On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 21:47:30 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
I would suggest tagging 0c4b054b1460b7118b23bb9868e08b989e0caa44 as 2.0rc1, so
no new features will go to the 2.x branch after that. And then after some
testing and fixing remaining bugs, release 2.0 before the new year.
Sorry for missing
On 2012-01-04 11:55, David Paleino wrote:
Is everybody ok with tagging that commit (3ccfe02) as 2.0rc1 ?
Fine with me.
___
Bash-completion-devel mailing list
Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
+1 for another 1.9x release. David?
Here! o/
I can make a 1.91 whenever you wish; just tell me which commit to use.
The last one in my repo is a229ea46e701af1c8d55ae44bb61b025af00ec1e .
That's the latest in master at the moment. I don't have anything
pending, but
+1 for another 1.9x release. David?
Here! o/
I can make a 1.91 whenever you wish; just tell me which commit to use.
The last one in my repo is a229ea46e701af1c8d55ae44bb61b025af00ec1e .
That's the latest in master at the moment. I don't have anything
pending, but
On 12/14/2011 07:13 PM, Igor Murzov wrote:
I'm having a hard time
believing that it's really this hard to get stuff to work, are we doing
something wrong? There must be a cleaner way.
I think we made some good progress with bash-completion and it is much more
usable now then ever before.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:58:05 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 12/14/2011 07:13 PM, Igor Murzov wrote:
I'm having a hard time
believing that it's really this hard to get stuff to work, are we doing
something wrong? There must be a cleaner way.
I think we made some good progress with
On 12/14/2011 10:06 PM, David Paleino wrote:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:58:05 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
+1 for another 1.9x release. David?
Here! o/
I can make a 1.91 whenever you wish; just tell me which commit to use. The
last
one in my repo is a229ea46e701af1c8d55ae44bb61b025af00ec1e .
On 12/14/2011 11:16 PM, David Paleino wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:56:42 +0400, Igor Murzov wrote:
I think we should concentrate on the stable release now and probably make
one more beta or rc1 for 2.0 release
+1 for another 1.9x release. David?
Is there any guidelines on how to prepare
