[PRQ#51861] Deletion Request for talosctl Accepted

Request #51861 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for talosctl. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#51860] Deletion Request for talhelper Accepted

Request #51860 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for talhelper. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#51861] Deletion Request for talosctl

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for talosctl [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining. :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/talosctl/

[PRQ#51860] Deletion Request for talhelper

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for talhelper [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining. :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/talhelper/

[PRQ#51592] Deletion Request for flux Accepted

Request #51592 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for flux. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#50943] Deletion Request for flux-menu Accepted

Request #50943 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for flux-menu. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#51734] Deletion Request for go-task Accepted

Request #51734 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for go-task. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#51859] Deletion Request for kt6

Genues [1] filed a deletion request for kt6 [2]: Rename to kt6-bin later [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Genues/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kt6/

[PRQ#51858] Deletion Request for mit8_30

Genues [1] filed a deletion request for mit8_30 [2]: Rename to mit8_30-bin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Genues/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mit8_30/

[PRQ#51857] Deletion Request for mit8

Genues [1] filed a request to merge mit8 [2] into mit8 [3]: Rename to mit8-bin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Genues/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mit8/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mit8/

[PRQ#51856] Orphan Request for nodejs-google-clasp Accepted

Request #51856 has been Accepted by mundo03 [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mundo03/

[PRQ#51856] Orphan Request for nodejs-google-clasp

mundo03 [1] filed an orphan request for nodejs-google-clasp [2]: There has been no update for a few years [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mundo03/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nodejs-google-clasp/

[PRQ#51855] Merge Request for jan-electron-bin

zxp19821005 [1] filed a request to merge jan-electron-bin [2] into jan-bin [3]: The upstream has changed the package name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zxp19821005/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jan-electron-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jan-bin/

[PRQ#51854] Deletion Request for jc303 Accepted

Request #51854 has been Accepted by grawlinson [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for jc303. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/

[PRQ#51854] Deletion Request for jc303

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for jc303 [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining. :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jc303/

[PRQ#51853] Deletion Request for gnome-shell-extension-pop-shell-bin

yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for gnome-shell-extension- pop-shell-bin [2]: Not maintained since 2021 and has been useless probably since GNOME 42 was released. A binary GNOME shell extension package makes no sense to begin with, anyway. [1]

[PRQ#51852] Deletion Request for python-md-toc

RavuAlHemio [1] filed a deletion request for python-md-toc [2]: duplicate of python-md_toc [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RavuAlHemio/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-md-toc/

[PRQ#51852] Deletion Request for python-md-toc Accepted

Request #51852 has been Accepted by RavuAlHemio [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for python-md-toc. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RavuAlHemio/

[PRQ#51851] Orphan Request for openmodelica-dev-omc Accepted

Request #51851 has been Accepted by MarsSeed [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/

[PRQ#51851] Orphan Request for openmodelica-dev-omc

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for openmodelica-dev-omc [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2019-09-13). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openmodelica-dev-omc/

[PRQ#51850] Orphan Request for gpsd-timing Accepted

Request #51850 has been Accepted by MarsSeed [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/

[PRQ#51850] Orphan Request for gpsd-timing

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for gpsd-timing [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2021-02-07). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gpsd-timing/

[PRQ#51849] Orphan Request for freerdp-gstfree Accepted

Request #51849 has been Accepted by MarsSeed [1]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/

[PRQ#51849] Orphan Request for freerdp-gstfree

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for freerdp-gstfree [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2023-03-10). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/freerdp-gstfree/

Re: [PRQ#45094] Deletion Request for ros-noetic-ros-controllers

It seems the previous email is not delivered. Again, I think I create this request by mistake. I should request to co-maintain the package and its dependencies. Please ignore this request. On 7/19/23 23:52, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: daizhirui [1] filed a deletion request for

Re: [PRQ#44789] Orphan Request for crystalline

No, sorry, I've not noticed your activity (comments and issues) before this request, my bad. I do not want to. But I guessed somebody could notice and pick it up. If you're still giving a little time to this — I'm glad and thankful. And, again, sorry for this inattentive request. On Wed, Jul

Re: [PRQ#45094] Deletion Request for ros-noetic-ros-controllers

Sorry, I create this request by mistake. But please update the ros-noetic-ros-controllers and its dependencies. Thank you! On 7/19/23 23:52, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: daizhirui [1] filed a deletion request for ros-noetic-ros-controllers [2]: This package is not maintained by the

