Re: [Babel-users] Open-Mesh migration, 802.11s, babeld, speed degradation

2019-03-05 Thread Stuart Trusty
Hi Juliusz, Yes, I can see your point. However, I am just using 802.11s for the LAN traffic to gateways. Some of these 802.11s devices may themselves be gateways. Their own gateway may only be good as a fallback gateway for rest of the mesh, and just making a gateway node force a client's DHCP

Re: [Babel-users] Open-Mesh migration, 802.11s, babeld, speed degradation

2019-03-05 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> Yes, in this situation all neighbor stations enumerate. Everyone can ping > everyone via 802.11s mesh. You're running Babel over an 802.11s mesh? Why? Both Babel and 802.11s are routing protocols (more exactly, 802.11s contains a routing protocol). Running both in the same mesh is

Re: [Babel-users] Open-Mesh migration, 802.11s, babeld, speed degradation

2019-03-03 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Hi Stuart, > I would much rather use babeld, and I had set it up with the default > settings from OpenWRT, but the radios fell off the net (not a logfile > issue). What do you mean they "fell off the net"? Is the link layer associating? Please run "iw dev wlan0 station dump" on each of the

[Babel-users] Open-Mesh migration, 802.11s, babeld, speed degradation

2019-03-03 Thread Stuart Trusty
Greetings all, After being purchased by Datto, after closing their source and demanding money every month to use their formerly GPL radios, Cloudtrax committed some form of suicide, and corrupted all of our SSID's and we had to make an emergency migration in our small town in India. Our