Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: How do I show a AUR Rebuild as a newer build?

On 22/10/2018 16.29, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: On 10/22/18 7:52 AM, LoneVVolf wrote: I think this can be solved by clarifying what upstream is. example : archlinux foo package has foo.org as upstream archlinux32 uses archlinux foo package as base , upstream = archlinux manjaro32

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: Re: How do I show a AUR Rebuild as a newer build?

On 22/10/2018 12.16, hagar wrote: Or is the answer simply: "Don't rely on package versioning for your modified packages"? Best, Tinu Unfortunately maybe something is needed as I use a local repository to serve my localnet. I build once and then install by update from my repository.

[aur-general] spammer account in aur

Check https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/indicator-bulletin-git/?comments=all It does look to me like that tyson24 account belongs to a spambot OR the email addy has been infected by spambots. Can a TU look into this ? LW

Re: [aur-general] Attempt to upload llvm35 to AUR gets rejected

On 06-04-18 08:11, Albert Graef via aur-general wrote: The llvm35 package recently got kicked from extra, but I need it for my Pure package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pure/) which in turn is needed for a bunch of other packages I maintain in the AUR. So I resurrected llvm35 from extra,

Re: [aur-general] x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu vs x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

On 05-12-17 09:27, Ralf Mardorf wrote: [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ grep CHOST /etc/makepkg.conf* /etc/makepkg.conf:CHOST="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" /etc/makepkg.conf-20130715_000209.bak:CHOST="x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" /etc/makepkg.conf.pacnew:CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" [rocketmouse@archlinux

[aur-general] add base-devel / multilib-devel group as makedepend to AUR packages ?

Hi, I do have the impression that the number of aur comments about pacakges not building unless foo is installed has gone up. Very often foo turns out to be part of base-devel or multilib-devel. Answering that is easy, by linking to main AUR wiki page that clearly states base-devel is

Re: [aur-general] Suggestion to add a pinned comment to PKGBUILDs of high risk vulnerable software

On 04-07-17 10:19, NicoHood wrote: About the original suggestion for the AUR: I think its worth to have a pinned comment on the AUR page. The package maintainer should add it if an user gives him the hint. If he doesnt accept it a TU should check if the request is valid and pin the users

Re: [aur-general] Gcc-6.3: ldd shows wrong symbols

On 28-06-17 02:56, Stefan Husmann wrote: Hello, I have put gcc63 to AUR, merely to have a working gcj implemetation, but something is wrong with it. If I compile anything with it, ldd shows that the resulting binaries have wrong symbols. For instance, ldd

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: André Silva

On 18-05-17 18:25, André Silva wrote: Otherwise, i won't maintain more packages than linux-libre{,-lts} and free firmware in Arch since i have another personal projects too. So i would just help maintain my kernels in [community] as my contribution for all users who loves use it. Andre. to

Re: [aur-general] Should "base" packages be listed as dependencies?

On 29-03-17 09:32, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: So, I didn't think such a technical question would spark so much passion! Maybe this discussion should indeed go to arch-dev-public. In the meantime, I see 4 positions emerge from the discussion: 1) packages in "base" *should* be explicitely listed as

Re: [aur-general] Fwd: AUR Package deleted: cozy

On 21-10-16 13:15, Bruno Pagani wrote: Can we have hints about why this happened? Especially, cozy-nginx, cozy-standalone and cozy-apache all redirect users to cozy package. Thanks, Bruno https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2016-October/013898.html

Re: [aur-general] My first PKGBUILD

On 13-06-16 10:41, Bennett Piater wrote: On 06/12/2016 02:26 PM, mar...@marcin.co wrote: Hi I think you should use pkgver in source url. Also, why would you copy libs to opt? License is usually named just LICENSE Is that the third package release? Or first? Thanks! I used $pkgver in the source

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD and git-lfs

On 27-05-16 23:35, Storm Dragon wrote: Howdy, It says the directory already exists and is not empty. Here's the PKGBUILD I was working on with the git clone stuff done in the prepare() function: Oh, and the command I'm using is just makepkg -s Thanks Storm In the prepare()function ,use

