Re: [asterisk-users] Pass DTMF to IVR gateway through SIP phone conferencing.

2010-12-21 Thread Asterisk Man
Christian, Thanks for your response. In my case, I was asked to do it through SIP phone 3 way call functionality and not the Asterisk Meetme application. I wanted to know if any one had done something similar in past or not. I am short of PRI in my test environment and hence I can't test it

[asterisk-users] SOLVED: Re: Setting `userfield` from within a callfile

2010-12-21 Thread A J Stiles
On Monday 20 Dec 2010, Olivier wrote: 2010/12/20 A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk Our current Asterisk 1.6.2.9 setup includes a CGI auto-dial application (written by someone else before me) which sets up calls by creating files of the general form Channel: SIP/$INSIDE_NUMBER

[asterisk-users] app_voicemail.c how to enable debugging?

2010-12-21 Thread Benoit Panizzon
Hi Looking at the source of app_voicemail.c there are many statements like: ast_debug(1, %s doesn't exist, doing what we can\n, prefile); Where do I have to enably this to be showed in the console or logged to a file by logger. core set debug does not seem to help

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Thorsten Göllner
Am 20.12.2010 21:39, schrieb Ernie Dunbar: We have an issue with our Asterisk install where Asterisk produces many Zombie processes (on the order of several hundred per minute) until either the Asterisk server is restarted (and the zombies die a natural death), or the kernel runs out of PID

Re: [asterisk-users] app_voicemail.c how to enable debugging?

2010-12-21 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:47:02AM +0100, Benoit Panizzon wrote: [snip] Well, my actual problem is, that if a customer has recorded his own greeting, he usualy tells the caller to record his message after the tone, so app_voicemail should not play the intro. spool/mailbox/unavail.gsm

[asterisk-users] MeetMe - ConfBridge: hint not working

2010-12-21 Thread sean darcy
I'm trying to migrate from MeetMe to ConfBridge: [conferences] exten=_8[1-9],1,Answer() ;;exten=_8[1-9],1,Meetme(${EXTEN},1Ms,1234) exten=_8[1-9],2,ConfBridge(${EXTEN},1Ms) exten=_8[1-9],n,Hangup And that works. Also changed the hints: ;;exten = 81,hint,MeetMe:81 exten =

[asterisk-users] Friend/user/peer in plain English?

2010-12-21 Thread Gilles
Hello I've done some googling, but still puzzled at my working configuration. Apparently, a user can only receive calls through Asterisk, a peer can only make calls, and a friend can do both. If that's correct, I don't understand why my VOSP requires the following settings in sip.conf

Re: [asterisk-users] Call sip:u...@domain.com?

2010-12-21 Thread Gilles
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:39:44 -0600, Kevin P. Fleming kpflem...@digium.com wrote: You've missed a very important point here: you are using a *SIP* endpoint to call a *SIP* URI. The endpoint can do that directly, and doesn't need any help from Asterisk to do it. If you wanted to be able to

Re: [asterisk-users] SIP 420

2010-12-21 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
On 12/20/2010 07:08 PM, Dovey Forman wrote: Thanks Kevin. Did it work with Asterisk 1.2 because it ignored it? I don't know specifically that Asterisk 1.2 ignored Required headers, but it's certainly possible. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies 445 Jan

Re: [asterisk-users] Call sip:u...@domain.com?

2010-12-21 Thread A J Stiles
On Tuesday 21 Dec 2010, Gilles wrote: But I could use a good article/book to better understand my options, how Asterisk is different from the alternatives (Freeswitch, openSIPS, etc.) www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooksfield-keyword s=voip The same way Ubuntu,

Re: [asterisk-users] Call sip:u...@domain.com?

2010-12-21 Thread Steve Howes
On 21 Dec 2010, at 14:20, A J Stiles wrote: Well, every Free and Open Source telephony system is using Asterisk (and Linux) under the bonnet. The differences are in the user configuration tools. Uh, no? S -- _ --

Re: [asterisk-users] Call sip:u...@domain.com?

