package reviews for TU candidates. So
yeah,
I think I did the right thing.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpAxg_s9cvZG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em setembro 7, 2020 16:27 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu:
Keeping TU rights just for voting isn't the right thing to do, so, I therefore
step down as a TU.
This is my *personal* opinion, I'm not professing, nor imposing any moral
judgment
on anyone doing precisely that. Just
thing to do, so, I therefore
step down as a TU.
I'll keep working on mkinitcpio and on devops, and I will continue to be
available
to *everyone*. Please, one of you remove my TU permissions on aurweb. Thank you
all.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp5HbyzRhsb5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em julho 28, 2020 9:46 Filipe Laíns escreveu:
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 14:43 -1000, Gaetan Bisson via arch-dev-public wrote:
[2020-07-27 21:10:23 -0300] Giancarlo Razzolini:
> Em julho 27, 2020 21:03 Gaetan Bisson escreveu:
> > It's quite unsettling that we seem to be rushing to write a
uns as a service on Arch servers should
be properly tracked on ansible, even if it's a user service.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgplaRV8oY48A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em julho 27, 2020 9:35 Henry-Joseph Audéoud escreveu:
On 24/07/2020 21:24, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
The migration is almost done. Since we are moving to a new machine, it will
have new host keys. They are:
Ed25519: SHA256:RFzBCUItH9LZS0cKB5UE6ceAYhBD5C8GeOBip8Z11+4
Em julho 23, 2020 17:09 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu:
Hi All,
In continuing with the improvements being done to our infrastructure, we're
planning to migrate the AUR to another machine. This means that, during the
migration,
there *will* be downtime of the whole AUR.
I expect
Em julho 23, 2020 19:45 Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general escreveu:
Thanks for taking the time! I hope there won't be any weird unforeseen
problems.
Sure. I wrote a checklist for the migration [0], to try to avoid issues. I
could've
missed soemthing, if you spot anything, please edit the
(Friday)
or on Saturday, depending on availability.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpkbRsNpQ8Mo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em maio 21, 2020 8:29 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu:
The discussion period is over. Let's vote!
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=121
The voting period is over and we have a result:
Yes: 39
No: 3
Abstain: 9
Participation: 92.73%
So, I guess it's official, welcome to the team
/6a1f6efae06f137b6d93f7f66973a6272766fe1d
Thank you
Frederik
The discussion period is over. Let's vote!
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=121
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpGGcNnzbvey.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em maio 12, 2020 12:06 Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general escreveu:
Em maio 7, 2020 2:50 Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general escreveu:
Discussion period shall last until 2020-05-12.
This is just a reminder that today is the last day for discussion on this
application.
Tomorrow I'll create
Em maio 7, 2020 2:50 Sven-Hendrik Haase via aur-general escreveu:
Discussion period shall last until 2020-05-12.
This is just a reminder that today is the last day for discussion on this
application.
Tomorrow I'll create a vote on the AUR.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpiuVSJwMXCN.pgp
!
Frederik
I confirm the sponsorship of Frederik. I see the discussion already started
though but,
I'd suggest you guys wait until Sven also confirms.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpmVAdzQKbD0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. The gitlab
package will continue working after it gets dropped, just won't be updated
anymore until someone
wishes to maintain it on the AUR.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgptVN7cKYC6a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of packages that already are
on the official repositories.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpV30JRFk1mq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
query/edit that list in a better fashion than directly
manipulating
the DB will certainly make it more appealing.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpPRnPgdiWFx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uld probably start adding a few packages to that list.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpky0H51YAfH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that name is good at
all.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpqbLEv__n3Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
?
It is not clear from this email what is it.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgprbLozGukpb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
proposal is 119, but it has not ended yet. If,
during
the discussion period, Ray ends up voting on that one, we'll have to stop this
process.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpVf039owP1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
xplc
zim
Florian
Hi,
Can you also send a signed email?
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpS0XUge6X0r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of kpcyrd sponsors, I can vouch for him as well.
Given that I've worked with him in the past.
He's a very nice person to work with and quite technically skilled.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpfV42IlocC0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I've talked with him
privately
regarding this application process. While he failed to disclose that he had
asked another
TU before, I don't think it was in bad faith.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp5E50PKzsYr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ver, you risk to end up quasi accidentally in the spam filters of
our MUA's ;).
Well, some TU already found it and suspended it already, so all good (with the
exception of the malformed email)
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgphySaoA2gVH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as your second sponsor to reply to this thread so we can start the
discussion period?
Ideally, Alexander should also sign his email, like Sergej did. Our bylaws
unfortunately do not
mention this, neither does our wiki.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpGexMuoxU2c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hear from both sponsors
telling us they actively sponsor Jean's application. Then the discussion
period can begin.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpGE6wYuDNv9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in the first place will not be tolerated.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp7tKwOeKjro.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em maio 7, 2019 14:00 Lone_Wolf escreveu:
It seems I overreacted and hijacked my own thread.
I also made several mistakes and may have (unintentionally) offended people.
