I agree with the feeling that education for all should mean
free education.
Dear Loic,
The thing is that the Aqdas doesn't talk about free education for all,
it talks about free education for those who can't afford it. But
ordinarily, according to the Aqdas the father is responsible for
This means that
free and obligatory education would cause people freedom to choose
their academic plan,
Dear Hasan,
I don't get the impression from the Writings that education will
necessarily be free. In fact the Aqdas requires a father educate his
children and only if he cannot afford
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:This means that
free and obligatory education would cause people freedom to choose
their academic plan,
Dear Hasan,
I don't get the impression from the Writings that education will
necessarily be free. In fact the Aqdas requires a father educate his
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: This means that
free and obligatory education would cause people freedom to choose
their academic plan,
Dear Hasan,
I don't get the impression from the Writings that education will
necessarily be free. In fact the Aqdas requires a father educate his
Well, how obligatory education is obligatory if it is not free?
Dear Hasan,
It is obligatory because the Aqdas requires a father to educate his
son. If the father fails to do so the House of Justice has the right
to take the money from the father. If he cannot afford it, then the
House of