Re: [asterisk-users] USA Did required

2011-10-01 Thread Eric Wieling
In the USA ordering BRI service is discouraged by the telcos and is very uncommon. In Verizon NE CLECs are not even permitted to order BRIs. -Original Message- From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tamer Higazi Sent:

Re: [asterisk-users] [asterik-users] Installing PRI card

2011-10-01 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 05:15:32AM +0530, NaJIm wrote: *wcte12xp: Setting up global serial parameters for T1* *wcte12xp: Found a Wildcard TE122* *wcte12xp: Span configured for ESF/B8ZS* *wcte12xp: Setting yellow alarm* Does the highlighted part mean that the card is setup in T1 mode. ?? (

[asterisk-users] Converting dahdi_monitor unit to dbm0

2011-10-01 Thread Gustavo Santos
Hello, I need to convert the dahdi_monitor output to dBm0, so I can measure Echo Return Loss in dB. I've read a formula that calculate S(k) in ITU-T G.168 recommendation, where S(k) is the signal level in dBm0. Can I use this formula to convert it? If yes, what value should I use to the number of

Re: [asterisk-users] USA Did required

2011-10-01 Thread Tamer Higazi
I say only, that it is MONEYMAKING ISDN is the best thing ever. Using the internet completly through VoIP is wasting ressources and if the ISP connection falls for a time, the line communication fall either. I think if a state permits ordering isdn bri channels, then there is only a thought

[asterisk-users] Make asterisk cluster appear and operate as a single server?

2011-10-01 Thread Tobias Steen
Hi, I'm trying to plan a system of clustered asterisk machines where a number of SIP trunks will be hosted on the platform. Each trunk will be hosted for a specific customer who owns it and therefore payment is handled directly between the customers and their trunk-providers, each trunk will

Re: [asterisk-users] Make asterisk cluster appear and operate as a single server?

2011-10-01 Thread Michelle Dupuis
If one server is supposed to carry the full load of the other during failure, then you have to size each server to handle 100% load - so load balancing is pointless. Checkout haast at www.generationd.comhttp://www.generationd.com and read the docs on how it does failover...certainly good for