Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Even soical conservatives beleive in gender equality, race equality, etc. The social liberal - social conservative divide tends to be on issues such as abortion, gay rights, drugs, sex, etc. From: Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No social conservative I know is for sexism, racism, slavery, segreation, etc. you imply that you associate with the term social conservative. From: Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Sent:

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv Socially liberal, but morally conservative? I suspect that socially liberal means feeling strongly about social justice or social welfare and being ok with

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Social conservatism is a political or moral ideology that believes that government has a role in encouraging or enforcing what they consider traditional values or behaviors. A second meaning of the term social conservatism developed in the Nordic countries and

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No. that's called fiscal liberalism / economic liberalism. Look at the Nolan Chart. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nolan_Chart http://freedomkeys.com/nolancharts.htm http://www.quiz2d.com/ http://www.freedomkeys.com/whoshould4.htm#quiz http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz

An Introdution to Baha'i Law by Udo Schaefer

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv http://www.scribd.com/doc/21023921/An-Introduction-to-Bahai-Law Udo Schaefer's eassy on Baha'i law. Also, he says Baha'i laws will become actual laws. He also for some reason blames the breadown of morality on individualism. Collevtism-communitarianism are assumed

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv No social conservative I know is for sexism, racism, slavery, segreation, etc. you imply that you associate with the term social conservative. It's a matter of

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv They don't oppose the goals as they oppose the means. Christian Reconstructionists want salvery, but on a race neutral slavery. Rand Paul believes that the free market rather than gov't should punish discriminators. This is more of the economic-fiscal scale rather

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No. that's called fiscal liberalism / economic liberalism. Look at the Nolan Chart. http://freedomkeys.com/nolancharts.htm I reccomedn taking several to be sure of positions. Results may vary depending on questions and terms. Note sometime social is interchanged

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv But isn't the relevant question: what did Susan actually mean when she said: I would say that we are socially liberal but morally conservative. Instead of reading through half a dozen sites on politics which may or may not use terminology the same way, wouldn't it make

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 29 Nov 2010 at 8:17, Stephen Gray wrote: Social conservatism is a political or moral ideology that believes that government has a role in encouraging or enforcing what they consider traditional values or behaviors. ... Is the Baha'i Faith socially liberal on

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv They don't oppose the goals as they oppose the means. Christian Reconstructionists want salvery, but on a race neutral slavery. You didn't say anything about

Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Political terms are a language all their own. You have left (liberalism, new labour), right (conservatism, paleo consevatism), up (classical liberalism, libertarianism, anarcho syndicalism), and down (socialism, communism, populism, authoritarianism,

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv http://www.scribd.com/doc/21023921/An-Introduction-to-Bahai-Law Udo Shaefer implies Baha'i law mandates that it becomes the law of the land. He is emphatic on sexual laws. He says that the fines on illegal sex even between consenting heterosexual adults will cause

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Those are the way Americans have been using the terms from the 70s (or even before) till today. Some prefer the moralistic (social conservatism) vs tolerant (social liberalism) dichomotmy. There also the market (economic/fiscal conservatism) vs social

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Even soical conservatives beleive in gender equality, race equality, etc. Often they do not. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No social conservative I know is for sexism, racism, slavery, segreation, etc. you imply that you associate with the term social conservative. Come down here to Mississippi, I'll introduce you to some. __ You are

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I suspect that socially liberal means feeling strongly about social justice or social welfare and being ok with collective and/or government measures to remedy problems in this area (progressive taxes, social security, food stamps, etc.) while morally conservative

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Look at the Nolan Chart. I'm not inclined to let libertarians like David Nolan define my beliefs. __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a blank email to

Re: Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The terms 'right' and 'left' in political jargon (I've never heard of up and down) are derived from the seating arrangements of the Estates General on the eve of the French Revolution. High churchmen and members of the nobility were seated on the right whereas the

Re: Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Adib Masumian
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I believe that in the context of the political diamond, up refers to progressiveness while down denotes authoritarianism. Sent from my iPhone On Nov 29, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv The terms 'right' and

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Udo Shaefer was a prosecuting attorney in Germany for most of his life. His main objection to Protestantism was that it is too soft on crime. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Stephen Gray skg_z...@yahoo.com wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv So you're saying Susan favors a moralistic social (insert type of govt). I'll go out on a limb and say oligarchy, maybe republic. Uh, no. An oligarchy presumes that actions are taken in interest of the elites. Social liberalism supports the common people.

