David Paleino <d.paleino <at> gmail.com> writes: > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:11:41 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 February 2009, David Paleino wrote: > > > On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:59:25 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > > > I'd insert the following items between 1 and 2, or between 2 and 3: > > > > - finish splitting every command into its own file > > > > - finish reviewing new completions > > > > > > Agreed. > > > > I'd rather see a real release being made before "split every command" takes > > place, no objections otherwise. > > Well, releasing another headache-making bash-completion doesn't really sound > good to me :)
Isn't there a concern that "splitting every command into its own file" is going to make bash_completion slower? If so, maybe we'd better release bash_completion-2 (or ..200902xx) with the improvements made so far, stop supporting bash-2, branch and make the "splitting every command into its own file" part of the new branch: bash_completion-3? Regards, Freddy _______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel