Re: [aur-general] Looking for a TU to get gamemode into community repo

On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 09:46 +0200, Minze Zwerver via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > > I am the current maintainer of the gamemode AUR, > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gamemode/ ,and I would like to > submit > it for the community repository. > > Currently it has libinih among its

Re: [aur-general] TU resignation - Lukas Jirkovsky (stativ)

On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky via aur-general wrote: > Hello everyone, > > after much time I've finally came to admit to myself that I can no > longer fulfill my duties as a trusted user the way Arch Linux > deserves. > While I still manage to update the packages I actively

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

January 10, 2017 10:31 PM, "Bruno Pagani via aur-general" <aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > Le 08/01/2017 à 19:19, Maxime Gauduin a écrit : > >> You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise >> against the default >&

Re: [aur-general] TU Application: Bruno Pagani

Hi Bruno, Nice to see a fellow beets lover apply! Your PKGBUILDs look nice and tidy, you'll most likely fit right in :) You piqued my interest with bs1770gain, any idea how it fares speed-wise against the default gstreamer backend? I kept using wine + foobar2000 to compute my replaygain

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Voting period is over, looks like your application was accepted. Congratulations and welcome to the team! You will find the TODO list for new TUs on the wiki [1]. I just gave you TU status on AUR and will take care of filing a bug report to get

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

The discussion period is now over, please cast your votes over on AUR. Cheers, September 3 2016 9:19 PM, "Maxime Gauduin" <aluc...@archlinux.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, > > I confirm my sponsorship of this g

Re: [aur-general] TU Application NicoHood

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, I confirm my sponsorship of this guy. @Doug: I agree that lying about this is unacceptable, I believe Nico got the message and won't suggest anything like this again. That said, let the discussion period continue. Cheers, - -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] question about community packages vs aur

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Johnathan Jenkins wrote: > It seems the anonymous-pro font is now available in the community repos > (has > been for sometime actually). > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/ttf-anonymous-pro/ > > And I have the package >

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 12:15:01 -0300 Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io wrote: Why not just name them the same locally? source_i686=($pkgname-$pkgver:: http://example.com/release-${pkgver}-i386.tar.gz;)

Re: [aur-general] [AUR4] Single binary package for different architectures

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:46 PM, Bruno Pagani bruno.pag...@ens-lyon.org wrote: Le 14/06/2015 16:31, Johannes Löthberg a écrit : On 14/06, Johannes Löthberg wrote: On 14/06, Reventlov wrote: In which way is it cleaner and more structured? It's a bash hack instead of actually using

Re: [aur-general] Arch Linux Trusted User application Christian Hesse

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Christian Hesse l...@eworm.de wrote: Ike Devolder ike.devol...@gmail.com on Wed, 2015/01/14 09:27: On behalf of Bartłomiej: Congratulations Eworm, you got accepted as TU. 28 yes and 3 no votes makes that you are welcome to the team :). Christian, I

Re: [aur-general] Trusted User application

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote: On 05.01.2015 17:52, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On 31.12.2014 21:29, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: On December 31, 2014 7:20:02 PM CET, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: [reposted to the correct list, oops]

Re: [aur-general] Rbspeex PKGBUILD Continued

On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Storm Dragon stormdragon2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Err... I forgot to attach the PKGBUILD... lol Storm -- Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465: https

Re: [aur-general] ArchLinux TU Application: Fabio Castelli (Muflone)

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote: 2014. 07. 31, csütörtök keltezéssel 01.06-kor Muflone ezt írta: Hi everyone My name's Fabio Castelli (aka Muflone) from Italy and I wish to apply to become a TU for ArchLinux to maintain some packages in the

Re: [aur-general] merge request

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lensfun-svn - lensfun-git

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge lensfun-svn [1] into lensfun-git. The project has moved to git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-svn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lensfun-git/ Merged, thx. --

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/ Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting that it be deleted:

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:02 AM, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: Oh, so Wakka was abandoned. I had assumed it was still running. I might have a look at forking Wakka or something... anyway, that's outside the scope of this thread, I'm no longer opposing deletion. On 14/06/2014,

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:16 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta- requirements/ the module it provides is now in core perl -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] More Perl Delete request