2010-12-21 Thread Gilles
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:20:55 +, A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk wrote: The same way Ubuntu, Slackware, CentOS c. differ from each other. They are all using the Linux kernel and the X Window System under the bonnet. Well, every Free and Open Source telephony system is using

Re: [asterisk-users] MeetMe - ConfBridge: hint not working

2010-12-21 Thread Jeremy Betts
What version are you running? I believe device state tracking for ConfBridge was recently added. On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:39 AM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to migrate from MeetMe to ConfBridge: [conferences] exten=_8[1-9],1,Answer()

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Ernie Dunbar
Am 20.12.2010 21:39, schrieb Ernie Dunbar: We have an issue with our Asterisk install where Asterisk produces many Zombie processes (on the order of several hundred per minute) until either the Asterisk server is restarted (and the zombies die a natural death), or the kernel runs out of

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Vinícius Fontes
Your server is being brute-forced. Read this article (http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Fail2Ban+(with+iptables)+And+Asterisk) and set up fail2ban on your machine right now.Atenciosamente,Vinícius FontesGerente de Segurança da InformaçãoCanall Tecnologia em ComunicaçõesPasso Fundo - RS -

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Andrew Latham
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ernie Dunbar maill...@lightspeed.ca wrote: We have an issue with our Asterisk install where Asterisk produces many Zombie processes (on the order of several hundred per minute) until either the Asterisk server is restarted (and the zombies die a natural death),

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Ernie Dunbar
Actually, no. This is part of a migration, and those are mostly customers' secondary lines (which for the most part, aren't even active). We get a lot of these bad logins because the retry times on the ATAs are quite short. Asterisk really *shouldn't* leave zombies around for every bad login, but

[asterisk-users] What is equivalent function to mv command in php for Asterisk Spool directory usage?

2010-12-21 Thread Bruce B
Hi Everyone, I understand that there are a few warnings about using cp to move .call files to /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing as they might acted upon before copy is done. So, using PHP, What is the equivalent of mv command? Would it be rename() in php or is there a better method? Thanks, --

Re: [asterisk-users] What is equivalent function to mv command in php for Asterisk Spool directory usage?

2010-12-21 Thread Danny Nicholas
PERL has a move() command; I wouldn't expect less out of PHP. _ From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bruce B Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 2:20 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

Re: [asterisk-users] What is equivalent function to mv command in php for Asterisk Spool directory usage?

2010-12-21 Thread MrHanMan
I think rename() is what you're looking for http://php.net/manual/en/function.rename.php On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: PERL has a move() command; I wouldn’t expect less out of PHP. From:

Re: [asterisk-users] What is equivalent function to mv command in php for Asterisk Spool directory usage?

2010-12-21 Thread Zeeshan Zakaria
I have been using: exec ('mv *.call /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing') and for a long time it has been working just fine for me on more than one websites. Just make sure the folder where you create the call files has correct permissions and ownerships so that the file is successfully moved by the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.8 - Dial problem if SIP friend is UNREACHABLE.

2010-12-21 Thread Jarek Jarzebowski
2010/12/21 Paul Belanger pabelan...@digium.com: On 10-12-20 05:51 PM, Jarek Jarzebowski wrote: OK, so I have attached debug log. I am using: *CLI core show version Asterisk 1.8.1.1 built by root @ asterisk on a i686 running Linux on 2010-12-17 23:03:58 UTC Definitely a bug, ran into the

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Monday 20 December 2010 14:39:36 Ernie Dunbar wrote: We have an issue with our Asterisk install where Asterisk produces many Zombie processes (on the order of several hundred per minute) until either the Asterisk server is restarted (and the zombies die a natural death), or the kernel runs

Re: [asterisk-users] SOLVED: Re: Setting `userfield` from within a callfile

2010-12-21 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Tuesday 21 December 2010 04:49:42 A J Stiles wrote: On Monday 20 Dec 2010, Olivier wrote: 2010/12/20 A J Stiles asterisk_l...@earthshod.co.uk Our current Asterisk 1.6.2.9 setup includes a CGI auto-dial application (written by someone else before me) which sets up calls by

[asterisk-users] Simplifying dial-plan

2010-12-21 Thread Stephen Reese
Is there a way to include: _NXXNXX _NXX _011. _911 into my current plan: -- _ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:

Re: [asterisk-users] Simplifying dial-plan

2010-12-21 Thread Stephen Reese
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Stephen Reese rsre...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a way to include: _NXXNXX _NXX _011. _911 into my current plan: Sorry, here's the rest. exten = _1NXXNXX,1,Set(Outgoing=${CUT(CHANNEL,/,2)}) exten =

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk 1.6 produces *many* zombie processes on Debian.

