Re: [PRQ#60023] Deletion Request for amarok

On 6 May 2024 15:39:05 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >mackel [1] filed a deletion request for amarok [2]: > >Now the Castaway version was updated. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mackel/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/amarok/ @mackel, what do you mean by that? It is

Re: [PRQ#59976] Deletion Request for zfs-utils-rc

On 4 May 2024 10:29:57 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Althorion [1] filed a deletion request for zfs-utils-rc [2]: > >orphaned, old, not updated, redundant to zfs-utls; can be misleading > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Althorion/ >[2]

Re: [PRQ#59818] Deletion Request for sudoku-git

On 30 April 2024 15:15:59 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >NhaMeh [1] filed a deletion request for sudoku-git [2]: > >Nobody wants nor needs this > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/NhaMeh/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sudoku-git/ I might be just one person, but I use

Re: [PRQ#59779] Deletion Request for ffmpeg-nocuda

On 29 April 2024 21:59:28 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ffmpeg-nocuda [2]: > >Unbuildable duplicate build of Arch/extra/ffmpeg (though newer >version.) >This is the 2nd resubmit of this package after it was already deleted >once. [a] >

Re: [PRQ#59798] Deletion Request for graphite-web

On 30 April 2024 10:42:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for graphite-web [2]: > >It is not viable to keep this broken package. > >Upstream hasn't released a new version since 2022 [a], and since then >they stopped developing it and only accepted

Re: [PRQ#59772] Deletion Request for widevine

On 29 April 2024 20:16:54 GMT+02:00, Dan Johansen wrote: > >Den 29.04.2024 kl. 20.09 skrev not...@aur.archlinux.org: >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for widevine [2]: >> >> Re-filing a deletion request due to not receiving any response [a] as >> to the rationale to keep this duplicate

Re: [PRQ#59755] Deletion Request for pipewire-common-git

On 29 April 2024 12:07:49 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >On 29 April 2024 04:21:36 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>eh5 [1] filed a deletion request for pipewire-common-git [2]: >> >>No intention to keep maintaining. >> >>[1] https://aur.archl

Re: [PRQ#59755] Deletion Request for pipewire-common-git

On 29 April 2024 04:21:36 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >eh5 [1] filed a deletion request for pipewire-common-git [2]: > >No intention to keep maintaining. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eh5/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pipewire-common-git/ +1 for deletion, as

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

On 28 April 2024 18:48:44 GMT+02:00, Muflone wrote: > >>> Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: >>> >>> see previous package maintainer answer >>> >>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ >> @Muflone, what do you mean exactly? >> >> The package is not buildable and

Re: [PRQ#59704] Deletion Request for element-desktop-deb-package

s each other. > >Am 2024-04-28 14:12, schrieb Marcell Meszaros: > >> On 28 April 2024 13:16:50 GMT+02:00, "André M. Wollmarker" >> wrote: This package will be updated as soon >> as I receive an EOL message. >> It is 100% based on the deb package from

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

On 28 April 2024 17:29:00 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: > >see previous package maintainer answer > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ @Muflone, what do you mean exactly? The package is not buildable and installable on

Re: [PRQ#59704] Deletion Request for element-desktop-deb-package

On 28 April 2024 13:16:50 GMT+02:00, "André M. Wollmarker" wrote: >This package will be updated as soon as I receive an EOL message. >It is 100% based on the deb package from the original developers and thus >minimises some of the problems I and others have with the Arch package. >It is

Re: [PRQ#50004] Deletion Request for blender-2.83-git Rejected

On 1 April 2024 01:16:02 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #50004 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: > >the package was updated > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ That is not a good reason to keep a broken EOL package. The last PKGBUILD change didn't fix it, patch

Re: [PRQ#59691] Deletion Request for python-sqlglot

On 28 April 2024 08:22:47 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >On 28 April 2024 03:50:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>gaogao_qwq [1] filed a deletion request for python-sqlglot [2]: >> >>The package is currently out of dated. >> >>[1] https://aur

Re: [PRQ#59691] Deletion Request for python-sqlglot

On 28 April 2024 03:50:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >gaogao_qwq [1] filed a deletion request for python-sqlglot [2]: > >The package is currently out of dated. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gaogao_qwq/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-sqlglot/ And how