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-io-socket-ip/ the module it provides is now provided in core_perl -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] Package Deletion

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-cpan-meta-yaml the module it provides is provided as a CORE Perl module now. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:21 AM, John D Jones III unixgeek1...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-parse-cpan-meta/ the module it provides is now part of CORE perl. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: cmusfm - cmusfm-git

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:35 PM, ok...@archlinux.info wrote: Please merge cmusfm into cmusfm-git. Thanks, OK100 Why would you want to proceed with that merge? There are stable releases of cmusfm, it just needs to be updated to 0.2.0. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Disown request + Delete request

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Rafael Ferreira rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there. lib32-libwbclient[1] and lib32-smbclient[2] are out-of-date for sometime now, some users commented that and also flagged them, and after I sent an email one week ago, the maintainer didn't reply nor

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: lib32-libwbclient-old - lib32-libwbclient

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rafael Ferreira rafael.f...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there. I uploaded a split PKGBUILD providing lib32-smbclient and lib32-libwbclient [1]. In order to succeed, I had to rename lib32-libwbclient to lib32-libwbclient-old [2] before uploading the split PKGBUILD.

Re: [aur-general] Remove package: rosinstall_generator

On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Ralf Mardorf info.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:57 +0200, Benjamin Chrétien wrote: Could you please remove the newly created rosinstall_generator package? This was a mistake while updating several packages, the real one being

Re: [aur-general] AUR merge request

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Xinkai yeled.n...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I own two AUR packages xware_desktop and xware_desktop-git. xware-desktop is the new name I want to use. I want to replace the underscore with dash, and I find -git package doesn't suit in my case. I already uploaded

Re: [aur-general] Redundant package for deletion

On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: Tintwizard is provided by the Arch package 'tint2' [1], so this separate package [2] is now redundant and can be removed. Thanks, Steven. [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=tint2 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main repositories: Busybox: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox-static/ https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/busybox/ Wine

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request: l3afpad

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: The AUR package l3afpad is in need of an update as the source file has changed URL and it will soon stop working when the author takes his old page down. I'm willing to take over as maintainer for this package if

Re: [aur-general] Another two for deletion!

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Steven Honeyman stevenhoney...@gmail.com wrote: These AUR packages are duplicates of packages alreadu in the main repositories: Busybox: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/busybox

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request

On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Justin Dray jus...@dray.be wrote: Please remove the following pkgbuild: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-evtouch/ Upstream is dead, package hasn't been able to be built in *years* and the maintainer has said as much on the package comments, and

Re: [aur-general] Package Delete requests.

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please delete my pypy3-* packages. They were there only because the old AUR recognized the last pkgname in the array as the package name and they were always provided by their pypy-* counterpart. Yichao Yu [1]

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: python2-ethumb

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.info wrote: Python bindings for ethumb were finally merged into the python-efl tree. This package has no more reason to exist. Nothing worth merging, so it just needs deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb/

Re: [aur-general] Delete/merge request

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου ntheo1...@gmail.com wrote: Hello. Could you please delete (or merge) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins/ , so I can update the split

Re: [aur-general] Merge gvim-python with gvim-python3 in [extra]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Allen Li cyberdup...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm the maintainer for gvim-python. Can someone merge/delete it as there is now a package in [extra], gvim-python3? Thanks! [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gvim-python/ [2]:

Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.comwrote: Hi Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]? It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2]. Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release. Thank you [1]

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: On May 17, 2014 6:29 PM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: Maxime, I sent him an email on May 3rd, so it's been two weeks. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ejtagproxy-svn Just an FYI,

Re: [aur-general] Merge request python2-pycha

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Stefan Husmann stefan-husm...@t-online.de wrote: Hello, please merge python2-pycha into python2-pycha-hg. The PKGBUILD pulls from a mercurial repo at bitbucket and therefore should be named accordingly. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycha/

Re: [aur-general] 0ad merge?

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Taylor Lookabaugh jesus.christ.i.l...@gmail.com wrote: I've noticed that both 0ad-git[0] and 0ad-svn[1] use the same source(github repository). I have CC'ed both maintainers to this mail. Could both parties work out a solution and then merge the packages?