2010-12-21 Thread Ernie Dunbar
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ernie Dunbar maill...@lightspeed.ca wrote: We have an issue with our Asterisk install where Asterisk produces many Zombie processes (on the order of several hundred per minute) until either the Asterisk server is restarted (and the zombies die a natural

[asterisk-users] Asterisk as a caller ID

2010-12-21 Thread Cary Fitch
In a 1.4.24 system, out of several lines, one of ours gets 1 or more random calls a day with Asterisk as the caller ID. I have just seen this described in the last couple of weeks, but at the time it wasn't happening to us, and I the explanation didn't stick with me. Can anyone give me a pointer

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk as a caller ID

2010-12-21 Thread Doug Lytle
Cary Fitch wrote: In a 1.4.24 system, out of several lines, one of ours gets 1 or more random calls a day with Asterisk as the caller ID. In my experience, it happens when the caller is blocking their CID. I have programming in place that assigns the named restricted and the phone number

Re: [asterisk-users] MeetMe - ConfBridge: hint not working

2010-12-21 Thread sean darcy
On 12/21/2010 12:13 PM, Jeremy Betts wrote: What version are you running? I believe device state tracking for ConfBridge was recently added. On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:39 AM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com mailto:seandar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to migrate from MeetMe to ConfBridge:

Re: [asterisk-users] MeetMe - ConfBridge: hint not working

2010-12-21 Thread sean darcy
On 12/21/2010 10:03 PM, sean darcy wrote: On 12/21/2010 12:13 PM, Jeremy Betts wrote: What version are you running? I believe device state tracking for ConfBridge was recently added. On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:39 AM, sean darcy seandar...@gmail.com mailto:seandar...@gmail.com wrote: I'm

Re: [asterisk-users] What is equivalent function to mv command in php for Asterisk Spool directory usage?

2010-12-21 Thread Steve Edwards
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Bruce B wrote: So, using PHP, What is the equivalent of mv command? Would it be rename() in php or is there a better method? Not really an Asterisk question... On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, MrHanMan wrote: I think rename() is what you're looking for +1 On Tue, 21 Dec 2010,

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-21 Thread Michael
Anyone?? Thanks. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:42 AM, VoIP Question voip.quest...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, We have a strange situation (asterisk 1.6.2.14), where we get a result for DIALSTATUS for BUSY and No-ANSWER, but nothing for CANCEL. This is the (relevant) test dialplan:

Re: [asterisk-users] PTMP BRI Unable to receive TEI from network in state 2(Assign awaiting TEI) - Asterisk 1.6.2, Latest DAHDI, LibPRI

2010-12-21 Thread Olivier
2010/12/18 Matt Riddell li...@venturevoip.com On 17/12/10 5:56 PM, Olivier wrote: Hi, Did you use libpri 1.4.11.5 or 1.4.12-beta ? Recently l tried 1.4.11.5 on a live system and it failed (Asterisk 1.6.1.18 and dahdi trunk, Junghanns QuadBRI, PtmP lines). Going back to 1.4.11.2 solved

Re: [asterisk-users] Simplifying dial-plan

2010-12-21 Thread Jeroen Eeuwes
Hi Stephen, _NXXNXX _NXX _011. _911 Of course it can, but it depends on what you want to do when those numbers are called... I didn't know about the setvar in the sip.conf and actually I think it is a much cleaner solution. Since you are already using it I would suggest to not only

Re: [asterisk-users] DIALSTATUS on CANCEL

2010-12-21 Thread Nikhil
Hi Enable debug level to more than 1 ,you may get something. Thanks Nikhil On 12/22/2010 11:26 AM, Michael wrote: Spawn extension (incoming-private, , 3) exited non-zero on 'SIP/Proxy-0031' -- _ -- Bandwidth