Re: [PRQ#59422] Deletion Request for hurl

On 22 April 2024 11:02:30 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >kpcyrd [1] filed a deletion request for hurl [2]: > >This package name is already in use in [extra] > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kpcyrd/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hurl/ AUR/hurl (GOPHER downloader) got

Re: [PRQ#59513] Merge Request for python-tts Rejected

On 27 April 2024 17:12:43 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #59513 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: > >coqui-ai/tts is a TTS library for Python so the package python-tts is >the best suited for this software, regardless the presence of a >command line utility script to use some

Re: [PRQ#59658] Deletion Request for rustic-bin

On 27 April 2024 11:18:45 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >AlphaJack [1] filed a deletion request for rustic-bin [2]: > >Package is now available as [extra]/rustic > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaJack/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rustic-bin/ +1 for deletion, as

Re: [PRQ#59587] Orphan Request for 04b_21

On 26 April 2024 14:11:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >qubeck [1] filed an orphan request for 04b_21 [2]: > >Source is unavailable. Last updated in 2015 > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/qubeck/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/04b_21/ This package can actually be

Re: [PRQ#59541] Orphan Request for perl-mldbm

On 25 April 2024 07:28:49 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for perl-mldbm [2]: > >out of date for 2 months > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/perl-mldbm/ Well, it's not actually out-of-date, but

Re: [PRQ#59561] Deletion Request for yandex-messenger

On 25 April 2024 16:07:26 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >qubeck [1] filed a deletion request for yandex-messenger [2]: > >According to paragraph 5.5 of Yandex Messenger License agreement, it's >not allowed to distribute this software without written permission of >the owner. >Since

Re: [PRQ#59573] Deletion Request for yandex-music

On 25 April 2024 21:34:29 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >qubeck [1] filed a deletion request for yandex-music [2]: > >According to clause 4.3 of the Yandex Music License Agreement, it's >prohibited to distribute modified versions of software without written >permission of the owner.

Re: [PRQ#59564] Deletion Request for aiopmplus

On 25 April 2024 18:26:40 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for aiopmplus [2]: > >Useless, broken, badly packaged. Upstream code is dead on arrival. > >Depends on AUR/eaur from same owner, who submitted his own package for >deletion (PRQ#59562). [a]

Re: [PRQ#59567] Deletion Request for aiopm

On 25 April 2024 18:42:38 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for aiopm [2]: > >Seriously violates packaging etiquette: runs > sudo mkdir /usr/aiopm; sudo touch /usr/aiopm/a1.cw >inside the build() function. > >And useless, broken, badly packaged.

Re: [PRQ#59479] Deletion Request for krunner-vscodeprojects

On 24 April 2024 02:05:32 GMT+02:00, "Jonas Bögle" wrote: >Hi, no new releases for two years is not a valid reason for deletion. The >project is still actively maintained. > >Upstream worked on KDE Plasma 6 support in the last couple of days/weeks [b], >so I'd expect a new release soon-ish. >

Re: [PRQ#59114] Orphan Request for deeplx-bin

On 13 April 2024 22:31:56 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for deeplx-bin [2]: > >Flagged out-of-date (2024-03-08). > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deeplx-bin/ The package was versionbumped,

Re: [PRQ#59291] Merge Request for plasma5-applets-mpdnowplaying

>> >marcel83 [1] filed a request to merge plasma5-applets-mpdnowplaying >> >[2] into plasma-applet-mpdnowplaying [3]: >> > >> >Ported to Plasma 6, hence the old package name is misleading. >> > >> >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/marcel83/ >> >[2]

Re: [PRQ#59291] Merge Request for plasma5-applets-mpdnowplaying

On 18 April 2024 21:48:21 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >marcel83 [1] filed a request to merge plasma5-applets-mpdnowplaying >[2] into plasma-applet-mpdnowplaying [3]: > >Ported to Plasma 6, hence the old package name is misleading. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/marcel83/

Re: [PRQ#59285] Deletion Request for neovim-symlinks

On 18 April 2024 20:45:34 GMT+02:00, Doug Newgard wrote: >On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:37:46 + >not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: > >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-symlinks [2]: >> >> This shim package is an inferior, less compatible >> duplicate of AUR/neovim-drop-in [a], which

Re: [PRQ#54087] Deletion Request for mplayer2-build-git Accepted

On 16 April 2024 02:23:21 GMT+02:00, Muflone wrote: >Hi > > >> https://github.com/astiob/mplayer2/issues/3 >> >> >> :( > >I asked you before what was the use case for the package and you replied me it >has no use case, apart being broken. > >If

Re: [PRQ#53190] Deletion Request for linux-api-headers-git Rejected

On 14 April 2024 16:26:20 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #53190 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: > >the package was updated > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ Does not make the package legitimate, still an unneeded duplicate. See refiled PRQ#59168.