Re: [PRQ#44789] Orphan Request for crystalline

Hi, Do you want to be the new maintainer? I'm still maintain it, but in a low effort way... this is why I didn't solved the compilation problem it has since 0.7.0. If you want to be the new maintainer, just tell me the steps I need to do. Thanks, Hugo Parente Lima On Mon, Jul 17 2023 at

Re: [PRQ#45008] Deletion Request for gitgud-git

Fair critique, though I am a fan of childish amusement. I had hope that the repo maintainer would be more active, but as it stands it is best to remove the package (especially with how it will break due to argparse, if that hasn't already occured). I.e. as the creator and maintainer I support

Re: [PRQ#45013] Deletion Request for python-catkin_pkg

Sorry for the delay in responding to your comment, I have updated the package. On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 05:27, wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-catkin_pkg [2]: > > Unmaintained package: > I requested a packaging fix on 2022-07-10, but owner did not respond > in any way.

Re: [PRQ#44925] Merge Request for eww-wayland

I have no issue with this. I'm new enough to arch that I don't even know what a "split package" is. -- Aleksander Heintz --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, July 18th, 2023 at 02:42, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > eclairevoyant [1] filed a request to merge eww-wayland [2] into

Re: [PRQ#44897] Orphan Request for libglibutil

Hey, Sorry I seem to have been mistaken. I checked it via the online tool and it didn’t show a build process but then I downloaded it manually again and it popped up. Sorry for this request. Have a good day, Stetsed On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 21:21, Danct12 - danct12 at disroot.org

Re: [PRQ#44897] Orphan Request for libglibutil

Hi. This package is used for waydroid, which depends on python-gbinder, then libgbinder and finally libglibutil. I must have missed that outdated message (being busy with other stuff and then the other emails get on top of each other,..). The package is now updated. Can you please be exact on

Re: [PRQ#44852] Deletion Request for leap-motion

Agreed, The package is an unmaintainable pile of junk and the hardware is abandonware/ junk at this point. TU's feel free to delete the leap-motion packages. On Monday, 17 July 2023 4:42:54 PM CAT not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for leap-motion [2]: > >

Re: [PRQ#45470] Deletion Request for i3-workspace-names-daemon-git

Hi vikryk please take a look at the issues of both projects, cboddy have been completely offline in the past years the git version is a community version with more features and a test suite, the test suite have been written before the merge of the new features please open issues or email me if

Re: [PRQ#45587] Orphan Request for mingw-w64-asio

Jul 29, 2023 20:09:43 not...@aur.archlinux.org: > MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for mingw-w64-asio [2]: > > Flagged out-of-date (2021-10-24). > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mingw-w64-asio/ Just logged in but couldn't find the

Re: [PRQ#45550] Deletion Request for prometheus-snmp-exporter Rejected

Hi, This rule is written somewhere? Why [1] and [2] exists without prefix, in this case? [1] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/nginx-prometheus-exporter/ [2] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/gitlab-exporter/ Thanks, k Sent from my iPhone > On 29 Jul 2023, at 12:32,

Re: [PRQ#45446] Merge Request for phonopy Accepted

This should have been merged in the reverse direction, as this Python module is a CLI application as well. See my much earlier request PRQ#43381, as well as @muflone's response to same maintainer, @yuhldr in a similar request, PRQ#42326 (python-dynaphopy). On 28 July 2023 15:12:47 GMT+02:00,

Re: [PRQ#45414] Deletion Request for freedv

Yeah, you're totally right. I will close my deletion request! On 7/27/23 16:55, Marcell Meszaros wrote: I recommend an AUR package merge instead of deletion, to transfer the votes and comments to the maintained newer package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freedv-gui I have created that

Re: [PRQ#45311] Orphan Request for tar-parallel

Hi, Frankly I doubt this is still useful. If there’s a desire for this to be updated I’ll happily put the work in to bump it. Thanks On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:35, <[not...@aur.archlinux.org](mailto:On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 07:35, < wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for

Re: [PRQ#45164] Merge Request for tube-converter

I have created an issue with parabolic https://github.com/NickvisionApps/Parabolic/issues/465#issuecomment-1645174983 Hopefully it will be addressed soon. Archisman On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 3:07 AM Marcell Meszaros wrote: > I guess the package with the old name will keep being recreated unless

