Of ad...@3a.hu
Sent: 8. marts 2014 21:28
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk
My approach (in theory only, so please correct me if I'm wrong) would be to
run asterisk on multiple boxes (one each). A dedicated
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 20:27 +, ad...@3a.hu wrote:
My approach (in theory only, so please correct me if I'm wrong) would be
to run asterisk on multiple boxes (one each). A dedicated monitoring
box (nagios? custom scripts?) would perform frequent checks against the
boxes (one of my
My approach (in theory only, so please correct me if I'm wrong) would be
to run asterisk on multiple boxes (one each). A dedicated monitoring
box (nagios? custom scripts?) would perform frequent checks against the
boxes (one of my previous projects one asterisk was using call files to
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Mitul Limbani mi...@enterux.in wrote:
Hello,
Using Single Server with multiple VMs essentially kills the purpose, coz it
doesnt protect against physical hardware failures.
To save costs, use low end box as failover, to keep u in business, till
primary box
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus unive...@truemetal.org wrote:
Hi Thorolf,
Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa:
Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other option, on
systems with low load this works reliable, but what happens on systems
with high load? Are there
Good post.
Actually this is the architecture we have.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Paul Belanger paul.belan...@polybeacon.com
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus unive...@truemetal.org wrote:
Hi Thorolf,
Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa:
Using
On 2014-03-07 17:31, Paul Belanger wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Markus unive...@truemetal.org wrote:
Hi Thorolf,
Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa:
Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other option, on
systems with low load this works reliable, but what
On 07/03/14 16:52, Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
Sorry, for the stupid question, but what happens if Kamailio fails ?
We have two copies on different servers which make use of keepalived to
provide a virtual IP address between them. We also have them connected
to two databases with
Hi everybody,
what are the current options to get an Asterisk-system high available?
Using two servers as active/passive with DRBD, Pacemaker/Corosync works
very good, there are no quality issues of the voice quality, even not on
high loaded servers and no problems with a lot of small packages.
-users-boun...@lists.digium.com on behalf of Thorolf Godawa
nos...@godawa.de
Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2014 10:21 AM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: [asterisk-users] High Availability with Asterisk
Hi everybody,
what are the current options to get an Asterisk-system high available?
Using two
Hello,
Using Single Server with multiple VMs essentially kills the purpose, coz it
doesnt protect against physical hardware failures.
To save costs, use low end box as failover, to keep u in business, till
primary box goes live.
Mitul
On Mar 6, 2014 8:51 PM, Thorolf Godawa nos...@godawa.de
On 6/3/14 3:21 pm, Thorolf Godawa wrote:
The idea would be having a HA-cluster of two servers with Xen, each of
them runs one instance of an Asterisk-system in a single VM and on a
failure the VM will be restarted on the other node.
This might result in a much higher load on this node, because
Hi Thorolf,
Am 06.03.2014 16:21, schrieb Thorolf Godawa:
Using (para-)virtualization with Xen could be an other option, on
systems with low load this works reliable, but what happens on systems
with high load? Are there any issues known about problems with the
realtime, packet loss etc. because
: [Asterisk-Users] High Availability on Asterisk
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if Asterisk (installed on Linux or Free BSD) have
any
possibility of high availability (such as, if one box down, the other
one
get all configuration)?
F5 networks currently makes a layer-7
Hi,
I would like to know if Asterisk (installed on Linux or Free BSD) have any
possibility of high availability (such as, if one box down, the other one
get all configuration)?
If yes:
1 - how can I do that?
2 - Who is using that?
3 - How long is using?
4 - How Many SIP phones is using on
Hello,
Yes, there is high availability, Clustering and Load Balancing. Each
one has its own advantage and disadvantages.
First option is one that you mention High Availability. This option you
have a second machine watching heartbeats from the primary machine.
when the heartbeats stop the
Hi,
I would like to know if Asterisk (installed on Linux or Free BSD) have any
possibility of high availability (such as, if one box down, the other one
get all configuration)?
F5 networks currently makes a layer-7 SIP aware load balancer. I was on
a call with them on Friday and their
Matthew Boehm wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if Asterisk (installed on Linux or Free BSD) have any
possibility of high availability (such as, if one box down, the other one
get all configuration)?
F5 networks currently makes a layer-7 SIP aware load balancer. I was on
a call with them on
18 matches
Mail list logo