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi TUs, Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now. Thanks, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for skype-mid

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak m...@ava1ar.infowrote: Please remove skype-mid package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype-mid/ Long time ago it was separate experimental version of skype for MID devices, but it is orphaned by Skype for a long time and is not

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request for package ejtagproxy-svn

On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 4:33 AM, David Manouchehri d...@32t.ca wrote: I sent Paul (paulburton89) an updated PKGBUILD for ejtagproxy-svn with a proper pkgver on May 3rd (at the moment it fails to build the newest version without manual intervention). I haven't heard back from him or seen the

Re: [aur-general] Merge/delete requests

On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.comwrote: Merge requests https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure-bzr/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aafigure/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4-bzr/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/a4/ Doesn't build. No

Re: [aur-general] Please disown faustworks and faust-lv2

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Rob Til Freedmen rob.til.freed...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faustworks/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-05-05) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/faust-lv2/ Flagged out-of-date (2013-11-12) Outdated by two releases, look at the

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.infowrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra]. Done, thx -- Maxime

[aur-general] Fwd: firefox-stable deleted

Forwarding this to AUR General so that the world can see how nice a guy you are. Insults, racism, what else have you got in store? I've taken the liberty to suspend your AUR account, because, yeah, us higher ranks motherfuckers can do that. Now please reflect upon your behavior and realize what an

Re: [aur-general] Merge Request

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Rick runn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The packages are still no merged, can review it. Thanks. El 07/05/2014 23:49, Xyne x...@archlinux.ca escribió: On 2014-05-07 23:15 +0200 Rick wrote: Hi, Can I please get [1] 'dkms-8192cu

Re: [aur-general] Disownment request: eclipse-aptana

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Miodrag Tokić m...@loonies.io wrote: Hi, I would like to request disownment of the package eclipse-aptana [1] with intetion of taking over maintenance. Current maintainer did not respond to flagging the package out of date since 2013-07-22 and is not

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Lara Maia laramaia...@gmail.com wrote: Delete xdg-settings [1]. The package is not usefull anymore, this is now provided by xdg-utils. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xdg-settings/ -- ~ *Lara* ~ Gone, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: django-dajax*

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice-git-python2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajax-git-python2/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/django-dajaxice/

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: phpredis/php-redis

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-redis/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/phpredis/ One needs to be merged into the other. I don't know which into which as I don't deal with php packages. J. Leclanche

Re: [aur-general] Disown request: alsamixer-qt4

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: Disregard the previous message. Please instead merge the package into qastools: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qastools/ J. Leclanche On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gns3-unofficial

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove gns3-unofficial. It was beta/rc channel for gns3. There is no beta/rc now, and won't be for a long time. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gns3-unofficial/ -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: libgcj12, libgcj13

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj12/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj13/ Merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libgcj/ J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Remove linux-lts310

On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Alan Orth alan.o...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Please remove linux-lts310. I had created it last year sometime before noticing that [core] had switched linux-lts to 3.10.x. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-lts310 Thanks, -- Alan Orth

Re: [aur-general] Deletion request: openspades-data

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Shohei Kusakata sho...@kusakata.com wrote: Hello, Please delete this package: openspades-data https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades-data/ because I intergrated the package into openspades (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openspades/). Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: lxqt-power-git

On Tue, 2014-04-01 at 05:43 +0100, Jerome Leclanche wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-power-git/ Can safely delete or merge into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lxqt-powermanagement-git/ - functionality has been merged into the one app. J. Leclanche Merged, thx. --

Re: [aur-general] [Rename Request] bitcoind to bitcoin-core

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: I think bitcoin-core is more descriptive than bitcoind. The package provides a headless P2P node without wallet functionality (core). A growing number of Bitcoin server applications depend on Bitcoin core running as a

Re: [aur-general] [Merge Request] trayfreq - trayfreq-archlinux

On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 16:02 +1300, David Phillips wrote: I hate to look like I'm being pushy, but I'd just like to kindly bump this request as I've seen numerous other merges occur since I requested this one :) Cheers! On 28/03/2014, David Phillips dbphillip...@gmail.com wrote: I

