Re: dnstap shows little logging at debug 10

2021-03-02 Thread Adam Augustine
reciate you being there as a sounding board though. Thanks Mark for looking beyond my initial concern. I would like to see that sort of permissions error get logged in the dnstap logs at some severity level though. I am still not clear what I am doing wrong on that front. Thanks again. On Tue, Mar

dnstap shows little logging at debug 10

2021-03-01 Thread Adam Augustine
I can't seem to get any debug information out of BIND for troubleshooting a dnstap problem I am having. I have a CentOS 8.3.2011 VM with the COPR packages installed. My /etc/opt/isc/scls/isc-bind/named.conf : options { directory "/var/opt/isc/scls/isc-bind/named/data"; listen-on

Re: dnstap shows little logging at debug 10

2021-03-02 Thread Adam Augustine
d/log/named/dnstap.log"; Does work just fine with lots of wonderful data, so it isn't a problem with dnstap per se, it is something with how I am setting up the pipe or environment named is running in. On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:53 PM Mark Andrews wrote: > Do you have something reading

Re: New BIND releases are available: 9.18.28, 9.20.0

2024-07-23 Thread Adam Augustine
he releases. > > > > Ondrej > > -- > > Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > > ond...@isc.org > > > > My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not > > feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > > > >> On

Re: New BIND releases are available: 9.18.28, 9.20.0

2024-07-23 Thread Adam Augustine
asically asked to make the bumps in the repositories to not > follow the releases. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý (He/Him) > ond...@isc.org > > My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel > obligated to reply outside your normal working ho

Re: New BIND releases are available: 9.18.28, 9.20.0

2024-07-23 Thread Adam Augustine
First, thank you all for the hard work you do on BIND. What is the proper mapping of "Current Stable, ESV", "Development", and "New Stable" BIND versions to their respective COPR repos? I feel like it should be obvious, but I am missing something. I think I expected 9.18.28 to appear in