Re: [Babel-users] babelctl?

2012-08-31 Thread Gabriel Kerneis
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 12:23:11AM -0400, anarcat wrote: On 2012-08-10, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Yep, although that's not really meant for human consumption -- it's the interface BabelDraw[1] and BabelWeb[2] listen on. I suppose it could be extended for the kind of applications you

Re: [Babel-users] babelctl?

2012-08-31 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Well, for one thing it would be more reliable to have a unix socket instead of a network port. A Unix socket cannot easily be tunnelled using ssh or socat. Also, the output is not easy to parse as it is right now. First off, there is no delimitation that allows us to see when a listing is

[Babel-users] how to reach non-babel router from babel node?

2012-08-31 Thread err404
Dear all I play with babel 1.3.1-1 on debian. I put babeld on some computers, and also in lxc containers. two computers have both wired and wifi link. I add on /etc/babeld.conf: redistribute proto 3 allow redistribute proto 11 allow I modify /etc/sysctl.conf to enable ip forwarding on all

Re: [Babel-users] babelctl?

2012-08-31 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Antoine Beaupré anar...@anarcat.ath.cx wrote: On 2012-08-31, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Second, the fields display is inconsistent. The chan (255) field, for example, is sometimes there, sometimes not... The format is extensible, and in principle all fields