[PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript Rejected

2023-04-08 Thread notify
Request #40896 has been Rejected by Antiz [1]: Nonfree and **closed source** software does not necessarily have to use the `-bin` prefix as there can never be any source based packages for them (since the sources are closed). See

Re: [PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript

2023-04-07 Thread Fabio Loli
Il 07/04/23 17:56, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This

[PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript

2023-04-07 Thread notify
RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the