On 06/16/2015 08:24 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
I am with the OP on this, having worked in a cloud security company I
understand why they block port 22 out bound and know it to be a common
problem. It is blocked to stop employees accidentally or intentionally
leaking important customer or business
Actually they very often strip https traffic too. I used to work for
Symantec.cloud and we did both http and https scanning so don't try to say
that it is not a valid argument as I assure you you can scan and do content
filtering on https.
On 16 June 2015 at 14:35, Manuel Reimer
oh ok thank you for helping out Jonny. So koral will be the maintainer in
AUR4 ?
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net wrote:
Am 16.06.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Oozy Slug:
Hi,
My AUR username is *oozyslug*
I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently
Hi,
My AUR username is *oozyslug*
I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently adopted) to AUR4 .
My ssh key and config setup are proper since i dont have any trouble with
my other aur package *gedit-rust-git*
I am able to git clone the nix empty repo
* git clone
Am 16.06.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Johannes Dewender:
Am 16.06.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Oozy Slug:
Hi,
My AUR username is *oozyslug*
I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently adopted) to AUR4 .
* git-receive-pack: permission denied: oozyslug*
What can i do to correct the problem.
Am 16.06.2015 um 18:40 schrieb Oozy Slug:
Hi,
My AUR username is *oozyslug*
I am unable to upload the *nix* aur package (i recently adopted) to AUR4 .
My ssh key and config setup are proper since i dont have any trouble with
my other aur package *gedit-rust-git*
I am able to git clone the
sorry that was a dumb question ... thank you for your help again
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, Oozy Slug oozys...@gmail.com wrote:
oh ok thank you for helping out Jonny. So koral will be the maintainer in
AUR4 ?
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015, Johannes Dewender a...@jonnyjd.net
Em 16-06-2015 14:20, Alan Jenkins escreveu:
Also may I remind you that the focus of this conversation is allowing users
in corporate environments access to be able to contribute to the AUR. These
environments block SSH for multiple reasons but are able to allow HTTPS as
they are able to more
Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access
available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you
maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or
just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the moment, all other arguments
regarding
Hey Giancario,
Most of the large companies block everything and start from there, normally
everything is blocked outbound and only things that are business critical
are allowed until the business is able to function. In many cases they will
block all outbound traffic and only allow access to the
Em 16-06-2015 17:22, Alan Jenkins escreveu:
Most of the large companies block everything and start from there,
normally everything is blocked outbound and only things that are
business critical are allowed until the business is able to function.
In many cases they will block all outbound
On 16 June 2015 at 14:44, Phillip Smith fuka...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 June 2015 at 14:26, Eli Schwartz eschwart...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW you can use filter-branch to run mksrcinfo on each folder in your
current aur-packages repo, then merge in my base branch and continue on
as
before.
Not sure why exactly I had it using a subtree pull ( /smack ) rather
than add, but I did fix this.
-- Eli Schwartz
.
On 6/16/2015 6:00 PM, Joost Bremmer wrote:
Just init a fresh repo, then add your packages and run: git subtree
add -P stenc aur:/stenc.git master Note that you'll have to make a
bogus first commit (for git rev-parse as I understand it), just an
empty README.md will do, you can even remove it
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:11:59PM -0300, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 16-06-2015 17:22, Alan Jenkins escreveu:
[...]
The problem is that no matter how hard you moan at the people in
control of the firewalls they will normally not allow access to
something unless *they* deem it to be secure,
I am with the OP on this, having worked in a cloud security company I
understand why they block port 22 out bound and know it to be a common
problem. It is blocked to stop employees accidentally or intentionally
leaking important customer or business data. You can also use SSH to bypass
security
On 15 June 2015 at 21:33, Giancarlo Razzolini grazzol...@gmail.com wrote:
Em 15-06-2015 16:26, Tom Swartz escreveu:
With all due respect, requiring that a user punch holes in their security
firewalls is not a proper or long term solution to the issue at hand.
It is the only solution.
AFAICS
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 11:57:26 -0400
Tom Swartz t...@tswartz.net wrote:
Hi all,
The majority of my work happens behind corporate firewalls where ssh out
via port 22 is not an option.
Is there a way to configure GitHub-like SSH via HTTPS ports?
Good morning,
I would like to know if someone could help me in finding a problem.
Actually, I was trying to build my package, but, as you now, on every
GCC major update, something goes wrong.
I wrote a little patch for fixing a not working check (the one with
'toplevel' in its name) but now I'm
* Giovanni Santini giovannisantin...@yahoo.it [2015-06-16 09:51:58 +0200]:
Good morning,
I would like to know if someone could help me in finding a problem.
Please start a new thread for a different issue rather than replying
to an existing mail and changing the subject - otherwise it's rather
Le mardi 16 juin 2015 01:37:36 Doug Newgard a écrit :
What it comes down to is that you want Arch to provide a way for you to
bypass security restrictions your employer has put into place. Does this
really sound like a good idea?
But Arch should be more committed and friendly to its
Thunderbird thinks he has sended it. Uff, nevermind.
Sending it again (I hope Thunderbird won't troll me again)
Il 16/06/2015 09:56, Florian Bruhin ha scritto:
* Giovanni Santini giovannisantin...@yahoo.it [2015-06-16 09:51:58 +0200]:
Good morning,
I would like to know if someone could help me
I am with the OP on this, having worked in a cloud security company I
understand why they block port 22 out bound and know it to be a common
problem. It is blocked to stop employees accidentally or intentionally
leaking important customer or business data. You can also use SSH to bypass
Seems Thunderbird hates me.
Here you have:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4152736/gcc44-multilib_future.tar.gz
Il 16/06/2015 10:01, Giovanni Santini ha scritto:
Thunderbird thinks he has sended it. Uff, nevermind.
Sending it again (I hope Thunderbird won't troll me again)
Il 16/06/2015
=== Signoff report for [community-testing] ===
https://www.archlinux.org/packages/signoffs/
There are currently:
* 150 new packages in last 24 hours
* 0 known bad packages
* 0 packages not accepting signoffs
* 0 fully signed off packages
* 155 packages missing signoffs
* 4 packages older than 14
* Alexander Görtz a...@nyloc.de (Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:04:51 +0200):
I think that this is a reason more to implement an alternative of
uploading a aur ball, as discussed in another thread, and creating a
git commit from it. I don't know any implementation details, but this
shouldn't be too hard
26 matches
Mail list logo
