On 04/08/2011 11:02 AM, David Paleino wrote:
However, being upstream, I can't just say in Debian we have it, let's drop
support altogether!. We somehow need to check how many users use 3.2 x
4.1.
We also need to be realistic - if there are no active
contributors/maintainers actively
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:51:03 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
[..]
So, given the answers so far, should we add a drop bash 4.1 support
roadmap item, and already for 2.0 (my answer would be yes, and +1)?
+1 for me.
--
. ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
: :' :
Business Proposal!!!
Accept my apology for sending you this email without your consent. I believe
you are a highly respected personality,
I got your email from the peoples search database on the web during my discrete
search for a foreign partner, and
I have a business proposal for you, You
On 110409 13:51, Ville Skyttä wrote:
So, given the answers so far, should we add a drop bash 4.1 support
roadmap item, and already for 2.0 (my answer would be yes, and +1)? I
Yes and +1
___
Bash-completion-devel mailing list