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD and git-lfs

On 27-05-16 09:30, Christoph Gysin wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Storm Dragon wrote: I have a PKGBUILD that requires git-lfs. It fails every time, even though, What command do you use to build? How does it fail? Christoph, check

[aur-general] AUR airvpn-portable changes files in userfolders, DO NOT INSTALL

Hi, The package airvpn-portable [1] installs files in userfolders [2] and imo should be deleted ASAP. I filed a deletion request,but felt this issue is serious enough to warn about this package. I would like to advise users to remove it from their systems immediately, but don't know if

Re: [aur-general] Dell 2155cdn driver PKGBUILD quality check

On 26-12-15 05:56, Doug Newgard wrote: On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100 Peter Tobler wrote: Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore, pacman

Re: [aur-general] RFC: PKGBUILD for tensorflow-git

On 12-11-15 10:56, Pieter ROBYNS wrote: Hi, I found out why the AUR bazel package didn't work for me: the problem was that ~/.bazelrc needs to point to %workspace%:/opt/bazel/base_workspace/ (as explained in the comments here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bazel/). So now everything works

Re: [aur-general] Package depends on 'provides' of another package

On 05-09-15 21:22, Christopher Reimer wrote: On 05.09.2015 20:15, Johannes Löthberg wrote: On 05/09, Christopher Reimer wrote: Unfortunately aurweb is unable to resolve vdr-api back to the actual vdr package. So either it's a bug in aurweb or my construct (vdr-plugin --> vdr-api - --> vdr) is

Re: [aur-general] Package depends on 'provides' of another package

On 05-09-15 13:38, Christopher Reimer wrote: So either it's a bug in aurweb or my construct (vdr-plugin --> vdr-api - --> vdr) is way to complex an there's an easier approach. Any opinions? Thanks Christopher The easiest solution is to make vdr-api a virtual package, like

Re: [aur-general] Package depends on 'provides' of another package

On 05-09-15 15:06, LoneVVolf wrote: vdr should depend on vdr-api . LW I think i got that wrong and it should be reversed : vdr-api needs to depend on vdr . LW

Re: [aur-general] Disowning packages

On 03-08-15 13:42, Armin K. wrote: On 3.8.2015 13:38, Armin K. wrote: Hi, Anyone interested in some (all) of my packages? I don't have the time to maintain them anymore. broadcom-wl mesa-git lib32-mesa-git llvm-svn lib32-llvm-svn libclc-svn libgxim imsettings im-chooser

Re: [aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

On 19-06-15 03:36, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: Em 18-06-2015 19:27, LoneVVolf escreveu: Should we allow such programs in AUR ? You're mistaking a tool for its uses. I have some packages on the AUR that could also help protect criminals. Should I also remove these packages from AUR? Let's ban

[aur-general] password cracker program in AUR

Hi, While browsing AUR4 orphaned pacakges, i noticed cudahashcat with description Worlds fastest password cracker with dictionary mutation engine . There are atleast 2 more packages from the same upstream, http://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ . I realise it and can be useful for people that

Re: [aur-general] Git over HTTPS

On 17-06-15 14:17, Tom Swartz wrote: Asking for a response from the OP: Do you not have other network access available to maintain your AUR packages? More to the point, are you maintaining packages on AUR as part of your official responsibilities? Or just in spare time? Leaving aside, for the

Re: [aur-general] How the Popularity value is being calculated for a package in the AUR4?

On 12-06-15 10:01, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Also, we don't care about packages that were very popular a year ago and are no longer used today. Low number of new votes != not used anymore Many high quality, useful packages target a specific group of users. Does that make them less valuable ? LVV

Re: [aur-general] How to install wine packages the require drive_c system wide?

On 09-06-15 21:56, Storm Dragon wrote: Hi, I am thinking of packaging some audio games. The problem is, they will require a sapi5 voice to work. I can create a package for that too, except I think it requires something like c:\System32. Is there a way to do this system wide instead of using

Re: [aur-general] How to package packages with *-common?