Re: [PRQ#50919] Deletion Request for gurobi80

On 12 November 2023 15:30:44 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gurobi80 [2]: > >Unneeded, EOL legacy version of Gurobi from 2018, >based on Python 2 and 3.7. > >AUR has the latest version of Gurobi, not useful to keep this old one. > >[1]

Re: [PRQ#52543] Deletion Request for newsqueak

On 28 December 2023 18:11:06 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for newsqueak [2]: > >Historical package from 2000. Fails to build. >Not useful to keep. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2]

Re: [PRQ#57980] Deletion Request for meson-rust

On 18 March 2024 18:57:35 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for meson-rust [2]: > >This modded variant of Arch repo's rust continues to be broken in >build or in testing. > >The experimental patch used here is abandoned since Nov 2023. [a] > >Does

Re: [PRQ#58981] Orphan Request for xorg-xwayland-git

On 9 April 2024 09:34:48 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >xiota [1] filed an orphan request for xorg-xwayland-git [2]: > >Package has been flagged for months. The current maintainer, tallero >[a] (aka truocolo [b]), has never pushed any change to this package. >He has a history of

Re: [PRQ#58983] Orphan Request for xorg-xwayland-git

>On 09/04/2024 10:44, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >> On 9 April 2024 10:31:12 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>> ChrisLane [1] filed an orphan request for xorg-xwayland-git [2]: >>> >>> After contacting tallero via email, I was informed that the

Re: [PRQ#58983] Orphan Request for xorg-xwayland-git

On 9 April 2024 10:31:12 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >ChrisLane [1] filed an orphan request for xorg-xwayland-git [2]: > >After contacting tallero via email, I was informed that they are >unable to maintain any AUR packages. >Followed by them publishing my email on social media

Re: [PRQ#58908] Deletion Request for xorg-server-bug865-bug1578

On 8 April 2024 02:16:06 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >On 8 April 2024 00:58:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for xorg-server- >>bug865-bug1578 [2]: >> >>Completely ridiculous package name. If the

Re: [PRQ#58908] Deletion Request for xorg-server-bug865-bug1578

On 8 April 2024 00:58:08 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for xorg-server- >bug865-bug1578 [2]: > >Completely ridiculous package name. If there's an issue with the xorg- >server package, create a bug report. > >[1]

Re: [PRQ#57697] Deletion Request for shiboken

>carlosal1015 [1] filed a deletion request for shiboken [2]: > >Package available in >https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python-shiboken2 > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/carlosal1015/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/shiboken/ +1 for deletion, though the stated reason is

Re: [PRQ#58720] Deletion Request for mipsel-ps2-irx-binutils

On 4 April 2024 01:34:59 GMT+02:00, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote: > >https://github.com/ps2dev/ps2toolchain-iop/blob/main/config/ps2toolchain-iop-config.sh A git branch is referenced there, but only for the "iop" variant, not the "irx" one. So it seems a VCS package should be created for the

Re: [PRQ#58718] Deletion Request for mipsel-ps2-irx-gcc-stage1

SpinFlo wrote: > >13.2.0 available > >https://github.com/ps2dev/ps2toolchain-iop/blob/main/config/ps2toolchain-iop-config.sh A git branch is referenced there. So it seems a VCS package should be created for the updated version.

Re: [PRQ#58717] Deletion Request for mipsel-ps2-elf-gcc-stage1

SpinFlo wrote: >updare to 13.2.0 available > >https://github.com/ps2dev/ps2toolchain-ee/blob/main/config/ps2toolchain-ee-config.sh A git branch is referenced there. So it seems a VCS package should be created for the updated version.

