hi,
Yesterday I have taken backports and ath10k code from git and compiled. My
kernel
version is 3.12. There are following compilation errors due to include file
genetlink.h.
/home/shw/kavita/backports/backports-output-11Dec17/net/wireless/nl80211.c:6323:36:
error: macro
On Montag, 11. Dezember 2017 18:50:09 CET ako...@codeaurora.org wrote:
[...]
> >> > Just tried this on an QCA9984 which doesn't seem to have the
> >> > calibration data in the PCI EEPROM.
> >> >
> >> > [ 71.728929] ath10k_pci :01:00.0: qca9984/qca9994 hw1.0
> >> > target 0x0100
HL1.0 firmware branch, used in wcn3990, transmits management
frames by reference over WMI.
Add support for management tx by reference over WMI.
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai
Signed-off-by: Govind Singh
---
This patchset includes the WMI changes for wcn3390 to
Refactor service ready event parsing,
Add management frame tx by refernce over wmi,
Add hw parameters for wcn3990.
Changes since v2
- Fix ath-check warnings
1) Using plain integer as NULL pointer
2) incorrect type in assignment
3)
Due to the limitation of wmi tlv parsing logic, if there are
two parameters in a wmi event with same tlv tag, we can get only
the last value, as it overwrites the prev value of the same tlv tag.
The service ready event in wcn3990 contains two parameters of the
same tag UINT32, due to which the
The parameter values for skid limit, number of peers and wds
entries values which are sent in wmi init cmd are hardware
specific.
Add support to obtain skid limit, number of peers and wds entries
values from hw params which will have the hw specific values
for these parameters.
Signed-off-by:
Add hw params entry for wcn3990 and populate various
target specific values for wcn3990.
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pillai
Signed-off-by: Govind Singh
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c | 18 ++
On 2017-12-08 19:10, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Freitag, 8. Dezember 2017 18:05:38 CET ako...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2017-12-08 17:42, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 25. Mai 2017 16:21:23 CET ako...@qti.qualcomm.com wrote:
>> From: Anilkumar Kolli
>>
>>