On Mon, 11 May 2009 15:44:49 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > Hi Bash-completion team + subversion maintainer
Hello, > [..] > Namely why is debian shipping with two different bash_completions for > subversion? I have one from bash_completion v1:1.0-2 and one from > subversion v1.5.6dfsg-1(determined via apt-file): Because we had a subversion completion, but didn't check whether it was complete or not. Thus we renamed it as _subversion. > [..] > On my system it seems that the "_subversion" file overrules the > "subversion" (I only checked the _svn function, and assumed this > precedence held for the other svn-commands). AFAICT "_" should come before "s", so "subversion" should really overrule "_subversion"... but I didn't really try this, so sorry if it happened the opposite -- I'll fix it in the next Debian revision (and consequently upstream) David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Bash-completion-devel mailing list Bash-completion-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/bash-completion-devel