Re: [PRQ#58792] Deletion Request for plasma-phone-components-git

On 4 April 2024 11:49:07 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >cniw [1] filed a deletion request for plasma-phone-components-git [2]: > >nothing, thanks. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cniw/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/plasma-phone-components-git/ You should have

Re: [PRQ#57959] Orphan Request for pidgin-light

On 18 March 2024 01:35:47 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >muflone [1] filed an orphan request for pidgin-light [2]: > >Fails to build. Last updated for v2.14.12 on 2023-10-30 > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pidgin-light/

Re: [PRQ#52086] Deletion Request for libsrsbsns

On 13 December 2023 12:12:32 GMT+01:00, heinrich5...@gmail.com wrote: >On 12/10/23 14:27, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libsrsbsns [2]: >> >> Unneeded, discontinued joke library from 2013. [a] >> >> Just read upstream repo's "About" section to see

Re: [PRQ#52150] Deletion Request for mpdproxy-coffeescript-git

On 13 December 2023 13:36:18 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for mpdproxy-coffeescript-git >[2]: > >Broken, unused package. Fails to build. >Upstream not maintained since 2020. [a] > >Even if the needed makedepend is satisfied, the package is

Re: [PRQ#58436] Merge Request for plasma5-applet-awesome-widgets

>arcanis [1] filed a request to merge plasma5-applet-awesome-widgets >[2] into plasma6-applet-awesome-widgets [3]: > >updated to plasma 6 version, plasma 5 version is no longer supported > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arcanis/ >[2]

Re: [PRQ#49462] Deletion Request for libdbus-minimal Rejected

On 26 March 2024 00:44:16 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #49462 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: > >while I hate these type of packages and I'd be happy to delete them, >it still has its right to be on the AUR as it builds fine, it's >maintained and it's a choice for anyone

Re: [PRQ#58384] Orphan Request for python-mistune2

On 26 March 2024 00:07:02 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >PlasticSoup [1] filed an orphan request for python-mistune2 [2]: > >Package has been out of date for three months. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/PlasticSoup/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-mistune2/

Re: [PRQ#58235] Deletion Request for python-mod

On 23 March 2024 21:34:29 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-mod [2]: > >Useless dead-on-arrival package, only reverse dependency is >the similarly broken-from-day-one grok >(deletion request submitted by @Muflone: PRQ#58232). > >==>

Re: [PRQ#49158] Deletion Request for gimp-font-rendering-fix

though the description is a bit out of date (I can fix it) the code >>snippet in this package is still valid and useful. On 18 October 2023 11:32:52 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros wrote: >I suggest that you please kindly file a bug report upstream and/or in Arch bug >tracking

Re: [PRQ#58106] Deletion Request for pk-update-icon

On 21 March 2024 12:21:31 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >mhdi [1] filed a deletion request for pk-update-icon [2]: > >pk-update-icon is no longer developed and will only receive fixes for >critical bugs and security issues. All users are encouraged to switch >to

Re: [PRQ#58255] Deletion Request for xfce4-multiload-nandhp-plugin-git

>ElementW [1] filed a deletion request for xfce4-multiload-nandhp- >plugin-git [2]: > >Since deletion request #57899 was denied on the basis of being a non- >owner request, here's take two, from the owner this time. This is >outdated, still relies on GTK2 Xfce (long gone) etc... > >[1]

Re: [PRQ#58230] Deletion Request for mediascan

On 23 March 2024 19:41:01 GMT+01:00, Pellegrino Prevete wrote: > >there is no hidden dependency, the PKGBUILD is simply unified among all >pacman supported platforms. >The program can use a `termux-api` component on Android, so there's an android >specific dependency if built from there,

Re: [PRQ#50398] Deletion Request for gourmet-git

On 6 November 2023 14:37:17 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gourmet-git [2]: > >Upstream not maintained since 2020. [a] >Not useful to keep a developmental VCS package for it. > >The successor fork is called gourmand. >There's a stable AUR

Re: [PRQ#50307] Deletion Request for python-gto

>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-gto [2]: > >This new package is a CLI application; should be named 'gto' > >@naetherm, thank you for sharing your PKGBUILD. >Please kindly change the pkgname to 'gto' and resubmit as AUR/gto, >to align with Arch Python package guidelines. [a] >

Re: [PRQ#57938] Deletion Request for ocamlnet

On 23 March 2024 14:55:10 GMT+01:00, Oliver Bandel wrote: >Quoting Marcell Meszaros (snt: 2024-03-23 07:22 >+0100 CET) (rcv: 2024-03-23 07:22 +0100 CET): >> On 17 March 2024 14:30:01 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion re

