+1 they should be put there instead. where it currently is makes zero sense.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Mario Vukelic
mario.vuke...@dantian.org wrote:
On Mo, 2011-04-18 at 19:55 +0100, Luke Benstead wrote:
I think it's just there because there is nowhere else to put it.
Unity dedicates
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:21, Ryan Prior ryanpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another tiny detail that could improve the illusion is to remove the
window corner rounding for the seam between the two tiled windows,
making them look more like one unit.
Hi Thibaut,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 14:07, Thibaut Brandscheid randal...@web.de wrote:
Thanks for your mockup (and clever name!) -- I'll make sure
we discuss it during the UDS Lens session.
This would be s great :)
If you want you can add the mock-up to the wiki - just do with it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Liao wrote on 12/04/11 14:48:
Hi all,
I've been wondering, the Global Menu debate has been very furious for a
while now. Proponents argue that Fitts Law is efficient. However,
Unity's implementation of the Global Menu is that it becomes a
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 733349] Re: Natty: Unity launcher buttons should allow to
minimize apps, not just launch/restore
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 07:45:08 -
From: Michael 733...@bugs.launchpad.net
Reply-To: Bug 733349 733...@bugs.launchpad.net
It was my understanding that the launcher icons only represent apps, and
since an app can't really be minimized (only windows of that app), they
don't do it. It works with Gnome 2 because the list was a list of windows.
It would be clicking on a Gnome 2 shortcut and having the windows of that
What happens if you have a narrow window (GIMP, Empathy) stuck behind the
icons on the right? I think that's why Wingpanel's behavior was changed.
On Apr 18, 2011 10:25 PM, Mehdi Fattahi mah@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder why the launcher and the top panel overlap in unity. The logic
behind
Ian, I think you're right.
applications != windows
An application can have zero or more windows. I think the question here
is consistency:
If your application has just one window, when you click on the launcher
icon, this window will minimize. But if you have 3 opened windows to
that
I think this is not implemented beacuse the lack of consistency.
Most users will have just one window of each application opened at same
time. So, they will conclude that a click on launcher will minimize the
window. When they open two windows of the same application and click the
icon, the
On 19.04.2011 16:15, Marco Biscaro wrote:
(...)
An application can have zero or more windows. I think the question
here is consistency:
If your application has just one window, when you click on the
launcher icon, this window will minimize. But if you have 3 opened
windows to that
- Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com wrote:
It does. In the videos I watched of Charline Poirier's user test two
weeks ago, of the eight out of ten people who could find the hidden
menus at all, seven of them discovered the menus while mousing over the
close/minimize/unmaximize
Additionally, the Dash works exactly that way:
First click: show
Next click: hide
This works for all Dashes, the Ubuntu-Logo-Dash, the Applications-Dash
and the Files-and-Folders-Dash - why not for the other symbols on the
launcher?
So much for consistency.
On 19.04.2011 20:41, Jorge
Still more: all the indicators on the top right corner. You click one and it
shows, click again and it hides. And this is how it should be.
On 19 April 2011 21:12, Bazon bazonbl...@arcor.de wrote:
Additionally, the Dash works exactly that way:
First click: show
Next click: hide
This works
On Ter, 2011-04-19 at 21:17 +0100, Jorge Ortega wrote:
Still more: all the indicators on the top right corner. You click one
and it shows, click again and it hides. And this is how it should be.
On 19 April 2011 21:12, Bazon bazonbl...@arcor.de wrote:
Additionally, the Dash
Why does the global menu hide at all? Hiding it doesn't save a lot of
space, and it an can quite annoying.
-New users may have issues finding it
-A user may forgot an action like Edit - Copy if the Edit menu isn't a
visual reminder
-I frequently make an L-shape as I hit the top of the screen,
+1 on this... the menu should never be hidden. It's very difficult and
unintuitive to hide it. The window title should just push it over... even
the geniuses designing OS X do it like that.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Alexander Lancey a...@alexandos.orgwrote:
Why does the global menu
On 19 April 2011 19:26, Carl Simpson cwd.simp...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as I am aware, from memory, this was not done so that the
application's menus always start in the same place, thereby being
consistent, thereby making it quicker to find stuff.
With the ironic outcome that where with the
17 matches
Mail list logo