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No, I meant democracy as rule by the people. Republic as rule by elected representatvies. Oligarchy is that but with the representatives as a de-facto ruling class. http://www.friesian.com/quiz.htm Your guesstimate quiz results. Examples of societeis scores: Athens

Re: Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv It is only those who do not understand our people, who believe our national life is entirely absorbed by material motives. We make no concealment of the fact that we want wealth, but there are many other things we want much more. We want peace and honor, and that

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Are you more comfortable in the liberal quadrant or the authoritarian one? http://quiz2d.com/quiz/Radical_Liberal.php http://quiz2d.com/quiz/Economic_Liberal.php http://quiz2d.com/quiz/Authoritarian.php http://quiz2d.com/quiz/Totalitarian.php

Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv On 29 Nov 2010 at 9:46, Stephen Gray wrote: The Baha'i Studies Listserv http://www.scribd.com/doc/21023921/An-Introduction-to-Bahai-Law Udo Shaefer implies Baha'i law mandates that it becomes the law of the land. I think you are misreading him. He says the laws

A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Tim Nolan
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I  recently participated in a discussion about Muhammad. One person in the discussion stated over and over that Muhammad was immoral because he married a girl aged 6, and had intimate relations with her when she was only 9. This particular person in the discussion was 

Re: {Spam?} A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Sen Sonja
The Baha'i Studies Listserv One start is to gather the various traditions, which disagree about the age of Aisha when she was married. I discuss two of them on my blog here: http://senmcglinn.wordpress.com/email-archive/the-age-of-aisha/ but I know there are others. These two happen to come

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv http://misconceptions-about-islam.com/ This is a good defense of Islam website. http://misconceptions-about-islam.com/muhammad-married-young-girl.htm This is the article about Aisha/Ayesha. http://www.quranicteachings.co.uk/ayeshas-age.htm

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Jahilliyya       Before Revelation     First Revelation     610 CE     Abu Baker accepts Islam 

Re: Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv It is only those who do not understand our people, who believe our national life is entirely absorbed by material motives. We make no concealment of the fact that we want wealth, but there are many other things we want much more. We want peace and honor, and that

Re: Defining the Terms Left, Rights Up, and Down

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Are you referring to his Presidency, before, or after? He said that quote for the Barry Golwater nomination. From: Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 3:15:37 PM

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv No, I meant democracy as rule by the people. Republic as rule by elected representatvies. Oligarchy is that but with the representatives as a de-facto ruling class. Your definition of oligarchy makes no sense to me, but certainly our country is a Republic and not

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I  recently participated in a discussion about Muhammad. One person in the discussion stated over and over that Muhammad was immoral because he married a girl aged 6, and had intimate relations with her when she was only 9. I would agree that Stephen's chronology

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The most thoughtful discussion I've seen on the topic is: The Young Marriage of cAishah: Mother of the Believers by Abû Imân cAbd ar-Rahmân Robert Squires http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Polemics/aishah.html The article makes a number of points and I'd encourage

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The article makes a number of points and I'd encourage you to read it. The big point is that early marriages were normal for much of pre-modern history and that even enemies and critics of Islam in the past were unfazed by the marriage of Muhammad (saaws) and Aishah

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Oligarchy means rule by gruop. It's like a monarchy, but several rulers instead of one. It's means rule by oligarchs regardless of if they are elist or non-elist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Oligarchy means rule by gruop. It's like a monarchy, but several rulers instead of one. It's means rule by oligarchs regardless of if they are elist or non-elist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy Uh, that's not what wiki says: The oligarchy (from Greek

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Military dictatorship/junta can be an example of non-elist oligarchy From: Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com To: Baha'i Studies bahai-st@list.jccc.edu Sent: Mon, November 29, 2010 4:10:38 PM Subject: Re: Grave Influence The Baha'i

Re: Grave Influence

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv It seems like you are arguing about things which really aren't hard and fast issues. On the one hand, if you have a small group of people in society who have all or most of the political power (i.e. an oligarchy) then you could definitely argue that they are, by

Surah 36 (Ya Sin)

2010-11-29 Thread Stephen Gray
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I've heard that in some hadiths surah 36 is reffered to as the heart of the Quran. Any reason why? What is this particular surah's message? __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as:

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Iskandar Hai, M.D.
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Reference, please. On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Susan Maneck sman...@gmail.com wrote: Maimonides held that 3 was the permissible marriage age. __ __ You are

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv I found the following blog which gives references http://rabbimichaelsamuel.com/wisdom/jewish-sexual-ethics/ But the emphasis seems to be in an odd place. I mean, it seems to be saying that sex doesn't even count as sex before 3. (If she is younger than that, (less

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Gilberto Simpson
The Baha'i Studies Listserv The clearest statement I could find is in the Talmud A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by coition, and if her deceased husband's brother cohabits with her, she becomes his. The larger context is:

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Reference, please. . Maimonides did not support child marriages, he merely acknowledged they were permissible according to the Talmud. I can'f find an electronic version of his statement, but here's a website that speaks of it:

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Now that I think about it, I wonder if the cutoff is age three here because of the earlier story of Rebecca and Isaac? __ You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:arch...@mail-archive.com Unsubscribe: send a

Re: A Question About Muhammad's Wives

2010-11-29 Thread Susan Maneck
The Baha'i Studies Listserv Now that I think about it, I wonder if the cutoff is age three here because of the earlier story of Rebecca and Isaac? I was thinking the same thing. We know some Muslims justify marrying young girls on the basis of Muhammad's marriage to Aisha.