Hi!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
> In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via
> nodewatcher, I finally scrolled down to the chart next to the very
> bottom to find rtt measurements.
Oh, there is even more, but we do not display
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Or we have a very short buffer. ;-)
>
> You certainly know how to tweak me!
In fact, we do not yet have anything like that configured, I was just
teasing. ;-)
But maybe upstream ISPs have.
> Do you have something
> In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via
> nodewatcher,
Yes, it's pretty amazing.
> so are you really seeing real-world peaks in the 7 second range or is
> that an artifact of something else?
Looking from 4 hops away, I'm seeing a reasonable amount of route
I tend to fork convos, sorry.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Mitar wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek
> wrote:
>> I'd like more evidence that this is needed. Estimating packet loss is
>> very slow (since
In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via
nodewatcher, I finally scrolled down to the chart next to the very
bottom to find rtt measurements.
so are you really seeing real-world peaks in the 7 second range or is
that an artifact of something else?
zoomed in:
5 matches
Mail list logo