Russ, Sorry I didn't send that... Here's a few runs: # cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc sleep 1 cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc 28:1682906 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC-fasteoi

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Gareth Blades
On 15/05/14 16:28, Mike Leddy wrote: Hi Russ, I rebooted the machine loading dahdi_dummy in /etc/modules before the /etc/init.d/dahdi. Now dahdi_test shows a nearly perfect score: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 99.998% 99.990% 99.998% 99.996% 99.998% 99.998%

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Mike Leddy
Thanks for the suggestion Gareth, The span line I'm using is: span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 Its the same as used with the TE12xP that is normally used on this E1 line in production which is extremely stable. I did as you suggested using: span=1,0,0,ccs,hdb3,crc4 After a dahdi_cfg pretty much the

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:28:44PM -0300, Mike Leddy wrote: Hi Russ, I rebooted the machine loading dahdi_dummy in /etc/modules before the /etc/init.d/dahdi. Unless you're using a relatively old version of dahdi, there's no separate module called dahdi_dummy. It is an alias to the main dahdi

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Mike Leddy
I remembered I have an older box with a Wildcard TE12xP that uses the wcte12xp module with a newer 3.9.11 kernel that works perfectly. I setup the problematic machine with the same kernel in the hope that this might be relevant. Unfortunately the same situation persists. I used the

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Eric Wieling
...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mike Leddy Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 3:43 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results I remembered I have an older box with a Wildcard TE12xP that uses the wcte12xp module

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Mike Leddy
:43 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results I remembered I have an older box with a Wildcard TE12xP that uses the wcte12xp module with a newer 3.9.11 kernel that works perfectly. I setup the problematic machine with the same kernel

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-14 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: Hi Eric, I plugged an E1 into the card and it doesn't make any difference. Check to see if the card is interrupting 1000 times per second with something like: cat /proc/interrupts | grep wc sleep 1 cat /proc/interrupts |

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Leddy
Thanks Russ, I blacklisted wcopenpci, and i noticed an improvement: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo dahdi interface, measuring accuracy... 91.973% 96.242% 94.423% 77.932% 97.654% 87.114% 68.750% 87.417% 75.768% 95.693% 93.086% 77.936% 87.283% 92.996% 77.942% 77.926% 77.943% 89.545% 93.949% 87.032%

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-13 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: But on examination the /etc/init.d/dahdi start was only loading the dahdi module. With this in mind I might start looking around the system for things which might cause jitter in the servicing of system timer interrupts: Are

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-13 Thread Mike Leddy
Thanks again Russ, Just a quick reply for now. No virtualization, but yes I am running a tickless kernel: # # Processor type and features # CONFIG_NO_HZ=y Standard for debian kernels. I booted with nohz=off and the behaviour changed. Unfortunately for the worse: # dahdi_test Opened pseudo

Re: [asterisk-users] Terrible dahdi_test results

2014-05-12 Thread Russ Meyerriecks
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Mike Leddy m...@loop.com.br wrote: [ 39.223031] wcopenpci: Module loaded [ 39.751770] wcte1xxp: Setting yellow alarm # dahdi_hardware pci::06:00.0 wcte11xp+e159:0001 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Board Mike, This stuff predates my time on