-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jake Tolbert wrote on 16/06/10 05:05:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com
mailto:docto...@gmail.com wrote:
...
That is what you would get if you removed the ... from the bar when
they get resized.
I never
On 15 June 2010 08:10, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:08 +0100, Luke Benstead wrote:
Is there a reason why DockbarX is not suitable for this? I've attached
a screenshot incase people dunno what I'm talking about :)
That is what you would get if you removed
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:08 +0100, Luke Benstead wrote:
Is there a reason why DockbarX is not suitable for this? I've attached
a screenshot incase people dunno what I'm talking about :)
That is what you would get if you removed the ... from the bar when they
get resized.
I never understood
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:10 AM, Martin Owens docto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 14:08 +0100, Luke Benstead wrote:
Is there a reason why DockbarX is not suitable for this? I've attached
a screenshot incase people dunno what I'm talking about :)
That is what you would get if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luke Benstead wrote on 05/05/10 15:38:
I've been giving this a lot of thought recently, well actually, I've
been irritated into giving it thought after not being able to find my
Rhythmbox window. I've been trying to work out why we have minimize
I've been looking through some of the maemo stuff and it actually
looks pretty sexy. I've never used it in person so I apologize for my
arrogance :p
I'd just prefer android cus its more small screen friendly, although
as cellphones get larger oled screens ( :D )...
anyway whatever :p had to say
Android=Google
instantly forget...impossible...
And android is much better...or maybe you just wanted me to say that...
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
2010/5/14 David Hamm davidth...@gmail.com
Chat windows used to be one click away. This was one of the best
arguments against it until they made the tray.
http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2009/07/05/getting-the-message/
but you can still use the same argument, in that, gnome shell cannon't
With GNOME-Shell coming, arises problem of managing small windows
which you need to always have here at hand. The greatest problem are
chat windows. Yes, replying from the notification is good, but what if
you need to copy a link from Firefox, then return to a chat window and
paste it? Switch to
Chat windows used to be one click away. This was one of the best
arguments against it until they made the tray.
http://blogs.gnome.org/mccann/2009/07/05/getting-the-message/
but you can still use the same argument, in that, gnome shell cannon't
presume to know how all applications will work.
Jeremy Nickurak jer...@nickurak.ca wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 17:24, Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
That option is still there in GNOME 2.30 (as included in Lucid).
Nope.
Early gnomes had (IIRC) 3 options for what to show on the taskbar:
1) Show only windows from the current workspace
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 09:59 -0600, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
If i window is minizimed, I want it in the taskbar, period. Since it's
not visually on a desktop, and desktop ~= workspace, it can't be on
any workspace, so the only place it could live is the taskbar.
If you click the taskbar button of
I've been giving this a lot of thought recently, well actually, I've
been irritated into giving it thought after not being able to find my
Rhythmbox window. I've been trying to work out why we have minimize
to tray functionality at all and all I can come up with is that it is
because the
No, it is not time.
On 5 May 2010 16:38, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been giving this a lot of thought recently, well actually, I've
been irritated into giving it thought after not being able to find my
Rhythmbox window. I've been trying to work out why we have minimize
to
On 5 May 2010 15:42, Victor vm.kalbsk...@gmail.com wrote:
No, it is not time.
Care to elaborate?
Luke.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 16:38, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
In this situation
minimize to tray is:
a.) Effectively the same thing
b.) A pain to work with because now there are two possible places that
your window could be minimized to
Plus, a tray (or app-indicator) icon:
c.) Has
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
It's because of this shortage of space that I believe minimize to
tray exists. Minimize to tray is essentially I don't need this
window cluttering up my taskbar, but I need to leave it running and
the only reason I can
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jarlath Reidy jarlathre...@gmail.comwrote:
A better functioning taskbar would eliminate the need for yet another
desktop metaphor. There are too many on the desktop at the moment (double
click icons, oh-no, that's a toolbar shortcut, single click that one,
We pretty much already do all of this in Docky. Docky + panel mode is
basically the win7 jump list jawn.
--
--Alex Launi
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Alex Launi alex.la...@gmail.com wrote:
We pretty much already do all of this in Docky. Docky + panel mode is
basically the win7 jump list jawn.
--
--Alex Launi
I don't think there's support for the application being run to customize the
content of the list
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 21:06, Gavin Langdon puttabu...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally, it would increase the utility of standard window minimizing. Rather
than removing the application completely from the user's grasp when they
minimize it, it is simply taking up less space. The user does not need to
On 5 May 2010 20:06, Gavin Langdon puttabu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jarlath Reidy jarlathre...@gmail.com
wrote:
A better functioning taskbar would eliminate the need for yet another
desktop metaphor. There are too many on the desktop at the moment (double
click
One of my big reasons for using minimize-to-tray instead of regular minimize
is that the tray exists independantly of the workspaces you're on.
Minimizing to the task manager could work... but it would be critical to me
that the stickyness of an application is preserved on minimize, and this
is
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Gavin Langdon puttabu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think a standard shouldn't be adopted just because of the chance
that an application won't use it properly.
I agree with you. I mostly mean that the form of the standard may need to be
assertive in some areas,
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Jarlath Reidy jarlathre...@gmail.comwrote:
I agree with you. I mostly mean that the form of the standard may need to
be assertive in some areas, for example as the current indicator area does
by not providing the applications tooltips.
Yes, this makes plenty
Op woensdag 05-05-2010 om 15:18 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Jeremy
Nickurak:
Another angle to this is whether minimized applications should actually
exist on any workspace in general. To me, the workspace does not include the
panel... the panel itself is sticky. Therefore, things in the panel
What's the point of the tear-off functionality? If torn what happens on
hover then?
--
--Alex Launi
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help :
What's the point of the tear-off functionality? If torn what happens on
hover then?
It was a secondary thought--this could be a more-integrated and more ideal
way to use gadgets/widgets. Basically they'd act as small versions of the
apps for when the app is otherwise minimized. You could do a
Op woensdag 05-05-2010 om 15:38 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Luke
Benstead:
I've been giving this a lot of thought recently, well actually, I've
been irritated into giving it thought after not being able to find my
Rhythmbox window. I've been trying to work out why we have minimize
to tray
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 17:24, Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
That option is still there in GNOME 2.30 (as included in Lucid).
Nope.
Early gnomes had (IIRC) 3 options for what to show on the taskbar:
1) Show only windows from the current workspace
2) Show windows from the current workspace,
30 matches
Mail list logo