Re: [PRQ#57934] Deletion Request for any-dl

On 23 March 2024 14:55:52 GMT+01:00, Oliver Bandel wrote: >Quoting Marcell Meszaros (snt: 2024-03-23 07:23 >+0100 CET) (rcv: 2024-03-23 07:23 +0100 CET): >> On 17 March 2024 13:22:23 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion

Re: [PRQ#49130] Deletion Request for i2p-dev

On 17 October 2023 10:08:22 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for i2p-dev [2]: > >This package, last updated in 2021, has some issues (badly defined >source). > >But instead of calling for a fix, I recommend deletion, on the basis >that upstream does

Re: [PRQ#49836] Deletion Request for lib32-gd

On 23 March 2024 16:50:53 GMT+01:00, Doug Newgard wrote: >On Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:34:28 +0100 >Marcell Meszaros wrote: > >> >Marcell Meszaros wrote: >> > >> >> Affected are 10 or so AUR packages, none of which have any viable use case &g

Re: [PRQ#49836] Deletion Request for lib32-gd

>Marcell Meszaros wrote: > >> Affected are 10 or so AUR packages, none of which have any viable use case in >> lib32 at all, and never even had. > > >Really? So you can guarantee that nobody could be using these libraries for any >local project? It doesn't matter in

Re: [PRQ#49836] Deletion Request for lib32-gd

>> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-gd [2]: >> >> lib32-gd is absolutely unnecessary for lib32-libgphoto2. >> >> The latter could only use gd for on-the-fly image conversion two >> specific digital "picture frame" hardware, for which libgphoto2 >> introduced support in 2015, well

Re: [PRQ#54149] Deletion Request for chkservice-git

On 27 February 2024 17:30:14 GMT+01:00, jahway603 wrote: >THIS PACKAGE HAS NOW BEEN FIXED, SO DO NOT DELETE THIS. I WAS NOT THE ORIGINAL >PACKAGER OR MAINTAINER, BUT THIS PACKAGE IS NOW FIXED. The package still fails to build, and there's still no newer upstream commit than what the stable

Re: [PRQ#54086] Deletion Request for wxwidgets-light

>> >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wxwidgets-light [2]: >> > >> >Unmaintained since 2023-07-31, and currently several point releases >> >older than repo's wxwidgets (3.2.2.1 vs 3.2.4). >> > >> >But this is also apparently unused, as no one flagged it. >> > >> >And it's not beneficial to

Re: [PRQ#54086] Deletion Request for wxwidgets-light

On 22 February 2024 20:58:03 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wxwidgets-light [2]: > >Unmaintained since 2023-07-31, and currently several point releases >older than repo's wxwidgets (3.2.2.1 vs 3.2.4). > >But this is also apparently unused, as

Re: [PRQ#50823] Merge Request for ibus-table-mongol-bichig-git Rejected

>> Request #50823 has been Rejected by Foxboron [1]: >> >> Invalid >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/ > > On 23 March 2024 14:32:06 GMT+01:00, Popolon wrote: >I don't know why for I received the message, anyway my table has been merged >in official ibus-table-others at least

Re: [PRQ#57160] Merge Request for ffmpeg21 Rejected

>>MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge ffmpeg21 [2] into ffmpeg2.1 [3]: >> >>Package got renamed by maintainer, and changed the two reverse >>dependencies to require the new one instead of the old. >> >>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >>[2]

Re: [PRQ#58056] Merge Request for python-pixcat-an-prata Rejected

On 23 March 2024 12:46:55 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #58056 has been Rejected by Foxboron [1]: > >submit a deletion request. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/ Hi @Foxboron, Please kindly help me, I am at a loss here. I would like to understand your

Re: [PRQ#58192] Merge Request for at-spi2-atk-git Rejected

On 23 March 2024 12:34:53 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #58192 has been Rejected by Foxboron [1]: > >Stop playing games. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Foxboron/ I'm sorry, I don't understand. What games? I'm not playing any games. Upsteam has stopped maintaining

Re: [PRQ#57934] Deletion Request for any-dl

On 17 March 2024 13:22:23 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for any-dl [2]: > >ocamlnet is not compatible with ocaml5, so this package in turn is not >compatible with current Arch Linux. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2]

Re: [PRQ#57938] Deletion Request for ocamlnet

On 17 March 2024 14:30:01 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ocamlnet [2]: > >Broken for close to 1 year due to not being compatible with repo's >ocaml 5, first published in May 2023. > >Upstream seems to be abandoned (developer only attends to

