best link for asterisk realtime is below one
http://www.open-voip.org/index.php?title=Asterisk_Full_RealTime_example
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote:
If you check the contrib/realtime/mysql directory in the source tree,
you'll find scripts for almost
The busiest server I am managing reaches 120 concurrent channels (with
mixed recording). It is a dual processor, dual core Intel 5150 with 16 GB
of ram and raid sas controller. The load reaches rarely 3.0.
Having to double the number of channels and due to the 100% call
recordings, I'll go with a
Would a SSD drive be enough or do I need like Raid 10 (4 hard drives)?
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com wrote:
The busiest server I am managing reaches 120 concurrent channels (with
mixed recording). It is a dual processor, dual core Intel 5150 with 16 GB
of
It is not necessary to use an high performance drive. The bottleneck will
be the processor, not the disk. A single disk can handle ten times the load
of 200 ulaw channels.
Leandro
Il giorno 04/ago/2012 12:39, Shahid H shah...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Would a SSD drive be enough or do I need like
Ahh I see. So I might as well get a normal sata disk?
I thought I/O will be Bottleneck as well because 200 channels WAV
recordings to disk at the same time.
Which intel model 16 cores do you recommend? how about 12 cores?
Thanks!
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Leandro Dardini
A single sata disk will be an unacceptable single point of failure. Get
three disks and get in raid5 configuration. You'll gain in safety and
speed. About the CPU model, I am a bit lazy, check the latest CPU released
from intel or amd (I love amd cpu).
Leandro
Il giorno 04/ago/2012 14:30, Shahid
Leandro Dardini ldard...@gmail.com writes:
A single sata disk will be an unacceptable single point of failure. Get
three disks and get in raid5 configuration. You'll gain in safety and
speed.
RAID-5 is slower than single disks when it comes to write IOPS (a commit
is not done until the
Instead of buying expensive disk.. I might setup a ramdisk (about 2GB) to
do 200 calls recordings.
Once the call hangup/completed it will then move recording file to SATA HDD.
What do you think of this?
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Benny Amorsen benny+use...@amorsen.dkwrote:
Leandro
Benny is right, if writes are smaller than the stripe size, there is no
gain in speed in using raid5. Not only, but you can have lower performance
than a single disk.
The ramdisk can be a good idea, but if the load is somewhat constant, you
end only moving the slow write ahead of time. 200 calls
Un-top-posting...
2012/8/4 Shahid H shah...@gmail.com
Instead of buying expensive disk.. I might setup a ramdisk (about 2GB)
to do 200 calls recordings. Once the call hangup/completed it will then
move recording file to SATA HDD.
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Leandro Dardini wrote:
Benny is right,
Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com writes:
Won't 200 simultaneous calls result in a lot of 'head thrashing' that
would be avoided by staging the recordings to some form of
non-mechanical storage and then copying the the recording at the
completion of the call?
The extX family of file
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Shahid H shah...@gmail.com wrote:
Instead of buying expensive disk.. I might setup a ramdisk (about 2GB) to
do 200 calls recordings.
Once the call hangup/completed it will then move recording file to SATA
HDD.
What do you think of this?
You want some
That's how we do it - write to a memory based (ramdisk) disk then write to HDD
upon call completion. We haven't tried a SSD but that may be necessary
depending on your call volumes.
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
Yep, maxmsg is set to some value and it reached. To make things work again
i've moved que messages to a new directory and voicemail is working now.
2012/8/3 Steve Edwards asterisk@sedwards.com
Un-top-posting...
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Luis H. Forchesatto wrote:
I've made a call to our
14 matches
Mail list logo
