So, just to confirm: if you follow all 10 of Martin's steps starting
with patch-49 do you obtain a working version of Axiom including
Hyperdoc and graphics?
Yes. I just finished a new trial again with 49 and 50 at the same time.
50 breaks, 49 doesn't. I hope somebody can reproduce this.
Sorry for disappearing suddenly, my internet connection went down. I'm
not sure what the problem was but it works again.
root [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2) Tim looked at porting Axiom to the MAC.
There is an outstanding GCL issue. GCL save-system cannot save
images that will execute
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/public/TheUnknownInComputerAlgebra.pdf
Ah, by the way, I've read the paper and did not find it particularly
useful. What they do is a bit too complicated in my eyes.
\begin{spad}
)abbrev domain PUNINT PureUnknownInteger
PureUnknownInteger
On September 19, 2006 11:21 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/public/TheUnknownInComputerAlgebra.pdf
Ah, by the way, I've read the paper and did not find it particularly
useful. What they do is a bit too complicated in my eyes.
\begin{spad}
)abbrev domain
Hello,
At line 15282 of src/doc/book.pamphlet (page 299 in the produced DVI
file) the polynomial wrote in LaTeX mathematical mode (display) is
enclosed in a verbatim environment. The verbatim environment can be
removed.
Greg
___
Axiom-developer
In spite of planning the mirror the SourceForge SVN archive on
axiom-developer.org, I think maintaining a smaller archive on Google -
containing only the most experimental branch, i.e. build-improvements,
is still a good idea.
Of course this needs someone to manage it and keep it up to date
with
On 09/19/2006 06:25 PM, Bill Page wrote:
It is certainly a wrong design to implement indefinite integers
as
polynomials.
Why?
Suppose you have a nice algebra library and you want the system to
understand indefinite objects, then you are certainly not going to
add any function to existing
On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 1:18 PM Alfredo Portes wrote:
For what I have read, build-improvements will be gone after
Gaby's work is completed and added to Silver - Gold.
It wont be gone, it will be merged back into Silver Trunk and
someday merged into Gold (if/when Tim Daly is
The terminology is still rather confusing, but from my point
of view the axiom.build-improvements branch is a branch of
Silver. So I guess you are asking whether you should put the
Silver *trunk* branch into the Google Code archive?
Sorry, I should be more explicit :) . Yes I meant having the
Hi Bill,
Should I put Silver on the repository?
The terminology is still rather confusing, but from my point
of view the axiom.build-improvements branch is a branch of
Silver.
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00344.html
The terminology is actually not
On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 4:19 PM Ralf Hemmecke
Should I put Silver on the repository?
Bill Page wrote:
The terminology is still rather confusing, but from my point
of view the axiom.build-improvements branch is a branch of
Silver.
The point is that we should *not* call the whole SourceForge SVN
repository Silver, but only the trunk. Otherwise Silver =
Sourceforge/Axiom (with now 3 or 4 (different) branches of the
axiom Sources).
Are you referring to the CVS on SourceForge (presumably identical
to the CVS on Savannah)? I
Alfredo Portes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Apparently Google did not increase the size to 200 MB.
I got an email that the hosting team would get into contact with me.
I'll ping them.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Page, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
| Well, this is open source development which mean release early
| and releas often. The more accessible our experimental branchs
| are, the more they will be tested and the better our software
| will become.
I agree with this sentiment.
-- Gaby
On 19 Sep 2006 23:10:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alfredo Portes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Apparently Google did not increase the size to 200 MB.
I got an email that the hosting team would get into contact with me.
I'll ping them.
-- Gaby
Thanks Gaby.
On Tuesday, September 19, 2006 5:14 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
...
BTW, why cannot axiom--windows--1 be merged with axiom--main--1?
Is it so different?
It is different but not too different. There are changes in
some of the Boot and Lisp code because Axiom uses some non-
portable unixism like
16 matches
Mail list logo
