Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthieu Boutier wrote: >> Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask what's a reliable way to >> detect IPv6_SUBTREES? > > Yes, I'm asking myself if the Dave's "invalid argument" are for > source-specific routes. In which

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Matthieu Boutier wrote: >> I put a babel debug 3 log up at: >> >> http://www.taht.net/~d/babeld_pi3.log > > Strange, there is no more "kernel_route(ADD): invalid argument" lines. Is it > really the same node, with the same

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Matthieu Boutier
> Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask what's a reliable way to > detect IPv6_SUBTREES? Yes, I'm asking myself if the Dave's "invalid argument" are for source-specific routes. In which case it answers the question. Will test it. Matthieu

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Matthieu Boutier
> I put a babel debug 3 log up at: > > http://www.taht.net/~d/babeld_pi3.log Strange, there is no more "kernel_route(ADD): invalid argument" lines. Is it really the same node, with the same options ? So you should have all the right routes in the FIB, no ? Matthieu PS: sorry for your flash

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> "Autodetection" is just based on the kernel version (via uname). So > it's normal it doesn't change anything on c1 (3.10 < 3.11). And it's > normal too that you need to use it on c2 (3.14 > 3.11, but compiled > without IPv6_SUBTREES). Matthieu, Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-28 Thread Matthieu Boutier
> It did not fix the 3.10 kernel based c1. > > So autodetection is broken on the c2 & c1 kernels "Autodetection" is just based on the kernel version (via uname). So it's normal it doesn't change anything on c1 (3.10 < 3.11). And it's normal too that you need to use it on c2 (3.14 > 3.11, but

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-26 Thread Dave Taht
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Matthieu Boutier wrote: >> I checked and IPV6_SUBTREES is disabled in the raspbian kernel >> build. I filed a bug. > > Good to know. What if you specify explicitly to babeld not to use subtrees: > > ipv6-subtrees false

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-25 Thread Dave Taht
So I set up ipv6-subtrees false for the pi3 also, did get rules, still got kernel errors. Turned off the internal wifi (so it's no longer trying to be a router), but it is still getting kernel errors from the traffic on the ethernet interface, so I suspect that ipv6 support on the pi has, until

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-24 Thread Dave Taht
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I wish I lived in a world where more of the weird things "just worked" > > You'd be bored. Ha. At least compiling stuff on these boxes is slow enough to get in a song or two on the piano. Filed a bug

Re: [Babel-users] Babel on itty bitty boxes

2016-03-24 Thread Dave Taht
and I filed this bug too. https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1371 I wish I lived in a world where more of the weird things "just worked" ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org