Re: [PRQ#42399] Deletion Request for avogadro2

Hello What pkg would you like to remain? Usually, the avogadro2 is the usual name, I am delighted to add you as co-maintainer, if you stick on avogadroapp, could you add me and BioArchLinuxBot as co-maintainers? I can help maintain and auto-update the pkgver as soon as possible when the

Re: [PRQ#45142] Deletion Request for quick-n-easy-web-builder-10-bin

Though package owner has fixed the issues, this package is superfluous. As maintainer's other AUR package, quick-n-easy-web-builder-10, is also created from a precompiled release. And as per AUR guidelines, -bin suffix is not needed for this application, as it seems no source code is

Re: [PRQ#46048] Merge Request for zig-static

I’m happy for my package to be merged into yours. Your PKGBUILD seems better than mine and I haven’t been updating my package recently. Thanks for maintaining a nice version of this package! On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 12:40 PM wrote: > eNV25 [1] filed a request to merge zig-static [2] into zig-bin

Re: [PRQ#44896] Deletion Request for lib32-swh-plugins

LADPSA plugins are usable by ALSA (see https://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-doc/alsa-lib/pcm_plugins.html) so this package is useful as long as lib32-alsa-lib exists. On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 14:26 wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-swh-plugins [2]: > > There is no bin32 media

Re: [PRQ#46166] Deletion Request for gnuradio-maint38-git

Hi I am not sure that is fair as such, people could be using it for legacy oot modules, and there is someone trying it out at least two weeks ago, see https://github.com/gnuradio/gnuradio/issues/6762 I must admit, that I have not touched it in a while. Nick On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 at 01:35,

Re: [PRQ#46142] Deletion Request for zfs-dkms-helper

This is a meta package I created to prevent future mainline linux updates breaking zfs-dkms packages. zfs-dkms is closely tied to linux kernel versions and has a compatibility layer to add specific support for each major linux kernel release (e.g. "6.x"). So zfs-dkms has long been worried about

Re: [PRQ#45322] Merge Request for calckey

Hi, I'm wondering why this request isn't merged yet as calckey-beta got already merged. Best regards Björn

Re: [PRQ#46022] Deletion Request for octave40

I totally forgot about that one. Agreed, it's way outdated, please go ahead and nuke it. On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 8:51 PM wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for octave40 [2]: > > Broken old version from 2018 of repo's octave. > Misses dependencies. > Nothing depends on this one, so

Fwd: [PRQ#45826] Orphan Request for ocelotgui

Hi, This is not an orphan. Marcell Meszaros, username = MarsSeed, is (I think) making this request because somebody called it obsolete. In fact, though, the product is being updated as one can see from the github log. Perhaps I (as updater) am at fault for not giving it the right label, in

Re: [PRQ#45699] Merge Request for archey3-git

A fork is a fork. It does not mean it has been superseded. https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Archey3 Archey3 is on the wiki, not Archey4. You have already mentioned Archey4 on the Archey3 AUR page, one year ago. And you spammed yesterday the Archey3 AUR page, by flagging it out-of-date while

Re: [PRQ#45664] Deletion Request for python2-pyo

OK, thanks, let's wait and see what happens, then. :-) Matthieu Le 31.07.23 à 14:49, Marcell Meszaros a écrit : Hi Mathieu, Thank you for your response. Only an AUR Trusted User or Developer user can delete packages here, so there's nothing for you to do apart from what you already did by

Re: [PRQ#45623] Merge Request for spectre-meltdown-checker-pt-br

This merge request makes no sense, as the translation patch has to be updated as upstream sends new commits. Upstream doesn't support translations, so I hope the packages don't get merged. On Jul 30 2023, at 12:52 pm, Mark Wagie wrote: > > Actually, it would be better to submit an upstream Pull

Re: [PRQ#45664] Deletion Request for python2-pyo

I'm the maintainer of the package. It's true that I did not maintain this package properly lately. Also, maintaining such a package for python2 makes less and less sense. I agree to delete it, only I'm not sure how I'm supposed to do this... Cheers, Matthieu Le 31.07.23 à 14:26,

Re: [PRQ#43571] Deletion Request for vmdebootstrap Accepted

Marcell, thanks for the links, that looks great :) Best, Andreas On Aug 20 23, Marcell Meszaros wrote: > Andreas, you could also fork vmdebootsrap-pureos PKGBUILD to depend on repo's > debootstrap instead of the AUR package 'debootstrap-pureos'. > > The current vmdebootsrap-pureos is patched

