Re: [Babel-users] Fwd: Why we switched to Babel

2015-08-08 Thread Saverio Proto
So why they switched to babel ? babel makes some magic with MTU ? I dont see the end of the story. Il 08/ago/2015 04:47, Jenny Ryan tunabana...@gmail.com ha scritto: -- Forwarded message -- From: Marc Juul j...@labitat.dk Date: Aug 6, 2015 9:58 AM Subject: Why we switched to

Re: [Babel-users] Fwd: Why we switched to Babel

2015-08-08 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Marc, Jenny, thanks for the detailed explanation. There was another reason: In batman-adv the MAC address is the identifier used for each device. It is possible to configure many devices to randomize their MAC address but it needs the user to do something, so most people will never know to do

Re: [Babel-users] Fwd: Why we switched to Babel

2015-08-08 Thread Saverio Proto
Thanks for clarify :) The initial email was confusing. I hope to be again at the battlemesh next year. Have fun and send my greetings to all. Saverio Il 08/ago/2015 13:17, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr ha scritto: Hi Saverio, long time no hear. Pity you're not here. So

Re: [Babel-users] Fwd: Why we switched to Babel

2015-08-08 Thread Mitar
Hi! On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr wrote: 1. BATMAN adds 32 octets of overhead to every frame; 2. BATMAN requires the same MTU on all segments. Are you sure about 2.? To my understanding, Batman simply fragments packets in that case? So it

Re: [Babel-users] Fwd: Why we switched to Babel

2015-08-08 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
Are you sure about 2.? I frankly have no idea -- it's merely my reading of Marc's e-mail. Marc, could you either confirm or infirm? -- Juliusz ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org