Re: [Babel-users] ANNOUNCE: babeld-1.4.0

2013-05-04 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On Friday 03 May 2013 22:07:29 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: * INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE: the local interface now announces the local hostname, and marks the end of the initial route dump. (Thanks to Gabriel Kerneis.) But it should be ok to have mixed netwroks of 1.3 or 1.4 babeld as this

Re: [Babel-users] ANNOUNCE: babeld-1.3.6

2013-05-02 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Added in gentoo eigenlay overlay http://gitorious.org/eigennet/eigenlay/commit/60b003a450a3f1cce4206840653a741dfc8056b2 ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Re: [Babel-users] [PATCH] Ignore IPv6 routing cache on linux

2013-04-24 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 18:45:27 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Question -- is this serious enough to warrant another 1.3 branch release? How many people are seeing this? A lot! All babel nodes in Ninux Italia!! ___ Babel-users mailing list

Re: [Babel-users] [PATCH] Ignore IPv6 routing cache on linux

2013-04-24 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 21:13:47 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Gioacchino, can you confirm Baptiste's patch fixes the issue? it is a bit difficult to test it for me now :| ___ Babel-users mailing list Babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Babel-users] Buggy routes exported by babeld

2013-04-22 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
I can reproduce a similar but not identical bug because my filter are defferent gioacchino@G10h4ckLab ~ $ ip -6 route show ... ... 2001:470:c8f7:ee:ee:15:6d7b:4d21 via fe80::7825:ddff:fe9d:4643 dev isole proto 42 metric 1024 2001:470:c8f7:ee:ee:15:6d7d:9e9 via fe80::7825:ddff:fe9d:4643 dev

Re: [Babel-users] ANNOUNCE: babeld-1.3.5

2013-04-12 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On Friday 12 April 2013 23:14:16 Gabriel Kerneis wrote: On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 09:59:43PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Version 1.3.5 of the Babel Routing daemon is available in OpenWrt r36330 https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/36330. in Gentoo

[Babel-users] Babeld Team ID ( AS number like )

2013-03-20 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hi all! We are experimenting to use babeld as routing protocol for the VPN to join the community networks in italy It seems works very fine but we encountered a problem in the interoperability with other routing protocols like olsrd Clauz from ninux developed an olsr plugin that automatically

Re: [Babel-users] Babeld Team ID ( AS number like )

2013-03-20 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On Wednesday 20 March 2013 11:09:12 Gabriel Kerneis wrote: This would require extending the protocol to send team-id in addition to router-id. So this mean a major change :| Since you are assigning your router ids manually anyway, another idea requiring only minimal changes might be to add

[Babel-users] Node address not distributed

2013-03-20 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
In my network the node BitArno has: BitArno ~ # cat /etc/babeld/babeld.conf | wgetpaste Your paste can be seen here: http://bpaste.net/show/85167/ BitArno ~ # ip address show | wgetpaste Your paste can be seen here: http://bpaste.net/show/85168/ BitArno ~ # ip route show | wgetpaste Your paste

Re: [Babel-users] Babeld dirty routing table

2013-01-08 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On 01/07/13 19:48, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Gioacchino, I strongly suspect we're mis-interpreting the results here, something like interpreting Linux route cache as actual routes. So `ip route show` is showing the entire routing cache and not only the real table, maybe we should open a bug to

Re: [Babel-users] 1.4 changelog

2013-01-08 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Thanks! On 01/07/13 19:53, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: What change between 1.3.4 and 1.4 ? The main new feature is an algorithm for improving route stability (decreasing flapping). It's been reported to work quite well, and will be enabled by default. There are some other minor tweaks

Re: [Babel-users] Babeld dirty routing table

2012-12-13 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
On 12/13/12 21:34, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: Babeld 1.3.4 is dirtying routing table on our servers we can see the same destination as reacheable and unreacheable too I've seen that happen when two babeld processes are running at the same time. Normally, /var/log/babeld.pid protects against

[Babel-users] Babeld doesn't cleanup unreacheable route before stopping

2012-12-11 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Stopping babeld 1.3.4 I was expecting it clean up the routing table before stopping, but it is not happening here you can see what happen - The routing table while babeld is running - zefiro ~ # ip -6 route show 2001:470:c8f7:ee:: via fe80::f4fa:7bff:fe8e:df20 dev babeld proto

[Babel-users] Babeld dirty routing table

2012-12-11 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hi all! Babeld 1.3.4 is dirtying routing table on our servers we can see the same destination as reacheable and unreacheable too babel config and routing table on zefiro http://bpaste.net/show/63858/ http://bpaste.net/show/63852/ http://bpaste.net/show/63855/ babel config and routing table on

[Babel-users] babel complain about channel on interface

2012-11-12 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hi! Babeld 1.3.4 doesn't like channel interfering in configuration here is my conf file in le 14 ip 0.0.0.0/0 deny in eq 15 ip 10.174.0.0/15 deny in ip 131.114.0.0/16 deny in ip 2001:1418:1a9:eeab::/64 deny redistribute local ip 131.114.0.0/16 deny redistribute if eth0 deny redistribute deny

Re: [Babel-users] multicast packet loss

2012-08-06 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
to understand what is happening... I am going to do some test as ordex said trying to make things clear On 08/06/2012 03:43 PM, Antonio Quartulli wrote: On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:05:49PM +0200, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: Hi all! I am experiencing a multicast packet loss on batman-adv mesh, this can

Re: [Babel-users] Babel Multicast routing

2011-03-01 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Same goes for multicast -- I see no reason why multicast routing should be linked to a particular unicast routing protocol, and intend to work on a more general solution. Yes this seems the good approach Don't hold your breath, though, my main priority right now is to finish publishing the Babel

Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git

2011-03-01 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Git! Git! Git! Git! Git! 2011/3/1 Juliusz Chroboczek j...@pps.jussieu.fr: To stir things even more: why not Mercurial? ;-) Git is an infuriating piece of software, but with a great ecosystem. Darcs is a great piece of software, but with no ecosystem to speak about. Mercurial has the

[Babel-users] mv from darcs to git

2011-02-28 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hi all ! I have ported latest babelz repository to git with full history you can find it here [0] The problem with darcs is that it have less supports than git and in fact is impossible to package software from darcs for openwrt... Can you use git now? I have done the big effort to convert darcs

Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git

2011-02-28 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
...@pps.jussieu.fr: Hi, On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:49:17PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: The problem with darcs is that it have less supports than git and in fact is impossible to package software from darcs for openwrt... You must be kidding: I added support for darcs repositories to OpenWrt 4

Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git

2011-02-28 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
-eigennet/Makefile 2011/2/28 Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: I have tried to do a babelz package form darcs but i obtain unkown source protocol or similar, moreover it seems you are to forced to use As explained

Re: [Babel-users] mv from darcs to git

2011-02-28 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
] Error 2 [0] http://gitorious.org/eigennet/packages/blobs/babel/babeld-eigennet/Makefile 2011/2/28 Gabriel Kerneis kern...@pps.jussieu.fr: On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:21:33PM +0100, Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: As explained in the commit message I linked, you must use http protocol, not darcs:// (which

[Babel-users] Babel Multicast routing

2011-02-27 Thread Gioacchino Mazzurco
Hi! In our mesh network Ninux Pisa we are planning to switch from olsrd to babelz because have a lot of advantage, the only problem with babel is that we do intensive use of mdns ( zeroconf ) protocol that need multicast routing, olsrd dosn't support fully multicast routing but have a plugin for