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fontmatrix-svn

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontmatrix-svn/ - they are available on github.com/fontmatrix/fontmatrix now. J. Leclanche I've submitted a fixed/updated fontmatrix-git and merged fontmatrix-svn into it.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gnome-terminal-dark

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Gary van der Merwe gary...@gmail.comwrote: Please delete gnome-terminal-dark. There is now a preference to do this. Done, please include a link next time. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xf86-input-synaptics-jumpycursor/ No longer needed (cf comments) J. Leclanche Deleted, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [compiz] Merge request

On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Florian Dejonckheere flor...@floriandejonckheere.be wrote: Hi Please merge compiz [1] into compiz-core [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-core/ Thanks Florian Merged, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] pkg deletion request

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:54 AM, flower_of_l...@gmx.net flower_of_l...@gmx.net wrote: Hello AUR maintainers, I would like to get the following packages removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/colord-eudev/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cups-eudev/

Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: asus-screen-brightness

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/asus-screen-brightness/ - The entirety code is stored in the source package - It's just a bash file and a system service file (which is not useful) - xorg-xbacklight provides the

Re: [aur-general] Compiz 0.9 packages cleanup, mergers?

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: There are a great deal of orphaned Compiz 0.9 packages in the AUR, some for the stable releases and some for bazaar. They are all on around 0.9.5 or 0.9.7. These are the packages I'm referring to: for stable release:

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: qtermwidget - qtermwidget-git

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qtermwidget-git/ Former has had no releases in a while and is no longer on sourceforge. Only available on git currently. J.

Re: [aur-general] [luakit-gtk3-git] Deletion request

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:14 PM, tuftedoce...@fastmail.fm wrote: I forked this from upstream, but no longer have the time/knowledge to continue and I've abandoned further work on it. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luakit-gtk3-git/ Deleted, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: qterminal-suite-git

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/qterminal-suite-git/ No longer exists. Can merge with qterminal-git really. J. Leclanche Merged, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests: php-zendopcache etc.

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Yardena Cohen yarden...@gmail.com wrote: These all do the same thing, and the functionality was merged into extra/php last year: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendopcache https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-zendoptimizerplus

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote: The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote: Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps Removed, please include a link to the package next time. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years,

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: please merge danbooru-git into danbooru-client-git

On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:09 AM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: hi please merge: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-git/ into https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/danbooru-client-git/ package orphan and don't have a real name greetings Merged, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] Merge request

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:06 PM, G. Schlisio g.schli...@dukun.de wrote: please merge [0] into [1], as it is a python2 package and thus does not follow the naming scheme. both are orphan, while i just created [1] and disowned it. thanks [0]

Re: [aur-general] delete request mesa-r600-r700

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:54 PM, LoneVVolf lonew...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, please delete mesa-r600-r700-git package [1]. reasons : orphan last updated in dec 2011 flagged out-of-date since june 10, 2013 There are several maintained alternatives, like aur mesa-git package [2],

Re: [aur-general] Disown requests

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:18 PM, carstene1ns a...@carsten-teibes.de wrote: Hello, please disown ta3d[1], libclaw[2] and plee-the-bear[3]. I contacted maintainer darkbaboon with a patch for ta3d (2014-01-19) and received no response. The other two packages are out of date and can be updated

Re: [aur-general] Request remove: openhevc

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:30 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: Hi ppl please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openhevc/ i've upload package with wrong name (is openhevc-git, now uploaded) greetings Deleted, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] [Orphanage Request] electrum-server-git

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: Requesting orphanage of electrum-server-githttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-server-git ; the maintainer of this package has not been responsive to inquiries. I have an updated PKGBUILD prepared:

Re: [aur-general] Package removal request

On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Simon Lipp sloonz+...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python3-imaging/ Upstream (myself) abandoned the project in favor of python-pillow which is already in community. Regards, Simon Lipp Deleted, thx. --

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki srki...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston Deleted, thx. --

Re: [aur-general] Delete proposal: amsn-*

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:04 +1100, Phillip Smith wrote: On 3 March 2014 10:46, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.com wrote: The amsn2-git package is, itself, orphaned, and the last development on the amsn2-git repo appears to be almost 3 years ago. Does it still build? The

Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hi, there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages. dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]: Gadgets are also in the normal packages, upstream switched to git, should be merged into dzen2-git[2]. dzen2-parallel[3]: Old and weird pkgbuild,

Re: [aur-general] Rename request; {python-,}pyprof2calltree

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:55 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Evgeniy Alekseev darkarca...@mail.ru [2014-03-01 14:14:09 +0400]: On Thursday 27 February 2014 06:19:05 Florian Bruhin wrote: I just picked up python-pyprof2calltree[1] which was orphaned. Since it's a tool and not a library, it

Re: [aur-general] dzen2-* cleanup

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 09:51 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: * Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com [2014-03-03 09:32:02 +0100]: On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 07:17 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote: Hi, there's a bit of a chaos with dzen2-* packages. dzen2-gadgets-svn[1]: Gadgets are also

Re: [aur-general] Merge request: Various VCS-packages

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Rikard Falkeborn rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com wrote: Please merge the following VCS packages. Reason? Upstream switched to git. doxygen-svn [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-svn/] into doxygen-git [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/doxygen-git/]

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fluidr3

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.orgwrote: On 23 February 2014 05:02, Maxime Gauduin aluc...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fluidr3/ Appears

Re: [aur-general] deletion request: pylint-python3

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Please delete pylint-python3 [1]. It is out of date, incorrectly named and a duplicate of python-pylint [2]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pylint-python3/ [2]

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Ismael Bouya ismael.bo...@normalesup.orgwrote: Hi, I'm maintaining a package in the AUR whose source is arch-depending (anaconda) For the moment I deal with that by putting the x86_64 version in the source/md5 array and adding a if [ $CARCH == i686 ]

Re: [aur-general] Package with arch-depending source

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Ismael Bouya ismael.bo...@normalesup.orgwrote: (Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:46:48AM +0100) Maxime Gauduin : Yes it is, see the nvidia package for instance: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/nvidia Of course

Re: [aur-general] (bump) Deletion/Rename request: pebble-sdk{-beta}

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Florian Bruhin m...@the-compiler.orgwrote: * Florian Bruhin m...@the-compiler.org [2014-02-13 11:27:38 +0100]: I'm the current maintainer of the pebble-sdk-beta[1] package. This now got final, so it should be renamed to pebble-sdk, replacing the current

Re: [aur-general] delete libusbx packages

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:51 AM, xantares 09 xantare...@hotmail.comwrote: The following packages have been replaced by their libusb equivalent (like in the main repo see https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/libusb/) and are useless now since libusbx has been merged back to libusb:

Re: [aur-general] Orphan request - gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Izumi Natsuka izumi.nats...@hotmail.comwrote: Hello, The package, gtk-theme-ambiance-crunchy has been flagged out-of-date since 2013-07-26 and I try to email the maintainer, seems that his/her email has been unavailable, so I request to orphan the package:

Re: [aur-general] delete libftdi1

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:15 PM, xantares 09 xantare...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, This package has been rendered useless as the same features have been added to the libftdi package from main repo: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libftdi1/ See bug report below. To: b...@archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Many vidyo packages

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Fernando G. Monticelli fernando.montice...@cern.ch wrote: Hi all, I wrote an updated PKGBUID of for the vidyo package in AUR ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vidyo/) and found that there are two orphans (vidyo-desktop and vidyo-desktop2) which are

Re: [aur-general] Many vidyo packages

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Fernando G. Monticelli fernando.montice...@cern.ch wrote: Hi Maxime, Thanks a lot for the super-fast response! I see the duplicates are gone!. I actually wrote intrepid a mail and I got an immediate reply. He will look at my proposed PKGBUILD and update

Re: [aur-general] request remove vapoursynth-plugins-ffms2

On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:26 PM, SpinFlo sl1pk...@gmail.com wrote: please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vapoursynth-plugin-ffms2/ no need because the symlink is include in ffms2 [community] package greetings And done, thx. -- Maxime

Re: [aur-general] feed the beast

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Justin Dray jus...@dray.be wrote: Hey everyone, [1] has been out of date for many years and provided the same application as [2]. Please merge [1] in to [2]. Please merge [3] in to [4] as I have renamed the package to be more accurate. [1]

  1   2   3   4   5   >