Re: [PRQ#46488] Deletion Request for python-nipype

Run it without testing. Tests are on by default to allow the user to see areas that might cause issues since it interacts with many different programs during the testing process. It has been building within the last two years but requires the user to inspect any failing tests before deciding

Re: [PRQ#46479] Deletion Request for exoscale-cli

Dear TU's and MarsSeed thank you for notifying us, pointing out the problem and the solution. We take the AUR guidelines seriously and will comply with them. I am working on this with priority and will fix it this week. Please let us handle this on our own and don't delete the package. Thank

Re: [PRQ#46514] Orphan Request for frame-eth-dev-appimage

Apologies for the impatience. I'm happy to be co-maintainer. On Sun, 20 Aug 2023 at 19:30, Faisal Moledina wrote: > I was away Aug 5-20. Frame v0.6.7 was released on Aug 9. It is updated in > AUR today. I'm open to adding xrchz as a co-maintainer. Thanks. > > Faisal >

Re: [PRQ#43571] Deletion Request for vmdebootstrap Accepted

Hi, I used to maintain this package before it was removed. I don't think deleting this package from the AUR was the best way forward. While it is true that it has been deprecated on debian, and has been orphaned by the original authors for a while, it was still a useful tool and much simpler

Re: [PRQ#46360] Deletion Request for git-vfs

I should update it, but the Microsoft patches are not for Windows, but specifically git vfs. Those patches make git work better with large monorepos https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_File_System_for_Git On Wed, Aug 16, 2023, 3:20 PM wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for

Re: [PRQ#46363] Deletion Request for perl6-panda

Sounds good to me, delete it. On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:54 PM wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for perl6-panda [2]: > > Deprecated, broken, unmaintained Perl6 module installer from 2016; no > longer recommended to use. [a] > > Nothing depends specifically on this. > > [a]:

Re: [PRQ#46145] Orphan Request for opentabletdriver

Hello, The package is being updated for the upcoming version. There has been new packaging instructions which has complicated the upgrade. I should have an update released some time this week. Please contact us on the OpenTabletDriver Discord if you're interested in helping maintain this

Re: [PRQ#46967] Merge Request for pipewire-common-git

See https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pipewire-common-git?O=40#comment-785408 It's 2023 and pipewire-git is still missing pipewire gstreamer plugins. Many have had tried to ask sl1pkn07, who is pipewire-git's maintainer, to include pipewire gstreamer plugins multiple times, but all have been

Re: [PRQ#46058] Deletion Request for scirenderer

Hello, I'm the current maintainer of the scirenderer package. Please, delete it. I changed PKGBUILD to get source code from the new location, but it is severely outdated. The library is not abandoned, but is developed as a part of Scilab project. It seems to me, that no other program or Arch

Re: [PRQ#46890] Deletion Request for zsh-fix-winchanged-git

I think I'm the maintainer, and I'd be happy to have this deleted.

Re: [PRQ#46166] Deletion Request for gnuradio-maint38-git

Yeah, I agree. On Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 15:16 Marcell Meszaros, wrote: > Upstream stated they have no intention or capacity to maintain the legacy > gnuradio 3.8 branch. > > This git package does not provide 'gnuradio38' [a], so it has no > dependents, only the latter does. > > But both this and

Re: [PRQ#46609] Orphan Request for sway-git

Antonin I did not mean to be sarcastic. I am a Japanese speaker, so I was insensitive to the nuances of translated English. Sorry.

Re: [PRQ#46847] Deletion Request for autopanovideo-beta

Le mer. 30 août 2023 à 10:39, a écrit : > dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for autopanovideo-beta [2]: > > This should be deleted, since version 3.0.0 is now stable and package > `autopanovideopro` needs the appropriate update, which makes > `autopanovideo-beta` a duplicate: > >

Re: [PRQ#46637] Orphan Request for teams-for-linux-bin

I already added MarsSeed as co-maintainer so he could apply the patches his suggests, but he refused this role and simply keeps complaining without posting a working version of the PKGBUILD. I've re-added him as a co-maintainer, let's see if he wants to cooperate or just make the package

Re: [PRQ#46808] Deletion Request for openrazer

On Dienstag, 29. August 2023 06:10:45 CEST not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > polyzen [1] filed a deletion request for openrazer [2]: > > openrazer has been added to the repos, thank you! > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openrazer/

