Re: [Babel-users] latency in WLAN-SI

2015-12-16 Thread Mitar
Hi! On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via > nodewatcher, I finally scrolled down to the chart next to the very > bottom to find rtt measurements. Oh, there is even more, but we do not display

Re: [Babel-users] latency in WLAN-SI

2015-12-16 Thread Mitar
Hi! On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >> Or we have a very short buffer. ;-) > > You certainly know how to tweak me! In fact, we do not yet have anything like that configured, I was just teasing. ;-) But maybe upstream ISPs have. > Do you have something

Re: [Babel-users] latency in WLAN-SI

2015-12-15 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via > nodewatcher, Yes, it's pretty amazing. > so are you really seeing real-world peaks in the 7 second range or is > that an artifact of something else? Looking from 4 hops away, I'm seeing a reasonable amount of route

[Babel-users] latency in WLAN-SI

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Taht
I tend to fork convos, sorry. On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Mitar wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek > wrote: >> I'd like more evidence that this is needed. Estimating packet loss is >> very slow (since

Re: [Babel-users] latency in WLAN-SI

2015-12-15 Thread Dave Taht
In pouring through the astonishing *wealth* of data available via nodewatcher, I finally scrolled down to the chart next to the very bottom to find rtt measurements. so are you really seeing real-world peaks in the 7 second range or is that an artifact of something else? zoomed in: