Hello again
To be honest, my preference would still be to merge both packages
under the "widevine" name. I'm willing to maintain such a merged
package.
It won't happen as chromium-widevine is way more more popular, still
maintained, has a huge number of votes and comments, while
Hi Fabio,
To be honest, my preference would still be to merge both packages
under the "widevine" name. I'm willing to maintain such a merged
package.
It won't happen as chromium-widevine is way more more popular, still
maintained, has a huge number of votes and comments, while widevine is
Hi Bart
To be honest, my preference would still be to merge both packages
under the "widevine" name. I'm willing to maintain such a merged
package.
It won't happen as chromium-widevine is way more more popular, still
maintained, has a huge number of votes and comments, while widevine is
On 12/05/2024 14:06, Muflone wrote:
Therefore, apart the browsers registration, this package offers the same
content of chromium-widevine, I suppose.
Its plus is registering the same plugin in multiple browsers location.
So in the end, why don't you simply use the chromium-widevine
Hello
Il 06/05/24 11:20, Bart De Vries ha scritto:
Hi,
The chromium-widevine package only covers chromium and
chromium-derivatives (and only x86_64), as evidenced by it being
installed into `/usr/lib/chromium` where (only) chromium will find it
automatically.
As the pinned comment for
Hi,
The chromium-widevine package only covers chromium and
chromium-derivatives (and only x86_64), as evidenced by it being
installed into `/usr/lib/chromium` where (only) chromium will find it
automatically.
As the pinned comment for chromium-widevine already mentions, this is
not
Hello
Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
see previous package maintainer answer
[1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
@Muflone, what do you mean exactly?
The package is not buildable and installable on Arch Linux due to missing a
dependency, 'glibc-widevine'. That
On 28 April 2024 18:48:44 GMT+02:00, Muflone wrote:
>
>>> Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
>>>
>>> see previous package maintainer answer
>>>
>>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
>> @Muflone, what do you mean exactly?
>>
>> The package is not buildable and
Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
see previous package maintainer answer
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
@Muflone, what do you mean exactly?
The package is not buildable and installable on Arch Linux due to missing a
dependency, 'glibc-widevine'. That was an
On 28 April 2024 17:29:00 GMT+02:00, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
>Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
>
>see previous package maintainer answer
>
>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
@Muflone, what do you mean exactly?
The package is not buildable and installable on
Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
see previous package maintainer answer
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
11 matches
Mail list logo