Re: [PRQ#46841] Deletion Request for ncsdk

Hi Marcell, I agreed with the deletion and disowned the package. Thanks for your reminder. Best regards, Yuyuan Yuan On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 5:23 AM wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ncsdk [2]: > > Broken, unmaintained dual Python2/Python3 package from 2018; uses >

Re: [PRQ#47331] Orphan Request for zig-dev-bin

Hi junkes, I am the current maintainer of this package. This package is automatically updated and usually does not require manual intervention. Right now I can successfully run `makepkg` on my machine without needing to modify anything. This auto-updating is similar to "VCS packages" (See the

Re: [PRQ#46609] Orphan Request for sway-git

Thanks for the update, I had forgotten about the package. I'm not using it anymore. I thought I'd update it next week-end but "of course" you were eager to get it working, so I went ahead and orphaned it. Best wishes to the next maintainer. -- Antonin

Re: [PRQ#47316] Deletion Request for cgum-git

I approve of deletion. > On Sep 15, 2023, at 08:37, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for cgum-git [2]: > > Unused, broken VCS package from 2016. > > Upstream not developed during the last 3 years. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >

Re: [PRQ#47108] Orphan Request for nginx-mainline-mod-vts

Please disregard this orphan request - intelfx seems to be back and has since fixed the package. Original Message From: not...@aur.archlinux.org Sent: 8 September 2023 21:34:43 UTC To: aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org Cc: inte...@intelfx.name, jer...@kescher.at Subject:

Re: [PRQ#47205] Deletion Request for dbus-test-runner-bzr

I (the maintainer of this package in aur) agree. I've disowned it, and it should be deleted. On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 14:12 wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for dbus-test-runner-bzr [2]: > > Proposal to delete this VCS pkg from 2018. > > Upstream not developed since 2019. [a] > >

Switching to split package

Hi all, I'm currently maintaining this package on aur but lately the maintainer add a ttf version of it so I want to switch to a split package, have a single codebase and being more consistent with releases. Is there a easy way to achieve this?

Re: [PRQ#47003] Merge Request for waterfox-current-bin Rejected

Um, from what I see the merge happened and both packages comments are in waterfox-bin now On 2023/9/24 9:32, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: Request #47003 has been Rejected by Antiz [1]: Target package doesn't exists anymore [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

Re: [PRQ#46797] Deletion Request for faiss-mkl

: Recipient not found On 7 September 2023 18:19:13 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >>Susperseded > >By what? > >This is not an explanation so it should not be the basis of deletion. > >@fabiscafe, please kindly unhide your email address in AUR, as you are a >Trusted User who should be easy

Re: [PRQ#47128] Deletion Request for lib32-smbclient

>needs for wine And if so, how come none of the AUR wine packages depend on this? And why didn't anyone complain either on bugs.archlinux.org or on the AUR wine package pages? On 9 September 2023 23:28:25 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >>needs for wine > >Which one? > >And what is the

Re: [PRQ#47128] Deletion Request for lib32-smbclient

On Samstag, 9. September 2023 21:00:49 CEST you wrote: > El sáb, 9 sept 2023 a las 14:50, escribió: > > DarkShadow44 [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-smbclient [2]: > > > > This is not needed anymore, the last packages that had this as > > dependency (lib32-gnome-vfs) was deleted a while

Re: [PRQ#47077] Deletion Request for ti-cgt-arm

I'll take a look this weekend and update it. Let's keep, it's nice to have TI toolchains to build code for TI microcontrollers. This pkg is part of this (loose) set: ti-cgt-arm ti-cgt-msp430 ti-msp430ware ti-rtos-cc13xx-cc26xx ti-ble-sdk Thanks. On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, at 9:27 PM,

Re: [PRQ#47937] Orphan Request for linux-pf Accepted

not...@aur.archlinux.org writes: I didn't have time to answer the request (fine by me). But I want to clarify a few points. > Request #47937 has been Accepted by gromit [1]: > > Disowning because: > a) upstream maintainer offered to take over (PRQ#47937) > b) package was not properly maintained

Re: [PRQ#47017] Deletion Request for android-studio-beta-android-studio-provides

On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 20:35:20 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > No. android-studio-beta needs to provide and conflict with android- > studio. As it is now, different versions can be installed in parallel, and I thought that was the intention that `android-studio-beta` and

Accepting a Merge Request

I'm the maintainer of waterfox-current-bin, and I'm trying to accept a merge request to merge it into waterfox-bin, but I don't see any method on the AUR user interface to do so. How can I accept the merge request? - Leo Izen

Re: [PRQ#47724] Deletion Request for promtail-bin

Original Package promtail is flagged out of date. I absolutely agree that this package is a dublicate of the original one in the extra repository. But since the original package doesn't get updated I've created my own package to keep promtail updated. Regards Thorsten Am Donnerstag, 21.