I apoligise to all posters in & readers of this thread.
There are decisions that need to be made, but I'm the one that
to focus on the bad stuff, or just wash it away with good stuff. After all,
we're all a sum of all that, good or bad.
I appreciate that your sponsors are also backing you up in this, not just
technically. Thanks and I wish you luck.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp8FCZAVasBq.pgp
Description: PGP
are something we need to also take in
consideration.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp4X5r5V6QrH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
as the sponsors? Also, if we are heading
this direction of having a different set, other than the sponsors, of TUs
requiring
to review the PKGBUILD's, shouldn't this also be added to the bylaws?
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpMljxvL_dmc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
assuming this is a multilib package. If not, you can
build with extra-x86_64-build.
Both these commands run namcap for each stage. You can send those plus your
PKGBUILD and then we can start helping you. Without those, we're just guessing
now.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpEMcmUuKKpY.pgp
Description
questions not related to packaging and arch? Then at least lets make
sure they can prepare for it. Or, preferably, can we please focus on packaging?
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Trusted_Users#How_do_I_become_a_TU?
pgpxNdjHvrO2v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
confident for reasons that do not need to be exposed on the
list.
(Don't forget that moderation means to arbitrate, not to censor.)
The list is now in emergency moderation.
Regard,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpPpL5RQy6oo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
into emergency moderation if this continues. I'm confident
all the parties understood what happened by now and how to avoid this in the
future.
Thanks to all,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpQQwIn3OFxE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
you
co-maintaining, if
you get elected, however. I'm a hardcore user of znc as well.
Good luck,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpPy31LiOsLv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD
Look my email address domain portion.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpyPiIGG1Tey.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpeI2HcVOxYK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
back.
Hi Pierre,
Thanks for your work on Arch. And good luck with this new project.
- xss-lock
I would adopt this, since I use it.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpvxxEmtG01Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
e standard procedure should be followed.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpcsRZbjxxMp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em janeiro 12, 2018 17:14 NicoHood escreveu:
Just to be sure:
YES = Delete
NO = Keep
Correct?
We had this discussion and more on the IRC channel. But you're
correct on your assumption, YES mean TU removal. No, to keep
them.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpwr6O5WbOqt.pgp
Description: PGP
Em dezembro 28, 2017 11:53 Curi0 via aur-general escreveu:
Hi I used zcq...@gmail.com instead of zkq...@gmail.com username name is
Curi0.
I have fixed your account.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpFJdF5LXIQU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tu/?id=97
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpHIuXLmQ_rT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Debian does I guess or does every package implictly depend on
'build-essential'.
+1 for using devtools and extra-x86_64-build for AUR packages too. I have
been doing that for a while now, and it does catch a lot of issues.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgp0bJ7KqGJ9q.pgp
Description: PGP
and redistributing that wouldn't infringe anything, but I will take a second
look at this. It would certainly be nice not to have to download from their
site which is, indeed, slow.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpdX5vgR8SCd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on a daily basis. I'll revisit this soon.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpqi3hGnTPyn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em julho 24, 2017 12:03 Dan Printzell escreveu:
Would it count as a good bribe if I created a PKGBUILD that generates fresh
tacos?
If it passes anthraxx's crive, why not?
pgp3WnttHw1x4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em março 29, 2017 4:32 Baptiste Jonglez escreveu:
So, I didn't think such a technical question would spark so much passion!
Maybe this discussion should indeed go to arch-dev-public.
In the meantime, I see 4 positions emerge from the discussion:
1) packages in "base" *should* be explicitely
?
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpB_KDSAosYl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpQu8AMP50sI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
that, I haven't looked
yet at your packages,
but I don't think switching Windows users to Manjaro, even though not related
with the TU proposal
itself, doesn't bring you many votes. I'll wait on your sponsor so we can
start the discussion
period.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpZiCekDSHEe.pgp
axx?
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgplz_0IsNAnG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
willing
to take up the maintenance job of this AUR package.
Could some TU take the time to have a look at this package?
There are still 8 days left for this request to be accepted. If the
current maintainer doesn't take action by then, then the orphan request
will be accepted.
Cheers,
Giancarlo
en benefit other distributions. Otherwise I'd go
with the 7.2.p2 scheme. Messing with epoch should be your last resort.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpum7cmXcdk3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
begin. Use the tools for the job, makepkg
and, devtools. Let the helpers to deal with it. It's their job to make
sure your package installs (provided you follow best practices).
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
on the TODO right now.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpTtkOiRZFGJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Em outubro 23, 2016 22:17 Levente Polyak escreveu:
On 10/24/2016 01:32 AM, Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
Well I actually don't planned to jump in again on this topic... but if
you fully agree on all that, then it pretty much boils down to the fact
that you definitively want to get
don't get in, has been much fruitful. I will
continue helping either way, whenever I can.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpCrgqWtMIDA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
manage to port it, then we will see.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpOWhv2iADdh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for documentation. Some of them
already have wiki entries documenting their install process. Some do not.
