On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Matthieu Boutier
wrote:
>> Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask what's a reliable way to
>> detect IPv6_SUBTREES?
>
> Yes, I'm asking myself if the Dave's "invalid argument" are for
> source-specific routes. In which
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Matthieu Boutier
wrote:
>> I put a babel debug 3 log up at:
>>
>> http://www.taht.net/~d/babeld_pi3.log
>
> Strange, there is no more "kernel_route(ADD): invalid argument" lines. Is it
> really the same node, with the same
> Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask what's a reliable way to
> detect IPv6_SUBTREES?
Yes, I'm asking myself if the Dave's "invalid argument" are for source-specific
routes. In which case it answers the question. Will test it.
Matthieu
> I put a babel debug 3 log up at:
>
> http://www.taht.net/~d/babeld_pi3.log
Strange, there is no more "kernel_route(ADD): invalid argument" lines. Is it
really the same node, with the same options ?
So you should have all the right routes in the FIB, no ?
Matthieu
PS: sorry for your flash
> "Autodetection" is just based on the kernel version (via uname). So
> it's normal it doesn't change anything on c1 (3.10 < 3.11). And it's
> normal too that you need to use it on c2 (3.14 > 3.11, but compiled
> without IPv6_SUBTREES).
Matthieu,
Why don't you write to the netdev list to ask
> It did not fix the 3.10 kernel based c1.
>
> So autodetection is broken on the c2 & c1 kernels
"Autodetection" is just based on the kernel version (via uname). So it's
normal it doesn't change anything on c1 (3.10 < 3.11). And it's normal too
that you need to use it on c2 (3.14 > 3.11, but
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Matthieu Boutier
wrote:
>> I checked and IPV6_SUBTREES is disabled in the raspbian kernel
>> build. I filed a bug.
>
> Good to know. What if you specify explicitly to babeld not to use subtrees:
>
> ipv6-subtrees false
So I set up ipv6-subtrees false for the pi3 also, did get rules, still
got kernel errors.
Turned off the internal wifi (so it's no longer trying to be a
router), but it is still getting kernel errors from the traffic on the
ethernet interface, so I suspect that ipv6 support on the pi has,
until
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek
wrote:
>> I wish I lived in a world where more of the weird things "just worked"
>
> You'd be bored.
Ha. At least compiling stuff on these boxes is slow enough to get in a
song or two on the piano.
Filed a bug
and I filed this bug too.
https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1371
I wish I lived in a world where more of the weird things "just worked"
___
Babel-users mailing list
Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
10 matches
Mail list logo