On 06/07/10 08:49, Philipp Wendler wrote:
Hi,
Am 06.07.2010 08:41, schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:
Interesting questions. My gut feel would be:
- incoming IM notifications would be suppressed
- incoming calls would be displayed
Why the latter? When I put my cellphone in DND (or
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:55 +0200, Philipp Wendler wrote:
But the point is, it behaves similarly for phone calls and for IM (the
latter also lead to vibration and screen message).
From my personal use of the phone, I don't see how this would be
desirable. For example, I routinely set the
On 06/07/10 02:09, Frederik Nnaji wrote:
Or will it have effect for social communication also?
How about incoming voice and video calls?
Do Not Disturb should be a system-exlusive mode?
Interesting questions. My gut feel would be:
- incoming IM notifications would be suppressed
- incoming
Hi,
Am 06.07.2010 08:41, schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:
Interesting questions. My gut feel would be:
- incoming IM notifications would be suppressed
- incoming calls would be displayed
Why the latter? When I put my cellphone in DND (or silence) mode,
nothing is signaled: no calls, no SMS, no
Hi there ;)
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 15:14, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Do-not-disturb did come up in our latest review of thinking for 11.04
design work, so please ask MPT for a pointer to the (placeholder) spec
where it should emerge. I would guess it would be a me-menu-2.0 type
On 18/06/10 13:18, Frederik Nnaji wrote:
On 2010-06-18, Vishnoo v...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:34 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
On 31/03/10 18:51, Jim Rorie wrote:
From a bigger picture frame of reference, I was mulling a global do
no disturb state. This
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 23:34 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
On 31/03/10 18:51, Jim Rorie wrote:
From a bigger picture frame of reference, I was mulling a global do
no disturb state. This would turn off desktop notifications and other
intrusions.
Do-Not-Disturb should *definitely* be in
Dani, though I agree that consistency is important, you should keep in
mind that the two concepts involved here are semantically different. In
the messaging menu the arrow means running while in the me menu the
point means selected.
The most important difference between the two is that *more
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 16:42, Conscious User consciousu...@aol.com wrote:
Dani, though I agree that consistency is important, you should keep in
mind that the two concepts involved here are semantically different. In
the messaging menu the arrow means running while in the me menu the
point
Le mercredi 31 mars 2010 à 12:31 -0400, Alex Launi a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Conscious User
consciousu...@aol.com wrote:
The problem is that everything you said above does not apply
to
anything other than IM, at least not for the moment. There's
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:23 -0400, Alex Launi wrote:
I'm sure I missed some cases, and empirical results will find places
that need tweaking, but I think it's a decent start to a higher level
of presence integration into the desktop
From a bigger picture frame of reference, I was mulling a
I think the busy state is a good one for this case, busy means I'm working-
don't interrupt me unless it's urgent so while you'd still be online via
empathy, there would be no notification it would just silently go into the
messaging menu until you are no longer busy and can receive the message
On 31/03/10 18:51, Jim Rorie wrote:
From a bigger picture frame of reference, I was mulling a global do
no disturb state. This would turn off desktop notifications and other
intrusions.
Do-Not-Disturb should *definitely* be in the spec for 10.10. Please do
review them post-UDS and raise a flag
13 matches
Mail list logo