I will probably move that text to a proper file in /usr/share/doc and will
also improve their documentation on the github.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpzEXO8_XYT2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for the input,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpEi23piR2jJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi All,
My name is Giancarlo Razzolini (grazzolini) and I would like to become a TU.
Before anything, I want to thank Jelle van der Waa for agreeing to become my
sponsor.
I'm 33 years old. I am a developer and infrastructure manager at my own
company. I have been using Linux since 1999
GBUILD for each dependency (and
sub dependencies, and so on) and install them before installing your
package, them being on AUR or on the official repos.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
take care of the dependencies. And follow the packaging guidelines that
are on the wiki.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
ou can also know what is
happening with the project more closely.
> Am I supposed to get an email when someone flags one of my
> packages?
Yes, you're supposed to get an e-mail. But it won't hurt to login now
and then on the aur page.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
I'm not sure, but it might be related to this:
https://www.archlinux.org/news/downtime-rsync-mail/
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
g able to use your keys on any machine you want to use, without the
need to copy private keys around. But please, don't say that using an
agent is nonsense.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
, then it was probably hidden. If it wasn't migrated, then you
will need to check one of the mirrors [0], and re-upload it to the new AUR.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
[0]
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Git_repositories_for_AUR3_packages
the new maintainer for it.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
. For packages not migrated, I don't
think there is a repo there.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
migrated are on the aur-mirror. The
packages that were, and then were hidden, are still there. Try and see.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
that arch
shouldn't maintain these packages. But since you're doing it anyway,
then perhaps there could be a place with all these orphaned hidden
repos, so someone willing could search there and resubmit it to AUR if
that is the case.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
-maintainer functionality.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
they are in orphaned status, they can't. But,
then again, if someone adopt it, then it wouldn't be deleted, and we
wouldn't be having this discussion.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
useless
or broken.
Oprhan packages can't be updated, right? And, even if it wasn't update
for years before it was disowned, doesn't meant it was not useful
anymore. The metric here should be based on relevance (actual PKGBUILD
downloads) and time since it become orphan.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
orphaned packages to stay around for
some time, I suggest you guys implement it and send a diff. Perhaps
something that prevents even a TU from deleting (hiding) a orphaned
package that isn't orphan long enough, lets say, a couple of months.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
to point this out.
There are some ones, with patches and all sort of changes, that are
harder to write. In those cases it helps to have the PKGBUILD (and
patches) at hand. Again, I'm not against them being somewhere, perhaps
an all in one github repo.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
and didn't uploaded then before
the July 8th deadline. At the moment we have only 23 orphan packages in
AUR. Let's keep things that way.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
shouldn't spend resources on an
official one.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 29-07-2015 11:52, Simon Hanna escreveu:
please bottom-post
+1
understand that there is no way to prove its privacy though.
There are user purges now and then, so you might regain your username in
the future. But the purges, AFAIK, are manual, no automatic purging.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
worried about packages you've owned, if they weren't uploaded yet
to AUR4, you can regain their ownership by simply creating then again on
it. If you're worried about comments, then it's pretty much game over.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
, they had 2 months, at least, to be aware and do
something. I think this was just a courtesy, but in my case the
maintainer did answered me. In yours it might do down differently.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
, and it might not. If it does, then we could start from the
simplest solution, a simple spam filter and moderation by the
maintainer. Limiting messages should be discussed as a last resort, when
everything else didn't worked.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
to be polite and ask.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
frequent are the comments? I maintain a
few packages on AUR and I don't get that many comments. At least they
tend to be sparse enough. I wouldn't bother to moderate them myself.
Perhaps this could be configurable?
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 19-06-2015 08:43, LoneVVolf escreveu:
On 19-06-15 03:36, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu:
Should we allow such programs in AUR ?
You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR
that could also help protect criminals. Should I also
. See where your reasoning is flawed?
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
contribute to AUR.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
... not that much
I can say at this point, just wish good luck.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
. Or at least
minimize their impact.
Expecting to block something to avoid information breach, or any other
kind of data theft is dumb. Also, come on people. It's 2015. Doesn't
everybody also have a machine at home?
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
open one.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
it to yourself? Really,
your arguments are getting more and more pointless. I'm really sorry for
you that you can't access an unblocked internet.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
Em 15-06-2015 16:26, Tom Swartz escreveu:
With all due respect, requiring that a user punch holes in their security
firewalls is not a proper or long term solution to the issue at hand.
It is the only solution.
For home users, this might be a valid (although no less sane) solution, but
in
contributing to arch.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
your ssh
keys too much. Perhaps of for work and one personal will do.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini.
Cheers,
don't think
the aur devs shouldn't sweat too much to implement this.
You can, if you wish, register another user in the AUR, give that user
co-maintainer rights. A dirty way to have more than one ssh key.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
have
bigger worries than the keys used to publish some packages on AUR.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
on aur4 and that is unacceptable. Migrate a package and
then orphan it is not ideal and we will end up having the same number of
orphans as we already have.
Cheers,
Giancarlo Razzolini
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
