On 03/13/2014 01:13 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
-1
Prefer top posting.
Easy to see if I want to scroll down to see if it is something
interesting to me.
I get a lot of e-mails each day and scrolling wastes too much time.
But if you have a solution to a problem that I raise, please feel free
to
On Thu, March 13, 2014 15:32, Kevin Larsen wrote:
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
+1-1 = 0
I do not care about where people put their replies so long as I can figure out
who is answering what. What I do not like to read is
If the sequence was really important, we would just move this whole list
to a LinkedIn group and have a much better environment for following
threads and managing the profiles of the group's members.
This is a pretty old system of managing peer support but it always takes
a while to get legacy
(If you want to reply to this message, this is not where your reply goes)
Please, for the benefit of anyone reading the archives in search of answers to
a question, when replying to messages on this list, can everyone try to follow
the natural flow of conversation? That is, position your
-1
Prefer top posting.
Easy to see if I want to scroll down to see if it is something
interesting to me.
I get a lot of e-mails each day and scrolling wastes too much time.
But if you have a solution to a problem that I raise, please feel free
to post it anywhere you like.
On 13/03/2014
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Ron Wheeler wrote:
-1
Prefer top posting.
Your preferences are in conflict with the mailing list rules
(http://www.asterisk.org/community/discuss), specifically #5.
It has to be all one way or the other. This is an English language list.
Thus, the natural expectation
: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts
On Thu, 13 Mar 2014, Ron Wheeler wrote:
-1
Prefer top posting.
Your preferences are in conflict with the mailing list rules
(http://www.asterisk.org/community/discuss), specifically #5.
It has to be all one way or the other. This is an English language list
-software.com
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM
To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users
: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Edwards
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM
To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non
matt.hosk...@npgco.com
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 2:46 PM
To: Asterisk Users List
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Terry Brummell
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:44 PM
: [asterisk-users] Replying to Posts
-Original Message-
From: asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-boun...@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Steve Edwards
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:39 PM
To: rwhee...@artifact-software.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.
On 13/3/14 5:13 pm, Ron Wheeler wrote:
-1
Prefer top posting.
Easy to see if I want to scroll
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.
Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it would
appear. Lotus
On 3/13/2014 11:33 AM, A J Stiles wrote:
If you need to make a point-by-point argument, split up your reply --
a critical piece to this component is proper quoting.
the person replying needs to differentiate between what he is writing
and what is is replying to. notice the in front of what
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.
Kevin Larson sez:
Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or nothing setting it would
Don Kelly wrote:
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.
Kevin Larson sez:
Outlook can quote correctly, but it is an all or
On 13/03/2014 9:32 PM, Don Kelly wrote:
On 13/3/14 6:27 pm, Eric Wieling wrote:
This is an example of why I top post. Who wrote what?
Of course, if you use a mail client that's capable of quoting correctly,
it all works beautifully.
Kevin Larson sez:
Outlook can quote correctly, but
17 matches
Mail list logo