Re: [PRQ#47200] Deletion Request for depixelize-bzr

I'm the original developer and I'm the package maintainer. The algorithm (Kopf-Lichinski) hasn't changed since. In fact, the algorithm will *not* change. It's ridiculous to flag packages on the basis of “upstream not developed since whenever”. Em seg., 11 de set. de 2023 às 13:32, escreveu: >

Re: [PRQ#47717] Deletion Request for gitgud-git

Ahoj, sorry, this should have been an orphan request, not a deletion request. Re-filed orphan request, please reject the deletion request. On Thu, 21 Sep 2023 11:55:40 +, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for gitgud-git [2]: > > A comment from

Re: [PRQ#47561] Deletion Request for python-pillow-simd

Current package maintainer here. I agree with your reasoning and consent to the deletion request. On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 05:42 wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-pillow-simd [2]: > > This is an old duplicate of python-pillow, at version 9.2.0, whereas > repo's pillow is

Re: [PRQ#47521] Deletion Request for nvidia-pf

I don't get your crusade on this package. Yes I didn't update the package but there many, many other packages in the aur that have the issue or worse. I have a typo in the pkgbuild that I will fix. But so far all other issues you reported are simply not true or intended. E.g. the package

Re: [PRQ#47331] Orphan Request for zig-dev-bin

Hello! I tried looking for a way of contacting you via email but it is not publicly listed on AUR, and your homepage (https://techcable.net/) returns a standard 404 nginx page. Although you're right, I could've tried the comments section, but I generally haven't seen many people get answered

Re: [PRQ#47457] Deletion Request for ayn-platform-dkms-git

Cancel request. I changed my mind after discussing with kernel driver maintainers. On Sun, Sep 17, 2023, 15:29 wrote: > pastaq [1] filed a request to merge ayn-platform-dkms-git [2] into > ayn-sensors-dk [3]: > > Replaced by ayn-sensors-dkms-git after splitting LED's into a separate > package.

Fwd: [PRQ#48390] Deletion Request for tiawa-devenv

-- Forwarded message - From: Hendrik W Date: Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [PRQ#48390] Deletion Request for tiawa-devenv To: Cc: This is not a personal package. The reason I started packaging this was specifically because friends asked me to. See the AUR

Re: [PRQ#48389] Deletion Request for tiawa-base

This is not a personal package. The reason I started packaging this was specifically because friends asked me to. See the AUR submission guidelines ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines): Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want > to use

Re: [PRQ#48257] Deletion Request for php73-igbinary

> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for php73-igbinary [2]: Confirming this is fine with me to delete.

Re: [PRQ#48390] Deletion Request for tiawa-devenv

This is not a personal package. The reason I started packaging this was specifically because friends asked me to. See the AUR submission guidelines ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines): Make sure the package you want to upload is useful. Will anyone else want > to use

Re: [PRQ#47899] Merge Request for tor-browser

I like how you have time to take control of the package but not update it. \- Sebastian \ Original Message On Sep 24, 2023, 1:52 PM, < not...@aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > FabioLolix \[1\] filed a request to merge tor-browser \[2\] into tor- > browser-bin \[3\]:

Re: [PRQ#48256] Deletion Request for php73-redis

> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for php73-redis [2]: Confirming this is fine with me to delete.

Re: [PRQ#48194] Deletion Request for emacs-24bit

Yes, I'm not using/maintaining this anymore, I looked quick to see if I could approve the deletion request but didn't see a method. Thanks, Chris. > On Sep 29, 2023, at 18:53, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for emacs-24bit [2]: > > Abandoned,

Re: [PRQ#48070] Deletion Request for acestream-engine

Maintainer here. Package is not broken. If by "broken" you mean deletion of python2-apsw dependency I'll restore it. If you worry about using it in the wild it could be bundled in this package. Package is not defunct. Actually it's the only stable release provided by upstream

  1   2   3   >