On 13-04-15 12:12, Konstantin P. wrote: I have a program with one gsettings schema and 2 binaries. Schema required for both, but binaries does not require each other. How packaging tech will be best? Assuming you want to be able to install the binaries separately, i'd use a split package with

Re: [aur-general] Renaming 'chromium-browser-bin' and 'chromium-nightly'

On 01-04-15 07:41, Det wrote: My personal pool of suggestions is as follows: - chromium-continuous - chromium-continuous-bin - chromium-nightly - chromium-nightly-bin (only 3 packages follow this scheme [5]) - chromium-snapshot - chromium-snapshot-bin I would preferer omitting the '-bin', but

Re: [aur-general] Conflicting contents of different packages

On 02-03-15 10:54, Florian Bruhin wrote: * gt notf...@gmx.com [2015-03-02 15:11:45 +0530]: Hi guys, I maintain a package dex-editor-git in the AUR. It was recently reported to me that it conflicts with a package named dex present in the community repository.

Re: [aur-general] Can't update my own PKGBUILD, where to find errors?

On 23-01-15 00:23, Lukas Fleischer wrote: Let me elaborate just a bit: There currently isn't a bcusdk package base in the AUR, so a new package base is created upon package submission. That new package base contains a package eibd which is already part of the package base eibd, though. Since a

Re: [aur-general] Should we recommend removing comments from the AUR?

On 02-12-14 07:07, Nowaker wrote: A custom field in PKGBUILD that AUR will understand would really come in handy. Something like this: pkgissues='https://github.com/Nowaker/aur-packages/issues' p input type=submit value=Add Comment nbsp;nbsp; If you can't build the package, or the package is

Re: [aur-general] AUR request mentality

Perhaps we could treat the aur-requests more like a bug tracker ? a possible flow : request is filed and gets unassigned status TUs review unassigned requests If they feel they are right person to handle it, they assign it to themselves. request status changes to assigned, and the TU is now

Re: [aur-general] Announcement Input

On 25-07-14 18:20, Christian Hesse wrote: Exactly. Probably 'sticky comment' is a better name for what I want. I would also like to have the option fro sticky comments. example : I maintain cndrvcups-lb package, but there's also a cndrvcups-lb-bin package. For some users my package works

Re: [aur-general] Snowballz

On 26-06-14 03:42, Storm Dragon wrote: Hi, the package snowballz is out of date and doesn't seem to have a maintainer. The problems with the PKGBUILD are minor, just package names need updating. I would be willing to take on this package if no one else wants it. thing is, I can fix the

[aur-general] remove request xf86-video-intel-dri3-git

Hi, Please remove my xf86-video-intel-dri-git [1] . The functionality provided by this out-of-tree build has been merged to master. For those needing it, install xf86-video-intel-git instead. LW [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-video-intel-dri3-git/

Re: [aur-general] Package naming where sources are not official

On 27-03-14 10:24, David Phillips wrote: Hi all, I adopted https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trayfreq/ a while ago to nurture it back into health after seeing that it was trying to use outdated files in /proc/ amongst other fatal bugs. The owners haven't updated their sourceforge in a while

[aur-general] delete request canon-cndrvcups

Hi, please delete canon-cndrvcups package [1] . It's an orphan, outdated and not used by any other package afaict. Lone_Wolf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/canon-cndrvcups/

[aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700

Hi, please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1]. reasons : orphan last updated in dec 2011 flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013 There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2], Lordheavy's unofficial mesa-git repo [3] and my own mesa-r300-r600-radeonsi-git

Re: [aur-general] Request for replacing canon-ufr to cndrvcups-lb-bin

Hi, I am the maintainer of the cndrvcups-lb package. First, I apologise for breaking the thread but i had aur-general mailing options set to digest, so can't reply in thread (changed to single now). After I found out Allen Choong had uploaded the package canon-ufr and this provided the