Re: [PRQ#50004] Deletion Request for blender-2.83-git

On 1 November 2023 15:36:59 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for blender-2.83-git [2]: > >Blender 2.83 EOL since Q2 2022, 2.83 branch doesn't exist anymore, and >even original upstream Git repo server has been decommissioned in >favor of migrating

Re: [PRQ#57622] Deletion Request for gtk3-git

On 11 March 2024 14:04:43 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gtk3-git [2]: > >Broken as of now; flagged for it since 2024-02-09. Seems not much >maintained. > >It is also badly packaged. > >But upstream is in minimal maintenance mode. >A new minor

Re: [PRQ#58160] Deletion Request for ultimmc-bin

On 22 March 2024 06:48:13 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Zetabite [1] filed a deletion request for ultimmc-bin [2]: > >This launcher infringes upon the trademark or similar of >Mircosoft/Mojang by distributing Minecraft without the need of a valid >account. This is per the license of

Re: [PRQ#57752] Merge Request for xfce4-sensors-plugin-nvidia-hddtemp_through_netcat-current

>>MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge xfce4-sensors-plugin-nvidia- >>hddtemp_through_netcat-current [2] into xfce4-sensors-plugin-nvidia >>[3]: >> >>The package with the excessively long name is broken, but not needed: >>'xfce4-sensors-plugin-nvidia' is already the latest version. >> >>[1]

Re: [PRQ#50214] Deletion Request for imlib2-heic Rejected

>> Request #50214 has been Rejected by MarsSeed [1]: >> >> Closing stale non-owner's request. >> >> @dllud, please kindly submit your own deletion request, as owners' >> submissions are treated with priority. > > >On 22 March 2024 16:21:44 GMT+01:00, dllud wrote: > >Done. Got numbered as

Re: [PRQ#52874] Deletion Request for global-appmenu-applet-whose-menu-mnemonic-has-been-disabled-git

On 9 January 2024 19:17:22 GMT+01:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for global-appmenu-applet-whose- >menu-mnemonic-has-been-disabled-git [2]: > >Broken, unmaintained, unneeded package. > >Also, a package name has to be reasonably short, and not consist of

Re: [PRQ#49369] Deletion Request for mpv-caca

On 21 October 2023 13:27:48 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for mpv-caca [2]: > >I don't think it's useful to keep this legacy mpv version. Upstream >dropped libcaca support, so this cannot be updated to newer version, >unlike extra repo's mpv. >

Re: [PRQ#57531] Deletion Request for drun

On 9 March 2024 18:08:15 GMT+01:00, Jer Syl wrote: >On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 at 08:26, wrote: >> >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for drun [2]: >> >> EOL release from 2009, broken, nothing depends on it. >> >> Dependency ruby-gtk2 is not compatible with current Ruby libs in repo. >> >> [1]

Re: [PRQ#49617] Deletion Request for ceph-pacific

>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ceph-pacific [2]: > >This legacy Ceph (v16) runtime is not needed anymore by any other AUR >package, and it depends on aur/librdkafka1, which violates AUR >submission guidelines by conflicting with repo's newer librdkafka. > >I recommend deleting this. No

Re: [PRQ#49619] Deletion Request for ceph-octopus

>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ceph-octopus [2]: > >This legacy Ceph (v15) runtime is not needed anymore. >(Latest major stable version is v18.) > >Also, this depends on aur/librdkafka1, which violates AUR submission >guidelines by conflicting with repo's newer librdkafka. > >I

Re: [PRQ#57994] Orphan Request for duckstation

>Dear xiota, could you describe your issues in more detail? I built this >package a couple days ago. Pellegrino, see my comment on the duckstation AUR page with the error log from 2024-03-09, which you haven't addressed yet, only dismissed it. Or see sgt-hartman's error log from 2024-03-18.

Re: [PRQ#49673] Deletion Request for kamerka

On 26 October 2023 16:10:15 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for kamerka [2]: > >Discontinued since 4 years ago. [a] >Broken as of now. Depends on kdelibs4support, which is EOL and won't >be supported on KDE Plasma 6, coming in a few months. > >[a]:

Re: [PRQ#49093] Deletion Request for lib32-freetype2-v35

>On 16 October 2023 21:41:27 GMT+02:00, Natrio wrote: >Updated. > >A package from the repository supports v35 by setting an environment variable >that can be filtered and ignored by some applications. This has already been >written in the comments to the package: >

Re: [PRQ#49566] Deletion Request for i4tools-bin

On 25 October 2023 17:26:02 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for i4tools-bin [2]: > >Broken proprietary foreign binary application, last released for Linux >in 2021. >Doesn't work with current libraries: it would need 25+ legacy SO files >not

Re: [PRQ#49113] Merge Request for wxlauncher Rejected

>Request #49113 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: > >as long it works there's no point in deleting it But as was stated by maintainer and myself, the stable package doesn't work, only the -git one.

Re: [PRQ#57969] Deletion Request for python-pixcat-an-prata

On 18 March 2024 23:59:21 GMT+01:00, Evan Overman wrote: >In reference to PRQ#57969 - Deletion request: > >I have created the new package `python-pixcat-an-prata-git`, but have >failed to find how to delete the incorrectly named package. The Arch Wiki >details the request process but does not

Re: [PRQ#53168] Deletion Request for thunar-gtk2-static-libs

On 25 February 2024 13:58:16 GMT+01:00, Nils wrote: >i believe this is the first time i use a mailing list, i hope it works.. > > >I (budRich) am the maintainer of thunar-gtk2-static-libs . The package built >fine for me and i didn't know about any issues for others but i had a good

Re: [PRQ#57951] Deletion Request for didjvu

On 17 March 2024 22:01:30 GMT+01:00, Markus Schaaf wrote: >Am 17.03.24 um 21:23 schrieb not...@aur.archlinux.org: >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for didjvu [2]: >> >> Djvu is practically dead except for readers and tools than convert >> from it to other formats. > >This is a totally

Re: [PRQ#57904] Merge Request for eclipse-cpp-bin

Mattia, please kindly use bottom-posting style instead of top-positing. On 16 March 2024 23:05:54 GMT+01:00, Mattia Moffa wrote: >Please, note that it has already been decided multiple times by trusted users >that Eclipse packages should not include the -bin suffix. The eclipse-java-bin >and

Re: [PRQ#57904] Merge Request for eclipse-cpp-bin

>altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into >eclipse-cpp [3]: > >- The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained >- Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre- >built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java >software shouldn't have

Re: [PRQ#57600] Merge Request for plasma5-applets-weather-widget-2

Hi, Thank you for your response. First of all, please kindly make sure next time that you reply to the mailing list address as well, not just to my personal email address. Thanks in advance! >so why do we have plasma-desktop and not plasma6-desktop?

Re: [PRQ#57600] Merge Request for plasma5-applets-weather-widget-2

>ali [1] filed a request to merge plasma5-applets-weather-widget-2 [2] >into plasma-applets-weather-widget-2 [3]: > >Ported to Plasma 6 > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ali/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/plasma5-applets-weather-widget-2/ >[3]

Re: [PRQ#57560] Deletion Request for kate-root

You might also need to install 'polkit-kde-agent' for supporting the root password dialog.

Re: [PRQ#57560] Deletion Request for kate-root

>> Non-root Kate can do everything a root Kate would be able to do. >> If you opened a file with read-only access, upon saving, it will >> prompt you for root credentials. > >For me not. > >Maybe if used within a full-fledged KDE environment. One does not need a full KDE desktop, only Kate's

Re: [PRQ#57560] Deletion Request for kate-root

>I maintain the package, and I use and need it. You don't need it. >"totally unneeded" I want to refute, since "official" kate refuses to >run as root (and for me also under sudo!). That's by design. Don't try to run it as root. >If you thin "totally uneeded", please argue why. I have already

Re: [PRQ#57560] Deletion Request for kate-root

>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for kate-root [2]: > >Currenty broken. But also completely unneeded. > >Repo's kate fully supports prompting the user for root write access, >and also can open files via the admin:// protocol (if extra/kio-admin >package is installed). I just saw that this

Re: [PRQ#52485] Deletion Request for python-resvg-cli

>micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for python-resvg-cli [2]: > >Same software as aur/resvg > >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-resvg-cli/ +1 for deletion, as this also violates Arch package guidelines by not declaring sources and using pip to fetch and install prebuilt binaries

Re: [PRQ#57371] Orphan Request for duckstation Rejected

>Request #57371 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: > >the package was updated Pellegrino Prevete's update did not help; he pushed a broken update as quite usual with him.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >