Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF Testing software to test IVR system

2011-12-29 Thread Sammy Govind
Easy, use Read() to capture the incoming DTMF from Server-B Server-A Server-B Initiate-Call - AnswerCall() SendDTMF(5)-- Read() Read()-SendDTMF(4) SendDTMF(3)-- Read()

Re: [asterisk-users] Function TESTTIME example [SOLVED]

2011-12-29 Thread Olivier
2011/12/29, Mindaugas Jasiulis mindaugas.jasiu...@mediafon.lt: AEL2 ifTime use it too. AEL2 ifTime become the same GoToIfTime in the dialplan :) I feel a bit shameful but I must say that it's now working on my system ! I don't understand why it didn't yesterday. Anyway, thank you very much for

Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF Testing software to test IVR system

2011-12-29 Thread virendra bhati
In server B if I use SendDTMF then it means I am changing programming at server B. Actually I don't have right or permission to change programming in server B. otherwise your suggestion is best for channel base communication. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Sammy Govind govoi...@gmail.com

Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting attack tonight fail2ban them

2011-12-29 Thread Mikhail Lischuk
Jeroen Eeuwes писал 29.12.2011 07:29: Probably my understanding is limited, but it seems to me that they have already 'access' to your Asterisk for them to be able to try to make outgoing calls. Wouldn't it be better to make sure they get the usual errors like Registration from failed -

Re: [asterisk-users] DTMF Testing software to test IVR system

2011-12-29 Thread Sammy Govind
o in that case you need to observer the call flow in Server-B, i.e what is the length of sound file playing. what DTMF it requires etc etc and once you detect the call flow for a successful IVR traversal then mimic the behaviour of the call from Server-A. Thats all you can do. Think of it exactly

[asterisk-users] Help_In Voicemail , vedio play but voice is not here out.

2011-12-29 Thread Durgesh Mishra
Hi all, I am using to Xlite to save video voice mail. when i retreive it, then only video show , no voice is here out. Plz tell me where ,i am wrong , and how i can able to see video plus here audio in voice mail box. I did following configuration In Sip.conf videosupport=yes

Re: [asterisk-users] Question on hung channel

2011-12-29 Thread Jerry Geis
On 12/28/2011 03:57 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I ran into a rare situation today. A really short message is being played over the ALSA or console channel from one asterisk box to another. Both running 1.4.30. the incoming context on the ALSA or Console port box first runs an AGI before connecting

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: I have been running 1.8.7 with a few fixes back ported from the 1.8.8 release candidate for the last 2.5 months. The system processes around 4,000 calls per day over PRIs for 250 Polycom phones. Previously I was running

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk fail2ban filters - show us yours

2011-12-29 Thread Diego Aguirre (DagMoller)
Hi, I Have added this line for asterisk 1.8 (i have allowguest=yes and context=default in sip.conf): NOTICE.* .*: Call from '.*' (HOST) to extension '.*' rejected because extension not found in context 'default'. Em 29-12-2011 13:03, Patrick Lists escreveu: Hi, In the thread Interesting

Re: [asterisk-users] IAX2 woes

2011-12-29 Thread Carlos Rojas
Hello Asterisk only says that the iax2 channel don't work maybe you look the iax.conf. you trunk. Is iax I think Regards On Dec 29, 2011 6:49 AM, --[ UxBoD ]-- ux...@splatnix.net wrote: Hello all, I attempted to make a couple of outbound calls this morning and always got the busy tone. I

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Bruce B
Log are being filled with g729 transcoding error in 1.8.7x now :-( I don't dare to test 1.8.8x as it might have something else broken. Unfortunately I can no longer trust the release candidates. Thanks for the input. On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote: On

[asterisk-users] performance/memory

2011-12-29 Thread Matt Hamilton
I have a couple of performance/memory related questions: Is there any downside to using long URIs as far as memory or database (mysql) performance is concerned, e.g. sip:1234567890_1234567...@abc.com? Or is this negligible? Also is there a performance hit if no pattern matching is used?

[asterisk-users] Softphones

2011-12-29 Thread Rebecca Robinson
We are currently using an older version of Eyebeam on our deployment and keep having an issue with the disappearance of SIP accounts, and after research found it is a bug on the version we currently have. I am looking for a new softphone solution and I was wondering what everyone was using

[asterisk-users] Asterisk fail2ban filters - show us yours

2011-12-29 Thread Patrick Lists
Hi, In the thread Interesting attack tonight fail2ban them Bruce B mentioned it would be nice to have input from the Community to come up with the best set of fail2ban filters. That's a great idea. So let's start with Bruce's filters (thanks!) and take it from there. Anyone have any

Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting attack tonight fail2ban them

2011-12-29 Thread Michelle Dupuis
1. I checked the log and I don't see any registration attempt, so I *assume* they simply send an invite, and so they are in the external/outside context of my dialplan. So they are trying to reach extensions which don't exist. If they succesfully registered they would be on the internal

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread David Backeberg
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Danny Nicholas da...@debsinc.com wrote: Can somebody point me to an explanation from Kevin or Tzafir or someone else up the food chain explaining the differences/benefits of 1.6/1.8 vs 1.4/10.0? What's the difference between a car released in 2006 versus a car

Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting attack tonight fail2ban them

2011-12-29 Thread Bruce B
Maybe your logger is not setup properly?! You should get the IP in logs. I can't think of when you won't get the IP in your logs unless the SIP packets are manipulated. That IP is from Voxel.net. You don't have a VPS or service from them do you? 2011/12/29 Michelle Dupuis mdup...@ocg.ca 1. I

[asterisk-users] IAX2 woes

2011-12-29 Thread --[ UxBoD ]--
Hello all, I attempted to make a couple of outbound calls this morning and always got the busy tone. I checked the Asterisk console and was greeted with: [Dec 29 11:29:22] WARNING[12039]: app_dial.c:2218 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'IAX2' (cause 20 - Unknown) ==

Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk fail2ban filters - show us yours

2011-12-29 Thread Bruce B
Hi, I Have added this line for asterisk 1.8 (i have allowguest=yes and context=default in sip.conf): NOTICE.* .*: Call from '.*' (HOST) to extension '.*' rejected because extension not found in context 'default'. Em 29-12-2011 13:03, Patrick Lists escreveu: Hi, In the thread

[asterisk-users] How to create SIP INVITE with different To: Header field than Request-Line URI

2011-12-29 Thread Michael Shore
Hello, I'm trying to interface Asterisk with a third party voicemail system. This voicemail system registers itself as extension 199. This voicemail system gets the DID number (mailbox) from the SIP To: header field. My problem is creating the SIP INVITE with a To: field that's different

[asterisk-users] can't set up tcp sip - sip connection : digest s problem

2011-12-29 Thread sean darcy
Trying to set up a simple sip - sip connection over tcp. Home : 10.0.0 - Office: 1.8.8.0 Home sip.conf: register = tcp://office-going-to-home:password@office-ipaddr/home-coming-from-office [home-coming-from-office] ; receives calls type=friend transport=tcp dtmfmode=rfc2833

Re: [asterisk-users] 1.6 and 1.8

2011-12-29 Thread Ryan Wagoner
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Bruce B bruceb...@gmail.com wrote: Log are being filled with g729 transcoding error in 1.8.7x now :-( I don't dare to test 1.8.8x as it might have something else broken. Unfortunately I can no longer trust the release candidates. Thanks for the input. What

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Registrar / Trunk

2011-12-29 Thread Khaled W. Chehab
Dears, 1-I have a GSM gateway (GOIP) with 8 ports, I used to let every port register to VoIPSwitch in order to know how many minutes does this GSM card, ASR ,ACD on each card. It's too simple on VoIPSwitch to add the registrar client to dial plan ,but in asterisk only I can find trunks How

[asterisk-users] Block Specific Number on Inbound

2011-12-29 Thread Kevin Oravits
Greetings, Is there a way to block a specific inbound number? I've found code online for blocking all nocallerid and all 800, etc. but nothing for a specific number. My company is wanting me to block a specific number. Is this possible in Asterisk 1.4 and 1.6 or do I need to go through my

Re: [asterisk-users] Block Specific Number on Inbound

2011-12-29 Thread Robert Huddleston
Take a look at Blacklist I love that command and love to send nice intercept messages to the other side J From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Oravits Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:40 PM To:

Re: [asterisk-users] Block Specific Number on Inbound

2011-12-29 Thread Stuart Sheldon
Check out the X Boy/Girl friend feature. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+config+extensions.conf Around the middle of the page. Stu -Original Message- From: Kevin Oravits korav...@rcolegal.com Reply-to: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion

[asterisk-users] Asterisk Video Playback - MP4 ad 3GP files

2011-12-29 Thread LL
Hi There, I'm fairly new to asterisk and I'm trying to play a video file during a video call without success for a couple of days now. I've posted a question at stack-overflow describing my problem - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8675713/asterisk-video-playback-mp4-3gp * In short, what

Re: [asterisk-users] Interesting attack tonight fail2ban them

2011-12-29 Thread Jeroen Eeuwes
Hi Michelle, 1. I checked the log and I don't see any registration attempt, so I *assume* they simply send an invite, and so they are in the external/outside context of my dialplan.  So they are trying to reach extensions which don't exist. If they succesfully registered they would be on the