On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:22:45 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
El dom, 11-01-2009 a las 15:16 +0200, Ville Skyttä escribió:
When adding completions for new, generally available commands, is it
preferred to inline them in bash_completion or to add new files to contrib/?
I gather there's a
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:16:51 +0100, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
Hi all,
Hello Santiago, hello all,
Based on the current aproach on Gentoo and on comments from other
distros, I'd like to propose a new directory layout for bash-completion.
Ok, let's see :-)
El lun, 12-01-2009 a las 23:55 +0100,
Santiago M. Mola a écrit :
Hi,
Let's review some patches.
El lun, 12-01-2009 a las 23:55 +0100, Guillaume Rousse escribió:
Second, I'd prefer all potentially slow completion (rpm database
querying, scp remote completion) to be easily desactivable. For those
reason, we patch openssh and
Hello Chris,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:33:29 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Hi.
Completion of package names seems to be broken at least (!!) when I do
the following:
dpkg -L or dpkg -S does not find base-passwd at all?!
Well, dpkg -S isn't meant to complete on package names. From
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#bash-completion (200811xx) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fixed completion of environment variables, thanks to Morita Sho
#(Closes: #272660)
# * Fix dpkg completion bug: it listed only non-Essential packages
#(Closes: #511790)
#
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 21:23 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Well, dpkg -S isn't meant to complete on package names. From man dpkg:
-S, --search filename-search-pattern...
Search for a filename from installed packages.
So you should really give a pattern there.
Hello Chris,
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:32:20 +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
When completing hosts listed in known hosts files from ssh (and
perhaps from other locations like /etc/hosts, too) also includes hosts
that are commented like:
#do.not.use.this.host.example.com
Fixed, also
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#bash-completion (200811xx) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Allow for comments in known_hosts files (Closes: #511789)
# * README updated: explain how to use bash-completion correctly.
#(Closes: #506560)
#
package bash-completion
Ignoring
---BeginMessage---
Hi, first of all thank you for your enduring maintenance of Bash.
Unfortunately I am writing to whine a bit about how the completion is working
but it will, hopefuly, lead to something good.
I wrote a little perl module to generate bash completion scripts and perl
scripts
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#bash-completion (200811xx) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Allow for comments in known_hosts files (Closes: #511789)
#
package bash-completion
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bash-completion
tags 511789 + pending confirmed
Bug#511789:
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 23:06 +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Fixed, also allowing for preceding whitespace characters (i.e. and \t),
rev1257:
Thanks again and again :-)
Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
revno: 1252
committer: Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
branch nick: current
timestamp: Thu 2009-01-15 00:38:07 +0200
message:
Add --rsyncable to gzip completion (not in upstream gzip (yet?), but
commonly patched into various distros' packages).
We should not be adding completion non-upstream
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:14:47PM +0100, nadim khemir wrote:
1/ Why aren't all the arguments to the command passed to the completion
script? This is purely and simply a lobotomization of the completion
mechanism.
All the arguments typed thusfar should be available in the COMP_WORDS
array.
El sáb, 17-01-2009 a las 02:47 +0200, Ville Skyttä escribió:
On Saturday 17 January 2009, Santiago M. Mola wrote:
revno: 1252
committer: Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi
branch nick: current
timestamp: Thu 2009-01-15 00:38:07 +0200
message:
Add --rsyncable to gzip completion (not in
14 matches
Mail list logo
