Mitar,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:02:56PM +0200, Mitar wrote:
you discover that some part of your lab is not covered by your mesh
network, just take another Fonera, flash it with a customized image
(featuring babel and ahcpd in client mode), plug it near the dead
zone, and it works!
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
So that it can get an IP and be reachable via ssh for administration
purposes
Then all your nodes have the same SSH password/key? Or how do you know
which one is on which IP? And how do you know when first
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:44:35AM -0400, Outback Dingo wrote:
well my netbook runs openwrt :) has babel on it, so ur saying i can install
ahcpd in client mode there also ?
Yes indeed, follow the how-to, it should be straightforward.
and does ahcpd support multiple network configurations?
It
To every Ahcpd/OpenWrt user,
I just realised that the init script was totally broken in server mode.
This is now fixed in r21644. Since nobody reported it, I guess nobody
was using it, for whatever reason. Anyway, here is a quick how-to. I
hope it might help some of you to setup their own ahcp
Hi!
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
Choose one of your stations to act as an ahcpd server.
What happens if there is a network split?
Mitar
___
Babel-users mailing list
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:55:27PM +0200, Mitar wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr
wrote:
Choose one of your stations to act as an ahcpd server.
What happens if there is a network split?
You ought to be on the good half of the split ;-)
More
Hi!
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr wrote:
More seriously, you can have as many servers as you like, but be aware
that:
1° the client will pick ONE server (the closest) and get every
information from it. Consequence: you cannot use one server to
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:41:43PM +0200, Mitar wrote:
OK. But what is then difference with running a dnsmasq on every node
with DHCP where every node has its own IPv4 pool for clients? dnsmasq
does not yet support IPv6 but is this then the only difference?
Off the the top of my head:
- IPv6
8 matches
Mail list logo
