[asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Jonson Player
Hello, I have strange situation with asterisk 1.8.18.0 , randomly i got this message in cli: WARNING[15925] asterisk.c: No more connections allowed All connections freeze and all extensions doesn't work anymore. Is any bug or is any setting that can solve this problem? Thank you. Jonson.

[asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread gincantalupo
Hi all, I have problems dialling out because my new telco (the previous gave no problems) tells me my PBX adds a leading 0 and that's why I cannot dial out (but I can receive calls). I make a small extensions.conf as a test: exten = 666,1,Dial(DAHDI/g1/339xx) but cannot dial out

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Leandro Dardini
2012/11/20 gincantalupo gincantal...@fgasoftware.com Hi all, I have problems dialling out because my new telco (the previous gave no problems) tells me my PBX adds a leading 0 and that's why I cannot dial out (but I can receive calls). I make a small extensions.conf as a test: exten =

[asterisk-users] 回覆︰ tcptls ssl connection error

2012-11-20 Thread kingman chui
Hi,   I set up tls and srtp with lyn and asterisk 1.8 before. I think your ssl connection is not setup . so, it may due to key and certificate problem. If the key and cert is ok with CA, the ssl connection will up auto..   I work this before and I can connect to lync server with TLS and srtp

[asterisk-users] info on : CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE

2012-11-20 Thread upendra
Hi, just going through the code i found that this CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE undef in the voicebus then how it will defined to run the echo cancell on the respective drievers wctdm24xxp ?? explain how this CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE enabled and where it is enabled while run time.

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread gincantalupo
Hi Leandro, thanks for your answer. I already have tried those parameters but without any positive result. The telco technician has tried the line with its machine and it worked...remote telco technicians say they get a leading zero... I'm thinking there is something strange in the middle

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Leandro Dardini
That is a real mistery! I like a lots these cases when all seems not working despite all being correctly configured, but you know first or later you'll find the answer. From your website, it seems you are selling/renting PBX based on asterisk, so you can be sure nobody has messed with the

Re: [asterisk-users] addressing peers dynamically

2012-11-20 Thread Joshua Colp
Andre Gronwald wrote: it is just because i think that something is not wrong (which is correct, because i address a currently not existing peer). and if there is a way to handle it better, then i would like to know it (virtual queues is just oversized, but maybe there is a simple usage of

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Joshua Colp
Jonson Player wrote: Hello, Hola, I have strange situation with asterisk 1.8.18.0 , randomly i got this message in cli: WARNING[15925] asterisk.c: No more connections allowed This message is output when the number of Asterisk consoles (asterisk -r instances) has reached the limit. This

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 - Subscriber absent)

2012-11-20 Thread Joshua Colp
Face wrote: Well, thanks for responding. I went back to 10.10.0 and things seem to be working fine now! This is certainly good to know but I'd like to know why upgrading to 11 did not seem to work for you. This is the first case since it's been out where it doesn't appear to have been

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Matthew Jordan
On 11/20/2012 03:32 AM, Jonson Player wrote: Hello, I have strange situation with asterisk 1.8.18.0 , randomly i got this message in cli: WARNING[15925] asterisk.c: No more connections allowed All connections freeze and all extensions doesn't work anymore. Is any bug or is any setting

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread gincantalupo
Hi Leandro, I'm sure nobody has added something... tried prilocaldialplan and pridialplan but nothing changed. Question: if pridialplan or prilocaldialplan would work, should I see the 0 inside PRI frame with intense debug or it is hidden? Yes...the technician did it...there is only one

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Frederic Van Espen
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:03 +0100, gincantalupo wrote: I'm sure nobody has added something... tried prilocaldialplan and pridialplan but nothing changed. Question: if pridialplan or prilocaldialplan would work, should I see the 0 inside PRI frame with intense debug or it is hidden? Somebody

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Leandro Dardini
Not only, you have to restart dahdi/zaptel as well. Leandro 2012/11/20 Frederic Van Espen frederic...@gmail.com On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 15:03 +0100, gincantalupo wrote: I'm sure nobody has added something... tried prilocaldialplan and pridialplan but nothing changed. Question: if

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
You've exceeded the allowed maximum number of simultaneous remote console connections (128). While it may be a bit aggressive to have it kill all current connected consoles, its also a bit excessive to have 128 connected remote consoles. While the behaviour may not be entirely desirable, this

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
In my past experience the best recourse for dealing with a DAHDI trunked asterisk system is this sequence Service asterisk stop Service dahdi restart Service asterisk start From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Leandro

Re: [asterisk-users] info on : CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE

2012-11-20 Thread Shaun Ruffell
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:18:12PM +0530, upendra wrote: Hi, just going through the code i found that this CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE undef in the voicebus then how it will defined to run the echo cancell on the respective drievers wctdm24xxp ?? explain how this

[asterisk-users] Simultaneous caller/callee hangup; hangup extensions execute only once; unable to determine if destination channel up

2012-11-20 Thread John Hurst
Hello This is a question regarding whether there's any way within hangup extensions to determine whether the caller or callee leg (or both) of a bridged call has hung up. The test case I have is running under Asterisk 1.8.17.0, but the behaviour is observed in 1.8.18.0 (and also 1.6.2.18).

Re: [asterisk-users] leading ghost 0

2012-11-20 Thread Alex Kauffmann
On 11/20/2012 8:03 AM, gincantalupo wrote: Hi Leandro, I'm sure nobody has added something... tried prilocaldialplan and pridialplan but nothing changed. Question: if pridialplan or prilocaldialplan would work, should I see the 0 inside PRI frame with intense debug or it is hidden? Yes...the

Re: [asterisk-users] Simultaneous caller/callee hangup; hangup extensions execute only once; unable to determine if destination channel up

2012-11-20 Thread Richard Mudgett
This is a question regarding whether there's any way within hangup extensions to determine whether the caller or callee leg (or both) of a bridged call has hung up. The test case I have is running under Asterisk 1.8.17.0, but the behaviour is observed in 1.8.18.0 (and also 1.6.2.18).

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Jonson Player
Hello Josua, Thank you for this answers: First of all, yes i run in crontab at 15 min an analyzing script which collect show sip channels with asterisk -rx . This could be my problem... I think that this commands could remain stalled and doesn't logout after execution of command. A friend of

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Jonson Player
Hello Danny, Could you tell me how can i put time out at execution of remote commands with asterisk -rx show sip channels. I think that is my problem... after i execute asterisk -rx commands something remain stalled and somehow i think that could block my asterisk... I mean all new connections

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Jonson Player
Hello Matthew, Could I rise with some option the number of simultaneous console? I don't have simultaneous console but is good to know in case i didn't get any other workaround to fix this problem. Thank you. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Matthew Jordan mjor...@digium.com wrote: On

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Eric Wieling
No, you don't need your script for this. Prevent attacks by using fail2ban to block brute force attacks using iptables, securing your server at the OS level, and NEVER EVER EVER let leave the web GUI for FreePBX open to the internet. I'm sure others have more suggestions. Over the years 100%

Re: [asterisk-users] No more connections allowed.

2012-11-20 Thread Danny Nicholas
My suggestion would be to issue a core restart when convenient around midnight, assuming your installation doesn't do 24/7 calls. From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jonson Player Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 3:54 PM

Re: [asterisk-users] If would possible use a custom function in Asterisk Dialplan

2012-11-20 Thread Andrew White
Hey Longst, I'd recommend having a look into the LUA support Asterisk offers for its dialplans or AGI. These are the only realistic ways to add functions, unless you want to write your own C module and compile it in. Adhearsion is an option as well, if you are proficient with ruby. Cheers,

[asterisk-users] watchdog like functions

2012-11-20 Thread asterisk asterisk
I wish to ask if there is way to keep IAX trunk connection up. I have a small server on Xen VPS but notice that my IAX trunk drops after some time. I understand there is cron job to function as sip watchdog. My asterisk is 11.0.1 Thanks for suggestions. CK --

Re: [asterisk-users] watchdog like functions

2012-11-20 Thread Carlos Alvarez
Switching to SIP is likely your best solution. IAX is buggy. Always has been, and I'll bet always will be. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:34 PM, asterisk asterisk aster...@ck-lee.comwrote: I wish to ask if there is way to keep IAX trunk connection up. I have a small server on Xen VPS but notice

Re: [asterisk-users] info on : CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE

2012-11-20 Thread upendra
Hi , it implies that under this CONFIG_VOICEBUS_ECREFERENCE code inside this condition will never execute. if we need it should be defined . Regards Upendra On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Shaun Ruffell sruff...@digium.com wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:18:12PM +0530, upendra wrote:

Re: [asterisk-users] Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 - Subscriber absent)

2012-11-20 Thread Face
I upgrading to 11 because I want to use the MessageSend command from the AMI, ver 10 dose not have MessageSend In the list of commands. Unfortunately I remove ver 11 and I dont think I can provide the information you asked. On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Joshua Colp jc...@digium.com wrote:

[asterisk-users] core show translation - difference in Asterisk Versions

2012-11-20 Thread Salman Zafar
Hello All, I was wondering if somebody could elaborate the change in translation of codecs specifically the amount of time increased in Asterisk 11. For example *Asterisk 11* ***alaw **speex * *gsm **15000 **15000 * *ulaw9150 15000* * * *Asterisk 1.6.x* *